Obama referred to DOJ for criminal charges

[wing2000]

I highly doubt this lasts longer than a few weeks while it serves as a distraction.

Yea, will AG Bondi be calling a press conference in 3-6 months to announce formal charges against *OBAMA*?

Of course not.

 

[Desk trauma]

Yea, will AG Bondi be calling a press conference in 3-6 months to announce formal charges against *OBAMA*?

Of course not.

Who knows, maybe we’re going full banana republic.

 

[Hans Blaster]

Who knows, maybe we’re going full banana republic.

Nah. A *real* banana republic could at least grow bananas, and not impose a large tariff on them to 'support local growers' that don't exist. (Yes, I know a small number of bananas are grown in Hawai'i.)

 

[Postvieww]

oh, and you do?

Apparently so!

 

[eclipsenow]

Other than for just pure whataboutism, what did anything you posted have to do with the op topic?

"Whataboutism" = how MAGA reply to the adage, "People who live in glass houses should not throw stones."

In other words - as with almost every Malignant Narcissist ever - Trump is accusing Obama of what he knows himself to be.

 

[Oompa Loompa]

"Whataboutism" = how MAGA reply to the adage, "People who live in glass houses should not throw stones."

In other words - as with almost every Malignant Narcissist ever - Trump is accusing Obama of what he knows himself to be.

I don't recall Trump ever accusing Obama of having bad proofreading skills.

 

[eclipsenow]

I don't recall Trump ever accusing Obama of having bad proofreading skills.

And now who is avoiding the subject of the OP?

 

[Oompa Loompa]

And now who is avoiding the subject of the OP?

Considering the OP topic is about Obama, the answer is obviously you.

 

[DaisyDay]

Considering the OP topic is about Obama, the answer is obviously you.

The OP is about Trump's DOJ making ridiculous false allegations against his predecessor of a decade ago which many people are saying is an attempt to distract from the Epstein fiasco of his own making.

 

[Oompa Loompa]

The OP is about Trump's DOJ making ridiculous false allegations against his predecessor of a decade ago which many people are saying is an attempt to distract from the Epstein fiasco of his own making.

Then we are in agreement that it the topic is not about Trump's proofreading?

 

[DaisyDay]

Then we are in agreement that it the topic is not about Trump's proofreading?

Why are you pushing this? Most of us are in agreement that, as @eclipsenow said: Trump is accusing Obama of what he knows himself to be.

 

[Oompa Loompa]

Why are you pushing this? Most of us are in agreement that, as @eclipsenow said: Trump is accusing Obama of what he knows himself to be.

The only thing I am pushing is the conversation train back onto the tracks.

 

[DaisyDay]

The only thing I am pushing is the conversation train back onto the tracks.

Nice metaphor!

 

[eclipsenow]

Then we are in agreement that it the topic is not about Trump's proofreading?

The proofreading was just the icing on the cake for me as this silly man invented a silly word while inventing yet another silly conspiracy.

But poor Donald. We should all feel for him.
Even going to Scotland hasn't stopped the world wanting him to fess up to his glory days on Epstein island!

Oh - is that not true? He wasn't there? I'm making stuff up?

Well - perhaps if he released the files we would not be having this conversation any more.
Because he would be in jail!

But then - what would I know? I'm probably just sedacious!

 

[Oompa Loompa]

The proofreading was just the icing on the cake for me as this silly man invented a silly word while inventing yet another silly conspiracy.

But poor Donald. We should all feel for him.
Even going to Scotland hasn't stopped the world wanting him to fess up to his glory days on Epstein island!

Oh - is that not true? He wasn't there? I'm making stuff up?

Well - perhaps if he released the files we would not be having this conversation any more.
Because he would be in jail!

But then - what would I know? I'm probably just sedacious!

The topic is about Obama being accused and possibly criminally charged with sedition. If you want to talk about Trump's relationship with Jeffrey Epstine, there are numerous other threads dedicated to the topic. Now once again I am making an attempt to bring the train back onto the rails. Can you explain why you think Trump is creating a conspiracy against Obama after a lot of evidence has been provided that suggests what Trump is saying is true?

 

[DaisyDay]

The topic is about Obama being accused and possibly criminally charged with sedition. If you want to talk about Trump's relationship with Jeffrey Epstine, there are numerous other threads dedicated to the topic. Now once again I am making an attempt to bring the train back onto the rails.

Accused by Trump & his merry band of minions. If anyone filed such charges they'd risk their law license and a big fine for filing false, frivolous and
politically motivated charges.

Can you explain why you think Trump is creating a conspiracy against Obama after a lot of evidence has been provided that suggests what Trump is saying is true?

No evidence suggests to anyone but the most ardent Maga fans that Trump is not lying. The explanation why is obvious: to distract from his fiasco handling of the Epstein scandal.

 

[truthuprootsevil]

DOJ receives Gabbard's criminal referral on bombshell Russia claims | Fox News

Gabbard released unclassified documents that reportedly show "overwhelming evidence" that President Barack Obama and his team laid the groundwork for what would be the yearslong Trump–Russia probe.

www.foxnews.com

The Department of Justice confirmed Monday that it has received Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard's criminal referral related to her bombshell claims that Obama-era officials "manufactured and politicized intelligence" to create the narrative that Russia was attempting to influence the 2016 presidential election, Fox News has confirmed.

The Department of Justice declined further comment, but confirmed to Fox News that the department received the referral.

Gabbard released unclassified documents Friday that reportedly show "overwhelming evidence" that then-President Barack Obama and his national security team laid the groundwork for what would be the yearslong Trump-Russia collusion probe after Trump's election win against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in 2016.

Pulling at nubs of straws

 

[ozso]

This is rather spicy news. Dan Borgino, the deputy director of the FBI, is "shocked to the core" by what's been uncovered:

3 minute short:

 

[GoldenBoy89]

This is rather spicy news. Dan Borgino, the deputy director of the FBI, is "shocked to the core" by what's been uncovered:

3 minute short:

These people said the same things about rigged election nonsense. What ever happened with the rigged election of 2020?

 

[A2SG]

These people said the same things about rigged election nonsense. What ever happened with the rigged election of 2020?

Apparently, the party they're now calling a hopeless, disorganized mess managed to pull it off without a hitch, leaving not even a hint of evidence behind.

-- A2SG, quite the accomplishment, no?