Trump Calls For Ilhan Omar’s Removal From Congress

[rjs330]

Chrilise is dead and the Right wants to focus on why the Left is bad and the Right is good.

If you listen to her all she want to focus on is how the right is bad and the left is good.

The right wants to focus on how the lefts rhetoric has now resulted in multiple shootings and deaths and other violence. Its pretty much all coming from the left now.

But Omar nor the Left have any monopoly hateful rhetoric. Anyway, how is she dangerous?

They pretty much do now and have since Trump got elected.

She personally isn't dangerous. But her mouth is.

 

[wing2000]

I watched it all. Doesn't change a thing about what she said about Charlie. She and the host certainly said they did not support violence, but I don't think anyone claimed that. However in the other interview she said some very scummy things and while this interview was pretty toned down compared to the other, she did blame the right for violence and rhetoric while at the same time saying how we shouldnt be pointing fingers.

She goes on to day how quick the right is to make assumptions about the shooter where the left only want to talk solutions. We all know thats not true in the least. Proof is clear in Charlie’s case where the left immediately said he was a MAGA or right wing. daid we should ALL be civil, which I sgree with. Then she goes on to say we don't mind people getring killed. Then she off hand she starts spewing the left wing talking points about Charlie. Then she says the right doesn't care about lives lost, but only about who they can demonize.

She says the right can't set the fires that consume them and continue to cry about it.

Color me crazy but that doesn't sound like toning down the rhetoric at all.

Charlies dead and they want to focus on all rhe reasons rhe right is bad and the left is good. You take this video and tie it in with the other and you see what a horrible person she is, how disingenuous she is and how filled with hateful rhetoric she is.

Yeah this video didn't help your cause at all.

Nice spin. If I had a transcript, I might take the time to challenge your characterization of her reamarks....but I don't. \

 

[wing2000]

She personally isn't dangerous. But her mouth is.

Never happened.

 

[Bradskii]

Nice spin. If I had a transcript, I might take the time to challenge your characterization of her reamarks....but I don't. \

Just under the actual video on the left there's a section that shown the number of views plus some other details. It ends with ...more. Click that and more information drops down including a link to the transcript.

Personally I wouldn't bother, there's nothing in her remarks that are out of place or outrageous. But...feel free.

 

[rjs330]

Never happened.

Of course it did. A lot of people have died or been injured and assaulted because of her rhetoric.

 

[BCP1928]

Of course it did. A lot of people have died or been injured and assaulted because of her rhetoric.

Name some.

 

[rjs330]

Name some.

I dont think they are releasing the names of Ice agents who have been injured and assaulted. Charlie Kirk was killed. The illegals in Dallas were killed or injured.

Her rhetoric has joined a lot of other voices. Its the rhetoric of the left and she's part of it.

 

[Pommer]

I dont think they are releasing the names of Ice agents who have been injured and assaulted. Charlie Kirk was killed. The illegals in Dallas were killed or injured.

Her rhetoric has joined a lot of other voices. Its the rhetoric of the left and she's part of it.

Are we to infer that your position is that her rhetoric was partially responsible for people’s deaths without a flowchart?
Show us where what she has spoken/written has been a kernel for the motive of the killer of anyone, thanks.

 

[iluvatar5150]

Its pretty much all coming from the left now.

lol k. Melissa Hortman's murder was only three months ago.

 

[rjs330]

lol k. Melissa Hortman's murder was only three months ago.

Pretty much all doesn't mean all. It means most. And in the case of leftist violence its way more. Even the lame stream media recognizes it.

And the major problem with this is more often than not, statistics aew only bases on death counts rather than just on acts of violence that include the destruction of property and injuries to people.

Often the attacks are not listed as leftist attacks, when they clearly are. I dont remember, but were the to trans shooting incidents listed as leftist attacks? Where they included in the stats? We even have people here claiming rhe Mangioni attack wasn't a leftist attack.

Its time for the left to take responsibility and say enough is enough.

 

[rjs330]

Are we to infer that your position is that her rhetoric was partially responsible for people’s deaths without a flowchart?
Show us where what she has spoken/written has been a kernel for the motive of the killer of anyone, thanks.

