Mid Acts Dispensationalist Only WE GRACE BELIEVERS HAVE BEEN ASSIGNED. ??

[Dan Perez]

#1 IN // EN , is. a. PREPOSTION

# 2 WHOM // HOS , is. a RELATIVE PRONOUN , in. the DATIVE CASE , in. the SIGNULAR

# 3 ALSO // KAI is a CONJUNCATION

# 4. WE HAVE OBTAINED AN INHERITANCE. // KLEROO , in. the AORIST TENSE , in. the PASSIVE VOICE , means Christ is involved. , in. the

is in. the INDICATIVE MOOD , means you better believe it , in. the PLURAL

# 5 BEING PREDESTINTED // PREOONZO. is a AORIST TENSE , is. a PARTICIPLE. , in. the NOMINATIVE CASE , in. the PLURAL

# 6 ACCORDINGG TO // KATA , is. a PREPOSTION

# 7. THE PURPOSE // PROTHESIS. , in. ACCUSATIVE CASE , in. the SINGULAR

# 8 OF HIM // HO , in. the DATIVE CASE , in the Singular

# 9 WHO WORKETH // ENELETH , in. the PRESENT TENSE , in. the ACTIVE VOICE , is. a PARTICIPLE. is a verb , in. the GENITIVE CASE

in the SINUGULAR

# 10 ALL THINKS. // PAS , is an ACCUSATIVE CASE , in. the Plural in. the NEUTER

# 11 AFTER // KATA , is. a PREPOSTION

# 12. THE // HO. , is a DEFINITE ARTICLE in the ACCUSATIVE CASE , in the SINGULAR

# 13 COUNSEL // BOULO , in. the ACCUSATIVE CASE , in the SIGNULAR

# 14 OF HIS OWN. // AUTOS. , is. a PERSONAL POSSESSEIVE PRONOUN , in. the GENITIVE CASE , in. the SINGULAR.

# 15 WILL // THELOMA. , in. the GENIYIVE CASE , in. the SINGULAR. in. the NEUTER


So who was assigned this Inheritance. :

# 1 TO those under the OLD COVENANT ?

#2 TO. those under the NEW COVENANT. ?

# 3 TO those in. the Millennial Kingdom ?

# 4 To those that are saved by GRACE of God ??

dan p

 

[Delvianna]

To those who are considered God's. Whether it is Jews who believe and follow Jesus, or Gentiles who are grafted in. Since there is neither Jew nor Gentile and we are all one in Christ, that means all who are his is subject to the inheritance.

 

[Dan Perez]

To those who are considered God's. Whether it is Jews who believe and follow Jesus, or Gentiles who are grafted in. Since there is neither Jew nor Gentile and we are all one in Christ, that means all who are his is subject to the inheritance.

And in. Gal 3:28 says , There CANNOT //. OV. , means that there cannot be. be JEWS nor Greeks , there CANNOT be// OV

slave. nor free , there CANNOT //. OV. ever be male and female. for you ARE // ESTE , which is in the Greek , PRESENT TENSE

IN CHRIST JESUS ,

And in 1. Cor. 12: 13 we are all. PLACED into ONE BODY.

verse 15 we are Christ foot

verse 16 , we are His EARS

verse 17 we are Christ eyes , his sense of Hearing , his sense of Smell

I can. say we are Christ here on earth

and we are not the BRIDE of Christ , EITHER nor are we GRAFTED in either !!
'
Am glad of your reply and I am a DISPENSATIONALIST. , PRE- TRI and PER-MIL. so you know where I am

coming from. !!

dan p

 

[Delvianna]

And in. Gal 3:28 says , There CANNOT //. OV. , means that there cannot be. be JEWS nor Greeks , there CANNOT be// OV

slave. nor free , there CANNOT //. OV. ever be male and female. for you ARE // ESTE , which is in the Greek , PRESENT TENSE

IN CHRIST JESUS ,

And in 1. Cor. 12: 13 we are all. PLACED into ONE BODY.

verse 15 we are Christ foot

verse 16 , we are His EARS

verse 17 we are Christ eyes , his sense of Hearing , his sense of Smell

I can. say we are Christ here on earth

and we are not the BRIDE of Christ , EITHER nor are we GRAFTED in either !!
'
Am glad of your reply !!

dan p

But the word is Ouk/OU (G3756) so to say it's translated as "cannot" is incorrect.

