Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You're claiming I said it's got to be the left making those calls, when I said it could be the left making those calls. It's like I'm not even allowed to speculate when it comes to the left being responsible for or guilty of anything. Have you guys come up with a name for that yet, like "leftophobe"?
Well, I’m going to wait until I get more information about this all before I go to all the bother of forming an opinion about it all. But, speculate, away, then, if you’d like…maybe yetis are influencing politics to usher in a New Ice Ace?
There's not much to speculate over. It's pretty cut and dry. All that's coming to light is just further verification.
Wring again, I'm saying why a white man shot a white man. I didn't bring people of color into it at all. It's amazing how often you add stuff to my posts that isn't there.
Why would Kirk supporters make terroristic threats to HBCUs, when Kirk never spoke against them and it's not at all what Kirk would want? It seems more likely that HBCUs to make it look racist and we all know who the left loves to accuse those they don't like of being racist.
Kirk has literally has said many a disparaging statement against blacks in specific, and I would assume he has followers that hang on to his every word. And why "It seems more likely that HBCUs to make it look racist" by being the recipient of death threats.
No, he said disparaging things against the DEI hiring of people only because they're black rather than because they're qualified.
That was sloppy of me. It should've been It seems more likely that HBCUs were specifically targeted to make it look racist.
Well, I'll apologise again for conveying a message to you that was not my intent.
Yes. You are saying a white man shot a white man because coloured and white people were calling them racist. That doesn't ADD sense to your answer to the question of "why are white people threatenning coloured people if a white guy shot their hero"?
Yes. Unfortunately that shows a fundamental misunderstanding of how DEI hiring ACTUALLY works.....which is actually a SUPER fundamental part of DEI hiring.
Japan has had gun control policies for centuries, with the first major disarming of the civilian population taking place in the 16th century. Australia has a population of 27 million. If the US just consisted of Texas and was an island and most everyone lived on the coast it could be compared to Australia.
How does DEI hiring ACTUALLY work?
And the peanut is neither a pea, nor a nut.
When there are two EQUALLY QUALIFIED CANDIDATES, the minority should be chosen.
There are reasons why gun control in Japan and Australia work that don't apply to the US. Because the US hasn't had gun control since the 16th century nor does it have a population of only 27 million mostly living on the coasts of an island.
I was hoping you'd quote the policy rather than just give a personal interpretation or surmisal of it. Is what you said based on what you actually read in the policy itself? Did you actually read the actual policy itself?
I have to be a Vanity Fair subscriber to read the whole article. How about a video clip of Charlie Kirk himself actually saying whatever, rather than Ta-Nehisi Coates telling me what he said?
