Paragraph III attests to external trauma, not internal trauma, dear. In an autopsy of a suspicious/untimely death, they remark on injuries that appear readily obvious on the body, both to deconstruct a crime, establish time of death, and contributing causes to death. That part of the report states that he had injuries that were visible, but superficial, and not a cause of his death nor a contributing factor.
The first line tells you cause of death, which is “cardiopulmonary arrest complicating law enforcement subdual, restraint and neck compression” and the finding of “homicide,” which appears on the papers submitted to both the state and the court and were the basis of charges being brought.
You realize in order to make your theory remotely sound, you’d have to believe three autopsy reports lied, the six-eight doctors who were involved in them lied, the testifying doctors lied in court under oath, the defense who said they agreed that the doctors spoke without coercion based off of their findings from the autopsy (which they attested to three times), and the judge and jury who agreed with the findings also all lied.
It’s ok, you can admit you’re wrong. We all see it.