Obama referred to DOJ for criminal charges

[Oompa Loompa]

I certainly hope they have the guts to bring this to trial. It will be the most fun we've had with politics in decades.

What? You didnt have fun with Trump's trials?

 

[BCP1928]

What? You didnt have fun with Trump's trials?

They were OK. I don't think Democrats have quite the same sense of theater. Besides, look at the characters. Trump was just a fat, boorish old white guy the Dems wanted out of office because of the deplorable policies of his supporters. Not much real drama in that. Now Trump is back as champion of those same supporters, ready to have his revenge by putting the first black president of the US on trial for his life. You've got to admit that's great stuff.

 

[Yarddog]

From our friendly AI:

as of today -

On July 23, 2025, a major development shook the political landscape in the U.S. as Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard declassified a trove of documents alleging that the Obama administration orchestrated a false intelligence narrative about Russian interference in the 2016 election.

Key Allegations

• The 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA), which claimed Russia favored Trump, was allegedly based on substandard intelligence and politically motivated directives from senior officials including then-President Obama.
• Gabbard stated that Obama, CIA Director John Brennan, and others knowingly promoted false claims, including the use of the discredited Steele Dossier.
• The documents suggest that Putin was actually preparing for a Clinton victory, contradicting the narrative that he supported Trump.

Proves that artificial intelligence isn't very intelligent.

 

[ozso]

 

[Say it aint so]

Russian oligarch Yevgeny Prigozhin, "Putin's chef," admits interference in U.S. elections​

"Gentlemen, we interfered, we are interfering, and we will interfere," declared Prigozhin in a statement quoted by his company, Concord. The oligarch has been sanctioned by Washington for running a "troll factory" to influence the outcome of votes in the U.S. and elsewhere.​

​

"Accurately, precisely, surgically, and the way we do it, the way we know how to," Prigozhin quipped in response to a request for comment on the specifics of the interference from a Russian news outlet.​

New reports detail sophistication of Russian influence efforts in U.S.​

Notably, the reports' conclusions support those of the Intelligence Community Assessment issued in 2017, which found with high confidence that Russian president Vladimir Putin and his government developed a "clear preference" for Donald Trump....​

​

..."What is clear is that all of the messaging clearly sought to benefit the Republican Party—and specifically, Donald Trump," the Oxford report authors wrote. "While the IRA strategy was a long-term one, it is clear that activity between 2015 and 2016 was designed to benefit President Trump's campaign."​

​

Trump Homeland Security Head admits Russia aim to help Trump (2018)​

With their Epstein conspiracy coming back to haunt them and hanging them by their own petard, let the spaghetti flinging begin. Yet, this is about as bad as their Epstein cover up to keep those documents with multiple mention of Trump's name out the public. So they give the public something else replete with giving the MAGA echo system their marching orders of diversion.

​

 

[Always in His Presence]

Nowhere to Hide: Gabbard's Doc Dump 100 Percent Reveals Obama Personally Ordered the Russia Collusion Hoax Document - He Originated It All​

The director of the Office of National Intelligence is releasing documentary evidence that shows the 44th president was the primal force behind the political “scandal” that bedeviled the first administration of President Donald Trump.​

​

“The IC is prepared to produce an assessment per the President’s request, that pulls together the information we have on the tools Moscow used and the actions it took to influence the 2016 election, an explanation of why Moscow directed these activities, and how Moscow’s approach has changed over time, going back to 2008 and 2012 as reference points,” the declassified document read.

That key phrase, “per the President’s request,” sure makes it sound like Obama himself wanted this new narrative.

 

[wing2000]

Nowhere to Hide: Gabbard's Doc Dump 100 Percent Reveals Obama Personally Ordered the Russia Collusion Hoax Document - He Originated It All​

The director of the Office of National Intelligence is releasing documentary evidence that shows the 44th president was the primal force behind the political “scandal” that bedeviled the first administration of President Donald Trump.​

​

“The IC is prepared to produce an assessment per the President’s request, that pulls together the information we have on the tools Moscow used and the actions it took to influence the 2016 election, an explanation of why Moscow directed these activities, and how Moscow’s approach has changed over time, going back to 2008 and 2012 as reference points,” the declassified document read.

That key phrase, “per the President’s request,” sure makes it sound like Obama himself wanted this new narrative.

The President ordered it....as should *any* responsible President when a foreign country attempts to influence the outcome of an American election.

 

[Say it aint so]

Nowhere to Hide: Gabbard's Doc Dump 100 Percent Reveals Obama Personally Ordered the Russia Collusion Hoax Document - He Originated It All​

The director of the Office of National Intelligence is releasing documentary evidence that shows the 44th president was the primal force behind the political “scandal” that bedeviled the first administration of President Donald Trump.​

​

“The IC is prepared to produce an assessment per the President’s request, that pulls together the information we have on the tools Moscow used and the actions it took to influence the 2016 election, an explanation of why Moscow directed these activities, and how Moscow’s approach has changed over time, going back to 2008 and 2012 as reference points,” the declassified document read.

That key phrase, “per the President’s request,” sure makes it sound like Obama himself wanted this new narrative.

LOL, a GOP House committee report. Not any of the Intel agencies. And drafted only by Republicans.

At odds with every bipartisan and intel agency report from the Rubio led Senate Report, to Mueller, to John Durham, to Trump's John Radcliff, to what the head of Trump's own DHS head said then.

