Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Correct, Carr should never have said such a thing.What baloney
At least he was honest.There are so very few that aren't.
It wasn't a formal decree. It was a non-binding comment. Hence, the decision belongs to ABC, and ABC also thinks Kimmel should make a donation to Turning Point USA.Correct, Carr should never have said such a thing.
Trump openly admitted that he can't stand his opponent, unlike Kirk. There's nothing ironic about that admission to the truth.I guess that the irony is lost on some.
Was Kirk too much of a coward to say that?Trump openly admitted that he can't stand his opponent, unlike Kirk. There's nothing ironic about that admission to the truth.
I don't think so. The question doesn't offend me though, if that’s what the intention was. I'm a Catholic, so never really heard of Charlie Kirk until his assassination, though my 14 year old was a fan of his, which i didn't know until she discovered Kirk’s shocking death, and began telling me about him.Was Kirk too much of a coward to say that?
I just heard some breaking news from CNN - Abraham Lincoln's assassin was actually Ulysses S. Grant.The right tried to kill Trump, Pence, both Pelosis, Whitmer, and tried to overthrow the government.
Words have consequences. Doesn’t mean anyone is being censored.What decisions?
Your comment about Trump praised his honesty. I'll assume that you weren't being sarcastic. Which therefore makes the comment ironic.Trump openly admitted that he can't stand his opponent, unlike Kirk. There's nothing ironic about that admission to the truth.
There's a big difference between Trump's exaggerations and the blatant lies that the left wing news media feeds society with.Your comment about Trump praised his honesty. I'll assume that you weren't being sarcastic. Which therefore makes the comment ironic.
Nope, just doubting Kirk doesn't fall in that category.I don't think so. The question doesn't offend me though, if that’s what the intention was.
I'm a Catholic, so never really heard of Charlie Kirk until his assassination, though my 14 year old was a fan of his, which i didn't know until she discovered Kirk’s shocking death, and began telling me about him.
Cool story....But I can't judge his character because I never followed him. What I will judge, though, are those who take jabs at him, after his death, because I think that's tacky and plain trashy.
Kirk was associated with right wing organizations like the New Apostolic Reformation which are distinctly anti-Catholic. Kirk didn't appear to be anti-Catholic himself, but watch out for whoever takes over Turning Point USA next.I don't think so. The question doesn't offend me though, if that’s what the intention was. I'm a Catholic, so never really heard of Charlie Kirk until his assassination, though my 14 year old was a fan of his, which i didn't know until she discovered Kirk’s shocking death, and began telling me about him.
...But I can't judge his character because I never followed him. What I will judge, though, are those who take jabs at him, after his death, because I think that's tacky and plain trashy.
I feel pretty fortunate in that they tend to make genuinely good choices, especially compared to many of mine at that age. If they're watching Charlie Kirk videos instead of listening to Eazy-E, I'd say they're in much better shape than I was.You might want to track your kids internet usage a bit more closely.
It's noted that you think that the president of your country constantly lying to you is only to be classed as 'virtually harmless'. No wonder you're in such a mess.One is virtually harmless...
But remember, I said they were "exaggerations", not lies. Exaggerations as in exaggerating the truth. Which is kinda honest.It's noted that you think that the president of your country constantly lying to you is only to be classed as 'virtually harmless'. No wonder you're in such a mess.
Then I will also note that outright lies are now only 'exaggerations'. I will again assume that you're not being sarcastic. I guess that maybe the one of the ten commandments that references lying should now be: 'Don't exaggerate when talking about your neighbour'.But remember, I said they were "exaggerations", not lies. Exaggerations as in exaggerating the truth. Which is kinda honest.
People have to look no further than the President of the US for the most influential motivator of hate within the MAGA movement.ABC pulls Jimmy Kimmel Live indefinitely after host's Charlie Kirk commentary
"In response to Kimmel's commentary and goading his audience to laugh at the killing, Nextstar said the company "strongly objects to recent comments made by Mr. Kimmel concerning the killing of Charlie Kirk and will replace the show with other programming in its ABC-affiliated markets."
It was the right move by ABC.
No Kimmel shouldn't have to make a donation, to a cause, that he doesn't believe in. He did nothing wrong. ABC and Disney freaked out over something they shouldn't have. Kimmel shouldn't have to lower his standards, by sucking up to a cause, that he doesn't believe in. Kimmel can make more money, on the the Internet.It wasn't a formal decree. It was a non-binding comment. Hence, the decision belongs to ABC, and ABC also thinks Kimmel should make a donation to Turning Point USA.
ABC affiliate owner demands Jimmy Kimmel make Charlie Kirk donation