Former Trump Adviser John Bolton Criminally Indicted

[FAITH-IN-HIM]

Whatever wrongdoing p

Since you declared "Please avoid whataboutism; I'm not interested" you shouldn't be bringing Trump's conviction into this.

Thank you for telling me what I should do or what I shouldn’t do.

However, this does not alter the reality that 78 million Americans voted for an individual with 34 felony convictions, suggesting that they prioritize economic considerations, such as lower gas prices, over rule of law.

 

[Servus]

Thank you for telling me what I should do or what I shouldn’t do.

However, this does not alter the reality that 78 million Americans voted for an individual with 34 felony convictions, suggesting that they prioritize economic considerations, such as lower gas prices, over rule of law.

So you've already said, but it doesn't have anything to do with John Bolton being indicted.

 

[Always in His Presence]

So you've already said, but it doesn't have anything to do with John Bolton being indicted.

QFT

 

[FAITH-IN-HIM]

So you've already said, but it doesn't have anything to do with John Bolton being indicted.

As I mentioned in my previous post, it appears likely that Bolton is guilty. The only reason the Biden administration ended the investigation against him may have been to prevent highly classified operations in Iran from being exposed to the public.

However, it is questionable for individuals who voted for a person convicted of 34 felonies to assert that no one is above the law in America. The 78 million Americans who supported a candidate with a criminal conviction may find it difficult to justify their claim of supporting the rule of law. Their votes could be interpreted as prioritizing political alignment over adherence to legal principles in the United States.

 

[Servus]

As I mentioned in my previous post, it appears likely that Bolton is guilty. The only reason the Biden administration ended the investigation against him may have been to prevent highly classified operations in Iran from being exposed to the public.

However, it is questionable for individuals who voted for a person convicted of 34 felonies to assert that no one is above the law in America. The 78 million Americans who supported a candidate with a criminal conviction may find it difficult to justify their claim of supporting the rule of law. Their votes could be interpreted as prioritizing political alignment over adherence to legal principles in the United States.

Okey dokey.

 

[Vambram]

And then 78 million American rewarded him the highest office in the country. If you consider that sentence, imagine what others might learn from it; in America if someone commit crime may result in significant rewards.

78 million Americans knows that those felonies were nothing more than lawfare.

 

[Say it aint so]

If there are people dissimulating classified information to family members, or knowingly doing so to reporters even to the point of telling the reporters they shouldn't be showing them this, or to foreign nationalists at a resort; they should be indicted for those actions.

 

[iluvatar5150]

No one is above the law.

...except people elected president.

78 million Americans knows that those felonies were nothing more than lawfare.

Half of Americans are below average.

 

[FAITH-IN-HIM]

78 million Americans knows that those felonies were nothing more than lawfare.

For centuries, the United States has been recognized for its democratic principles, impartial judiciary, and adherence to the rule of law. In recent decades, public reactions to judicial decisions sometimes reflect agreement with outcomes that align with personal views, while opposing verdicts are occasionally questioned for impartiality or judicial activism.

The prosecution of President Trump during the Biden administration has led to discussions about potential concerns regarding prosecutorial conduct and perceptions of political bias, as well as the conviction's details. The American justice system provides avenues for individuals to appeal convictions and seek legal remedies if necessary.

If prosecution against President Trump involved bias or prosecutorial misconduct, the matter should be litigated through the judicial system, potentially up to the Supreme Court. Voters who aim to challenge judicial outcomes through election choices may inadvertently indicate doubts about the impartiality of the judiciary and the nation's commitment to respecting legal processes.

 

[FAITH-IN-HIM]

If there are people dissimulating classified information to family members, or knowingly doing so to reporters even to the point of telling the reporters they shouldn't be showing them this, or to foreign nationalists at a resort; they should be indicted for those actions.

That's where John Bolton is at fault. Although some will turn this into a political issue, his indictment by the Trump administration is not entirely political.

 

[Say it aint so]

That's where John Bolton is at fault. Although some will turn this into a political issue, his indictment by the Trump administration is not entirely political.

Unless the Trump admin is not doing the same to everyone who dissimulates classified info to those they shouldn't, then one can argue it is political.

 

[FAITH-IN-HIM]

...except people elected president.



Half of Americans are below average.

What I have seen in last 30 years, the other side isn't much different. If a Democratic nominee had 34 felony convictions and was running against a Republican, half the country would still vote for the democratic nominee.

 

[FAITH-IN-HIM]

Unless the Trump admin is not doing the same to everyone who dissimulates classified info to those they shouldn't, then one can argue it is political.

Not every white-collar crime is prosecuted; it's up to the discretion of the judicial system. If some white-collar crimes go unprosecuted, that doesn't mean none can be prosecuted.

 

[Say it aint so]

Not every white-collar crime is prosecuted; it's up to the discretion of the judicial system. If some white-collar crimes go unprosecuted, that doesn't mean none can be prosecuted.

It's up to DOJ to indict and prosecute. I think I should clarify. Trump has done the same as Bolton on two occasions. Once to reporters while knowingly mentioning to reporters he shouldn't be showing them this. Another was to a foreign nationalist at his resort. And if they ever make available the pending IG report of Hegseth and "Signal leak" he too will be found dissimulating classified information to people without classified status.

 

[Always in His Presence]

It's up to DOJ to indict and prosecute.

False:
from a simple AI search -

Indictments in the United States typically come from a grand jury, not directly from the Department of Justice (DOJ). The DOJ, through its prosecutors (like U.S. Attorneys or Assistant U.S. Attorneys), presents evidence to a grand jury, which then decides whether there’s enough evidence to issue an indictment. An indictment is a formal charge accusing someone of a crime.

Here’s how it works:

• Federal Level: In federal cases, the DOJ investigates and gathers evidence through agencies like the FBI, DEA, or ATF. DOJ prosecutors then present this to a federal grand jury, which issues the indictment if probable cause is found.

 

[Yttrium]

False:
from a simple AI search -

That's right. Just like a grand jury indicted Trump on all those felony charges, Bolton was also indicted by a grand jury. It's not lawfare, and we should take such indictments very seriously.

 

[Pommer]

For them what wanna know: The indictment

 

[Bradskii]

No one is above the law.

Mrs. Bradskii: What on earth is all this milk and cereal doing over the computer screen?

 

[Say it aint so]

False:
from a simple AI search -

???
The DOJ presents a case to a grand jury. From your own blurb:

Federal Level: In federal cases, the DOJ investigates and gathers evidence through agencies like the FBI, DEA, or ATF. DOJ prosecutors then present this to a federal grand jury, which issues the indictment if probable cause is found.

 

[Servus]

So much bitterness and resentment over Trump's conviction not keeping him from being elected. As if that's what the indictment and conviction was really all about.