A2SG
Gumby
- Jun 17, 2008
- 10,011
- 3,937
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Other Religion
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Democrat
What was wrong with that? She's entitled to her opinion, same as everyone else, and she has the right to voice that opinion, same as everyone else. She was running to be elected as a prosecutor, of course she was going to pledge she'd prosecute criminals.Imagine that...saying Trump was guilty BEFORE there was even a trial and she was going to get HIM specifically!
Thing is, though, when it came time to actually prosecute Trump, she didn't just utter her opinion in court and call it a day. She provided EVIDENCE. And that EVIDENCE was sufficient to prove Trump was guilty.
It remains to be seen if Trump's DOJ has the same preponderance of evidence against James as she had against Trump, though. From what I've read, it doesn't seem like it, but it's always possible there's more evidence than we currently know about. Stranger things have happened.
-- A2SG, never imagined a president would so blatantly use the DOJ to go after those he has a personal grudge against, but here we are.....
Upvote
0