If this is the smoking gun Trump and the gang who can't shoot straight is rolling with as a "treasonous conspiracy" then it's going to be a worse exercise in futility than all those 70+ Trump, Giuliani, and the rest of those sanctioned lawyers come their claims of voter fraud.

 

[essentialsaltes]

That key phrase, “per the President’s request,” sure makes it sound like Obama himself wanted this new narrative.

'pulling together the information we have' is not pushing any narrative.

 

[wing2000]

On July 23, 2025, the DNI quoted information sourced from Russian Intelligence.....

Heather Cox Richardson writes:

"Despite her [Gabbard] claims that it is a damning bombshell, the material in the newly released report in fact does not challenge the conclusion of the U.S. intelligence agencies, the Mueller report, and the Senate Intelligence Committee that Russia preferred a Trump presidency to a Clinton presidency and worked to get Trump elected in part by attacking Clinton and spreading lies about her health.

What the report did do was deliver red meat to the MAGA base by spreading the same sorts of rumors about Clinton the Russians spread in 2016.

Gabbard compounded that effort at the White House press conference by reading material in the report as if it were fact, saying that Russia had “high-level [Democratic National Committee] e-mails that detailed evidence of Hillary's ‘psycho emotional problems, uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression, and cheerfulness.’ And that then-secretary Clinton was allegedly on a daily regimen of heavy tranquilizers,” along with a number of other charges that Clinton had broken the law. Gabbard did not mention that these allegations were in fact identified in the report as material prepared by Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Services.

Just to be clear: The director of national intelligence for the United States of America is making allegations against a former U.S. presidential candidate based on material from Russia’s intelligence services."

July 23, 2025

This morning, President Donald J.

heathercoxrichardson.substack.com

https://www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/DIG/DIG-Declassified-HPSCI-Report-Manufactured-Russia-Hoax-July2025.pdf

Ref page 16-17

 

[eclipsenow]

Trump said he has irrefutable proof that Obama was sedacoius. It seems Trump creative gifts for beyond manufacturing crimes his political opponents never committed - he now manufactured words that never existed.

Mental health experts warned his slurs had all the signs of cognitive decline. How much longer before America changes the party nomination system? This is not even a joke - but a dangerous farce. It's time for the 25th. The man has malignant narcissistic personality disorder

 

[Hans Blaster]

Trump said he has irrefutable proof that Obama was sedacoius. It seems Trump creative gifts for beyond manufacturing crimes his political opponents never committed - he now manufactured words that never existed.

Mental health experts warned his slurs had all the signs of cognitive decline. How much longer before America changes the party nomination system? This is not even a joke - but a dangerous farce. It's time for the 25th. The man has malignant narcissistic personality disorder

Clearly, Mr. Trump misspoke and meant "salacious conspiracy", which is a conspiracy to tie someone to salacious information like the Epstein things.

 

[Always in His Presence]

Trump said he has irrefutable proof that Obama was sedacoius. It seems Trump creative gifts for beyond manufacturing crimes his political opponents never committed - he now manufactured words that never existed.

words that never existed???

Seditious refers to actions or speech that incite rebellion or discontent against the established government or authority. It often involves promoting resistance or insurrection, and can include both spoken and written expressions that challenge the legitimacy of the government.​

You should use your spell check. The word is an accurate depiction of what Barack Hussein Obama may have done.

 

[GoldenBoy89]

You should use your spell check. The word is an accurate depiction of what Barack Hussein Obama may have done.

Lol at “may have done”. Even you aren’t buying this most recent distraction

 

[Say it aint so]

words that never existed???

Seditious refers to actions or speech that incite rebellion or discontent against the established government or authority. It often involves promoting resistance or insurrection, and can include both spoken and written expressions that challenge the legitimacy of the government.​

You should use your spell check. The word is an accurate depiction of what Barack Hussein Obama may have done.

No, it's not accurate at all. It's a woefully inaccurate definition.

​

If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both. --Cornell Law​

Maybe you should take your own advice on spellcheck.

 

[wing2000]

words that never existed???

Seditious refers to actions or speech that incite rebellion or discontent against the established government or authority. It often involves promoting resistance or insurrection, and can include both spoken and written expressions that challenge the legitimacy of the government.​

Clearly, Mr. Trump misspoke and meant "salacious conspiracy", which is a conspiracy to tie someone to salacious information like the Epstein things.

You should use your spell check. The word is an accurate depiction of what Barack Hussein Obama may have done.

The DNI has no business suggesting *any* charges against *anyone* - much less a former POTUS. Her job is to coordinate and report intelligence.

 

[wing2000]

One thing is clear - Tulsi is back in the club:

“She’s, like, hotter than everybody. She’s the hottest one in the room right now.”

DJT on Tuesday in a meeting with congressional Repulbicans.


Now, the AG has to prove a former POTUS is guilty of sedition....or treason...or whatever crime Trump thinks of....

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/24/us/politics/trump-obama-gabbard-bondi.html

 

[Postvieww]

No. It never was, or is okay to politize the DOJ. Which is why Obama is being referred to the DOJ.

Obama is being referred to the DOJ for plotting to interfere with Trumps presidency. By promoting a false accusation he knew was false. Sounds treasonous to me.

 

[iluvatar5150]

One thing is clear - Tulsi is back in the club:

“She’s, like, hotter than everybody. She’s the hottest one in the room right now.”

I bet Kristi Noem is gonna be upset that all her plastic surgery failed to win her that title.

 

[iluvatar5150]

Sounds treasonous to me.

Then you should probably do more reading on what Obama actually did and what constitutes treason.