The main definition is "no" or "not". While "cannot" is used as a translation, the reason it isn't with this verse is due to grammar.

Notice "cannot" has its own separate greek reference of "G1410".
So the reference of "cannot" (ever) placed inside this verse changes the point Paul was trying to make. To say cannot/ever, is essentially striping the identity within the body. Paul was trying to make a point, but not make it into a finite point of completely striping our singular identity in a complete, literal way.

But, the original tree that Paul referenced the Gentiles being grafted into, started with the Jews. So we can't say that we both were placed into one body which goes against Pauls point of the tree and being grafted in. So its the idea that the promise of inheritance was started out to be Israel when God made a promise to Abraham, but since we Gentiles are grafted into the family/body, we then are able to accept that inheritance. I know I'm being a stickler for word choices, but I think it's important because falsely using wrong wording can strip the point the biblical writer intended to make.

 

[Dan Perez]

But the word is Ouk/OU (G3756) so to say it's translated as "cannot" is incorrect.
View attachment 370680

The main definition is "no" or "not". While "cannot" is used as a translation, the reason it isn't with this verse is due to grammar.

View attachment 370682
Notice "cannot" has its own separate greek reference of "G1410".
So the reference of "cannot" (ever) placed inside this verse changes the point Paul was trying to make. To say cannot/ever, is essentially striping the identity within the body. Paul was trying to make a point, but not make it into a finite point of completely striping our singular identity in a complete, literal way.

But, the original tree that Paul referenced the Gentiles being grafted into, started with the Jews. So we can't say that we both were placed into one body which goes against Pauls point of the tree and being grafted in. So its the idea that the promise of inheritance was started out to be Israel when God made a promise to Abraham, but since we Gentiles are grafted into the family/body, we then are able to accept that inheritance. I know I'm being a stickler for word choices, but I think it's important because falsely using wrong wording can strip the point the biblical writer intended to make.

And it. uses CANNOT / 57 x and NOT /. 1210 X and NO /. 147 x and I use BLUE LETTER BIBLE. and we are using

the same Greek word OU. !!

dan p

 

[Delvianna]

And it. is uses CANNOT / 57 x and NOT /. 1210 X and NO /. 147 x and I use BLUE LETTER BIBLE. and we are using

the same Greek word OU. !!

dan p

Right, but the decision for the word choice depends on grammar which is why the translations don't use "cannot" in that verse. Greek is more flexable when you have a word placement. This is why if you revert back to my first picture I posted, there are 4 options of the same greek word "OU" because depending on the word choice, depends on the definition and translation word. example : οὐ, οὐκ, οὐχ are not all the same. But they are options with different endings of the same word which changes the meaning.

 

[Delvianna]

Let me give you a better example to show what I mean... Let's take 1 Corinthians 12:21

Notice how OU is there, HOWEVER...

Notice what it translates as cannot? It's the 2 words together combined and not the single use of OU. G1410 essentially means "can" and G3756 is "not" or "no". Combined, you get the english of "cannot".

 

[Dan Perez]

Right, but the decision for the word choice depends on grammar which is why the translations don't use "cannot" in that verse. Greek is more flexable when you have a word placement. This is why if you revert back to my first picture I posted, there are 4 options of the same greek word "OU" because depending on the word choice, depends on the definition and translation word. example : οὐ, οὐκ, οὐχ are not all the same. But they are options with different endings of the same word which changes the meaning.

And am comfortable. using the word CANNOT and have more trouble with understanding my Greek book and even , I have

read when many who are. Greek teacher CANNOT agree !!

dan p

 

[Delvianna]

And am comfortable. using the word CANNOT and have more trouble with understanding my Greek book and even , I have

read when many who are. Greek teacher CANNOT agree !!

dan p

Up to you, but as my last message #7 I show you how cannot is actually used. So even if you're comfortable with it, I'm trying to show that the use is incorrect.

 

[Dan Perez]

Up to you, but as my last message #7 I show you how cannot is actually used. So even if you're comfortable with it, I'm trying to show that the use is incorrect.

And thanks for your reply. !!

dan p

 

[Delvianna]

And thanks for your reply. !!

dan p

welcome

 

[Dan Perez]

welcome

AND I do remember one more in 1 Cor 1:15 LEST // ME. and there is also , UN and ME and OV. and their are one more making 4 and this. one for LEST // ME , G3361 , shows why Paul , never water baptized NO ONE , because , then anyone should SAY that I had BAPIZED
for my name !!
dan p