Trump Calls For Ilhan Omar’s Removal From Congress

[ViaCrucis]

Stick around, it's going to get even better.

Do you think they'll let us make s'mores in the gulags? Or will marshmallow be too woke?

 

[Pommer]

It's not a secret in this country. Here's a recent article mentioning the alliance:

"Although Marxists and Islamists have banded together to undermine Judeo-Christian values in the West, theirs is an uncomfortable alliance, as the atheistic Marxist state is ultimately incompatible with an Islamic caliphate."

Why progressives want to destroy Christianity — but spare Islam | Blaze Media

The battle for America's soul is under way — and Christianity is in the crosshairs.

www.theblaze.com

Free association is a part of the First Amendment.

 

[Desk trauma]

Free association is a part of the First Amendment.

That old thing?

 

[Valletta]

Free association is a part of the First Amendment.

When they violate the law it is another story.

 

[Pommer]

When they violate the law it is another story.

How has the (what?) law been “violated”?

 

[Bradskii]

When they violate the law it is another story.

We're still hoping for some facts.

 

[wing2000]

...and still, none of Rep Omar's critics on this thread have actually listened to the referenced interview.

 

[Yeshua HaDerekh]

...and still, none of Rep Omar's critics on this thread have actually listened to the referenced interview.

 

[rjs330]

She has a first amendment right.

So does the president. He has the right to say what he thinks.

 

[rjs330]

So much for civility and lowering the dehumanizing rhetoric.

I don't think Trump.is the one to do that. He lashed out against Omar who also was NOT doing anything but stating dehumanizing rhetoric.

 

[Bradskii]

I just checked. He's wrong.

 

[Yeshua HaDerekh]

I just checked. He's wrong.

In what way? Do tell!!!

 

[Bradskii]

In what way? Do tell!!!

The title of the video is wrong. Maybe you should have checked before posting it. But never mind. No harm done.

 

[Yeshua HaDerekh]

The title of the video is wrong. Maybe you should have checked before posting it. But never mind. No harm done.

Um, OK...

 

[wing2000]

.....you stil have not listened to the interview have you?

 

[Yeshua HaDerekh]

.....you stil have not listened to the interview have you?

Why? I know what she says, I have heard her many times in the past.

 

[rjs330]

.....you stil have not listened to the interview have you?

Where is this interview we arw supposed to watch that will clarify everything for us? I cant find it on you tube. I can only find snippets.

 

[wing2000]

Where is this interview we arw supposed to watch that will clarify everything for us? I cant find it on you tube. I can only find snippets.

...mid-interview, the question was asked about Kirk (interview occurred two days afer his death):

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

www.youtube.com

 

[rjs330]

...mid-interview, the question was asked about Kirk (interview occurred two days afer his death):

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

www.youtube.com

I watched it all. Doesn't change a thing about what she said about Charlie. She and the host certainly said they did not support violence, but I don't think anyone claimed that. However in the other interview she said some very scummy things and while this interview was pretty toned down compared to the other, she did blame the right for violence and rhetoric while at the same time saying how we shouldnt be pointing fingers.

She goes on to day how quick the right is to make assumptions about the shooter where the left only want to talk solutions. We all know thats not true in the least. Proof is clear in Charlie’s case where the left immediately said he was a MAGA or right wing. daid we should ALL be civil, which I sgree with. Then she goes on to say we don't mind people getring killed. Then she off hand she starts spewing the left wing talking points about Charlie. Then she says the right doesn't care about lives lost, but only about who they can demonize.

She says the right can't set the fires that consume them and continue to cry about it.

Color me crazy but that doesn't sound like toning down the rhetoric at all.

Charlies dead and they want to focus on all rhe reasons rhe right is bad and the left is good. You take this video and tie it in with the other and you see what a horrible person she is, how disingenuous she is and how filled with hateful rhetoric she is.

Yeah this video didn't help your cause at all.

 

[BCP1928]

Charlies dead and they want to focus on all rhe reasons rhe right is bad and the left is good. You take this video and tie it in with the other and you see what a horrible person she is, how disingenuous she is and how filled with hateful rhetoric she is.

Chrilise is dead and the Right wants to focus on why the Left is bad and the Right is good. But Omar nor the Left have any monopoly hateful rhetoric. Anyway, how is she dangerous?