You need a flow chart? Really? I bet you wouldn't need a flow chart if Republican representatives attacked some government agencies with the same accusations and we started having right wing people shooting and attacking those agencies.

 

[rambot]

Of course it did. A lot of people have died or been injured and assaulted because of her rhetoric.

No less with Trump.

But that's okay I suppose....

 

[rjs330]

Pretty much all doesn't mean all. It means most. And in the case of leftist violence its way more. Even the lame stream media recognizes it.

And the major problem with this is more often than not, statistics aew only bases on death counts rather than just on acts of violence that include the destruction of property and injuries to people.

Often the attacks are not listed as leftist attacks, when they clearly are. I dont remember, but were the to trans shooting incidents listed as leftist attacks? Where they included in the stats? We even have people here claiming rhe Mangioni attack wasn't a leftist attack.

Its time for the left to take responsibility and say enough is enough.

Buy the way the shooter told us that he shot Hortman because Tim Walz told him to. We all know Walz didn't tell him to or tell him to kill those democrats on the list, but based upon that, its no different than some other nut job saying Jesus told them to kill. It speaks far more to the guys mental health than his ideology. Hearing voices is a serious mental illness.

 

[Pommer]

You need a flow chart? Really? I bet you wouldn't need a flow chart if Republican representatives attacked some government agencies with the same accusations and we started having right wing people shooting and attacking those agencies.

She said [things] and some rando nutjob did [things], isn’t evidence.

 

[rjs330]

No less with Trump.

But that's okay I suppose....

Right wing violence is down.

Trumps rhetoric is based on personal attacks by the left. The attacks to destroy him and his family. REAL attacks from democrats to destroy his life and put him in jail. Including two attempts on his life.So I'll cut him a little slack.

When you start decrying the violence and rhetoric from the left I'll take you seriously.

And I can't take you seriously with such a ridiculous conspiratorial question you raised about the bullets.

 

[rjs330]

She said [things] and some rando nutjob did [things], isn’t evidence.

It sure seems rhat its evidence for you you guys when you think a right winger does something. Why is it so different for leftists?

Here's a montage of SOME of the rhetoric.

You can skip to 1:12 to see it.

 

[Pommer]

It sure seems rhat its evidence for you you guys when you think a right winger does something. Why is it so different for leftists?

Here's a montage of SOME of the rhetoric.

You can skip to 1:12 to see it.

Your video didn’t make your point.
All I saw were some politicians bemoaning the fact that ICE agents were “disappearing“ people off the streets, while hiding their own (the ICE agent’s) indentities.

 

[rambot]

Right wing violence is down.

For the first time since the 90! Kudos.

Trumps rhetoric is based on personal attacks by the left.

IT's disappointing when "observations" are classified as attacks. But that is just another masterstroke for Trump; that's he's convinced people of that.

The attacks to destroy him and his family.

Which observations were those? When he said he'd date his daughter?
Where we remind about how he raped Ivana, when they were married?
When we remind that he's slept with prostitutes while married?
OR that his very good friend is a pedophile?

Which of these observations was an attack?

REAL attacks from democrats to destroy his life and put him in jail. Including two attempts on his life.

Again...what do you mean "real attacks". There has been nothing 100% conclusive that either of those attempts were from hardenned democrats. Or was the 2nd one proven? The one that didn't get the shot out; where he was rooting around in a hedge?

When you start decrying the violence and rhetoric from the left I'll take you seriously.

Nice try. For the last 3 years we've been putting up data that show an increase in Far Right violence....NONE of you have acknowldged it. You've all tried to obfuscate, downplay or in other ways excuse it. Or suggest the definitions are all wonky. Nothing close to responsible.

And now, ONE year of the left getting more violence and this is your attitude?

Physician, heal thyself.

And I can't take you seriously with such a ridiculous conspiratorial question you raised about the bullets.

I'm sorry? Which "question" was that?

 

[iluvatar5150]

Buy the way the shooter told us that he shot Hortman because Tim Walz told him to. We all know Walz didn't tell him to or tell him to kill those democrats on the list, but based upon that, its no different than some other nut job saying Jesus told them to kill. It speaks far more to the guys mental health than his ideology. Hearing voices is a serious mental illness.

Or he just lied.

 

[rambot]

Or he just lied.

why would he lie?