• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Letita Jamews indicted for fraud

A2SG

Gumby
Jun 17, 2008
10,011
3,937
Massachusetts
✟177,445.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Imagine that...saying Trump was guilty BEFORE there was even a trial and she was going to get HIM specifically!
What was wrong with that? She's entitled to her opinion, same as everyone else, and she has the right to voice that opinion, same as everyone else. She was running to be elected as a prosecutor, of course she was going to pledge she'd prosecute criminals.

Thing is, though, when it came time to actually prosecute Trump, she didn't just utter her opinion in court and call it a day. She provided EVIDENCE. And that EVIDENCE was sufficient to prove Trump was guilty.

It remains to be seen if Trump's DOJ has the same preponderance of evidence against James as she had against Trump, though. From what I've read, it doesn't seem like it, but it's always possible there's more evidence than we currently know about. Stranger things have happened.

-- A2SG, never imagined a president would so blatantly use the DOJ to go after those he has a personal grudge against, but here we are.....
 
  • Agree
Reactions: DaisyDay
Upvote 0

Yeshua HaDerekh

Men dream of truth, find it then cant live with it
May 9, 2013
13,380
4,711
Eretz
✟384,537.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
What was wrong with that? She's entitled to her opinion, same as everyone else, and she has the right to voice that opinion, same as everyone else. She was running to be elected as a prosecutor, of course she was going to pledge she'd prosecute criminals.

-- A2SG, never imagined a president would so blatantly use the DOJ to go after those he has a personal grudge against, but here we are.....
Not when you are running for public office! I guess you are OK with what Jones said in VA then? She did not say criminals, she said she was going to get Trump. She SPECIFICALLY named Trump, Trump wasn't a criminal when she said it. So it is just fine when Biden's DOJ, liberal judges and prosecutors do it but not republicans...typical
 
Upvote 0

A2SG

Gumby
Jun 17, 2008
10,011
3,937
Massachusetts
✟177,445.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Not when you are running for public office!
Why not? Are political candidates not protected by the first amendment, same as everyone else?

I guess you are OK with what Jones said in VA then? She did not say criminals, she said she was going to get Trump. She SPECIFICALLY named Trump, Trump wasn't a criminal when she said it.
True...but she believed he was, and said so. Again, freedom of speech. Now, it's entirely possible she had evidence of his guilt back then, so we cannot say for sure how much she knew about his financial shenanigans at that point, but regardless...she was running to prosecute criminals, and she promised to get someone she believed was a criminal. Even if she'd been incorrect on that assessment (she wasn't), she still had every right to voice her opinion.

So it is just fine when Biden's DOJ, liberal judges and prosecutors do it but not republicans...typical
When have I ever said anyone, in the DOJ or not, isn't free to voice their own opinion? If you're gonna accuse me of something, please check and make sure it's something I've actually done, mmkay?

-- A2SG, not gonna accept responsibility for stuff you've made up.....
 
Upvote 0

RocksInMyHead

God is innocent; Noah built on a floodplain!
May 12, 2011
9,554
10,351
PA
✟450,877.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
The lie and mortgage fraud is in the forms she herself filled out.
As far as I'm aware, there was an error on one of her forms. That's not disputed by anyone.

Calling it a lie or fraud necessitates that the error be intentional, and that is what the government must prove.
 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
43,709
46,770
Los Angeles Area
✟1,044,350.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
Some context from another thread.

Trump poised to fire US attorney for resisting effort to charge NY AG: Sources

President Donald Trump is expected to fire the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia after his office was unable to find incriminating evidence of mortgage fraud against New York Attorney General Letitia James, according to sources.
Trump nominated Siebert for the position in May.

How can this not be seen as naked retribution? Your own handpicked guy says there's nothing there. That's not good enough, so you keep firing people until you get Letitia James indicted.

Trump nominates White House aide to be top US prosecutor for office probing Letitia James

Halligan has been part of Trump’s legal orbit for the last several years, including serving as one of his attorneys in the early days of the FBI’s investigation into Trump’s retention of classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida.

[recently involved in purging the Smithsonian of wrongthink]

Top prosecutor is rejecting Trump pressure to charge New York AG

A key federal prosecutor in Virginia, where James Comey was indicted, is resisting bringing charges against Letitia James.

Elizabeth Yusi, who oversees major criminal prosecutions in the Norfolk office of the Eastern District of Virginia, has confided to co-workers that she sees no probable cause to believe James engaged in mortgage fraud, the two sources told MSNBC. Yusi plans to present her conclusion to the president’s new interim U.S. attorney, Lindsey Halligan, in the coming weeks, they said.

But Lindsay Halligan has but one brief - Do what the Boss says.
 
Upvote 0

Say it aint so

Well-Known Member
Jun 19, 2020
3,483
2,982
27
Seattle
✟174,587.00
Country
United States
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single
The gang who can't shoot straight. As much as Trump tries to be a Mafia boss, he's just bad at it.
No Mafia boss would ever announce their intentions by accidentally sending a message meant to be private, in public.

1760113291589.png


Comey, Tish James, and Abrego Garcia will have these cases thrown out faster than the Trump lawsuit against the NYTimes.
 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
43,709
46,770
Los Angeles Area
✟1,044,350.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)

Pam Bondi, DOJ officials caught off guard by Tish James indictment: Sources

Sources said that Tish James' indictment for alleged fraud came as a surprise.

As ABC News previously reported, Martin and Bill Pulte, the director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, who initially made the criminal referral to DOJ over James’ mortgage applications, have in recent weeks clashed with senior leadership of the department as they’ve demanded more aggressive actions to prosecute President Trump's political enemies.

One former senior DOJ official said it would be extraordinary for leadership at the department to not be informed of a pending indictment of a major political figure like James, which would more typically be led by the department’s Public Integrity Section. Staff in that office has been eliminated to just two officials down from roughly 30 since Trump’s inauguration, according to sources.

Trump apparently has very little need for people to keep an eye on public integrity.
 
Upvote 0

Say it aint so

Well-Known Member
Jun 19, 2020
3,483
2,982
27
Seattle
✟174,587.00
Country
United States
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single

Pam Bondi, DOJ officials caught off guard by Tish James indictment: Sources

Sources said that Tish James' indictment for alleged fraud came as a surprise.

As ABC News previously reported, Martin and Bill Pulte, the director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, who initially made the criminal referral to DOJ over James’ mortgage applications, have in recent weeks clashed with senior leadership of the department as they’ve demanded more aggressive actions to prosecute President Trump's political enemies.

One former senior DOJ official said it would be extraordinary for leadership at the department to not be informed of a pending indictment of a major political figure like James, which would more typically be led by the department’s Public Integrity Section. Staff in that office has been eliminated to just two officials down from roughly 30 since Trump’s inauguration, according to sources.

Trump apparently has very little need for people to keep an eye on public integrity.
Kind of like back when he was marking "C" for "colored" on rental applications and then throwing them in the trash.
They mark nominees with a "I" for any semblance of integrity during vetting.
Those with found with integrity go into the trash can.
 
Upvote 0

DaisyDay

I Did Nothing Wrong!! ~~Team Deep State
Jan 7, 2003
42,505
20,355
Finger Lakes
✟323,056.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
The charges were brought by the DOJ. A Grand Jury of her peers brought the indictment.
On Trump's orders by the newly appointed US Attorney Linsey Halligan who has zero prosecutorial experience.
People with ‘sterling character’ don’t lie on mortgage applications.
Nor did she lie. Out of all the papers submitted to the mortgage company, Halligan found one check box mischecked by James' niece who had power of attorney to fill out a few papers.

This is another vindictive prosecution by our highly vindictive president. This is s shameful act on the government's part.
 
Upvote 0

DaisyDay

I Did Nothing Wrong!! ~~Team Deep State
Jan 7, 2003
42,505
20,355
Finger Lakes
✟323,056.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Wasn't it Latitia James who went after Trump for what she called a financial fraud which turned out to be more of a paperwork error?
No, it wasn't a paperwork error. It was a deliberate overestimation of the value of properties when applying for loans with a deliberate underestimation of the very same properties for tax write-offs.
Maybe she'll end up having to pay out the $100,000,000 she tried to get from him. That would be a fitting end to a woman who made it her campaign theme to go after Trump.
She promised to go after criminals such as DJT and fulfilled that promise. Trump's DOJ is retaliating on his behalf which is not something any government should do. This is vengeance and persecution from the highest office in our government. It is not only unlawful but and absolute disgrace to our country.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: childeye 2
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
43,709
46,770
Los Angeles Area
✟1,044,350.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
Looks like they got the wrong woman.

A cover sheet accompanying the five-page indictment, filed on October 9 in the Eastern District of Virginia, lists James’s address as “Brooklyn, New Jersey,” despite her well-known residence in Brooklyn, New York.

see also:

Problems identified in Halligan’s initial filings [on Comey], including duplicate case numbers and clerical errors such as misspellings in official documents that have been flagged on social media.

A widely shared post on X said she “doesn’t know the difference between a bedrock principle and a bedrock ‘principal’.”


Hey, I get it. it's just a few little errors in some paperwork, let's not make a federal case out of it!
 
Upvote 0

wing2000

E pluribus unum
Site Supporter
Aug 18, 2012
25,456
21,511
✟1,778,613.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The gang who can't shoot straight. As much as Trump tries to be a Mafia boss, he's just bad at it.
No Mafia boss would ever announce their intentions by accidentally sending a message meant to be private, in public.

View attachment 371346

Comey, Tish James, and Abrego Garcia will have these cases thrown out faster than the Trump lawsuit against the NYTimes.

More evidence for a "vindictive prosecution" defense...
 
Upvote 0