Flat or round earth -The final experiment.

[Phil G]

Different kettle of fish altogether & you know it.

It is not a different kettle of fish and you ought to know it. Both are personal eyewitness testimonies from Christians, disciples of Christ.

 

[Strong in Him]

Why, all's that I was trying to say is, ' I don't believe they've been to moon let alone walked on it'.

But you DID once believe they had walked on the moon - and not that long ago.

What you don't seem to get is that this was not a private, "oh, now I believe they walked on the moon" moment.
You publicly said that you accepted Charles Duke's testimony. You publicly said "sorry" to God for doubting and asked him to bless the astronauts and you publicly said that you would ask God to help you to persevere in this belief. This was a public confession and statement of faith.
Anyone who was browsing on this site during that time, saw your statement but then decided to leave the site, would have left thinking, "Apple Sky changed her mind before God and now believes in the moon landings and a globe earth."

When you make a public confession, you don't then get to, privately, say "sorry God, I changed my mind", start publicly insulting astronauts and calling them liars.
That is why I previously talked of you repenting of having repented. You should at least have the guts to write another prayer saying, "Lord, I'm sorry that I said 'sorry' for doubting the astronauts. All of them - even those who are your children - are liars. What's more, I don't need your help in sticking to my new beliefs, because I don't hold them any more. I prefer to trust Odle, Dubay etc rather than my fellow Christians."

 

[Apple Sky]

I'm at a complete loss as to why I had to go to all that effort just for you to shrug it off.

I don't know what the big deal is & I have every right to be here as you all are.

 

[Strong in Him]

It is when we only have their word for it.

We only have your word for it that a) you exist and b) you really believe in a flat earth and are not doing all of this to wind us up.

 

[Phil G]

I don't know what the big deal is & I have every right to be here as you all are.

You have, but you don't have the right to accuse Christians of lying about their personal eyewitness testimonies and call it hearsay!

By the way "hearsay" is when people relate something they have heard. Direct eyewitness testimony is NOT hearsay.

 

[Apple Sky]

You have, but you don't have the right to accuse Christians of lying about their personal eyewitness testimonies and call it hearsay!

OK I'll pretend that I believe that they've been to the moon & the earth is a spinning globe, happy now ?

 

[Phil G]

OK I'll pretend that I believe that they've been to the moon & the earth is a spinning globe, happy now ?

Stop being sarcastic. People are here making serious points to you and you reply with sarcasm and flippancy.

 

[Phil G]

OK I'll pretend that I believe that they've been to the moon & the earth is a spinning globe, happy now ?

You have accused Christian astronauts, who have related their personal eyewitness testimonies of the shape of the earth being a globe, of hearsay. That is bearing false witness against those astronauts. Their testimonies are not hearsay. They are not relating something that somebody else has said, they are relating what they themselves have seen. That's not hearsay. They are direct eyewitness testimonies, just like we have in Scripture when the disciples spoke and wrote about their eyewitness testimonies on the risen Lord Jesus.

The biblical principle of establishing a true account is to have two or three witnesses. We have that with Christian astronauts. Not only do you bear false witness against Christian astronauts, but you deny a biblical principle of establishing facts.

 

[Apple Sky]

Sorry, what doesn't surprise you? The fact that the link takes me to 153 News, or the fact that I have never heard of 153 News?

That other's here say that it's not a trustworthy source.

 

[Phil G]

That other's here say that it's not a trustworthy source.

Which isn’t surprising because it denies eyewitness testimonies from Christians.

Such a source is absolutely untrustworthy.

 

[Apple Sky]

Which isn’t surprising because it denies eyewitness testimonies from Christians.

Such a source is absolutely untrustworthy.

 

[Phil G]

Again, sarcasm instead of an intelligent point.

 

[David Lamb]

That other's here say that it's not a trustworthy source.

Yes they do, but what about you? What evidence do you have that it is a trustworthy source? (I'm talking generally, about the trustworthiness of 153 News, not specifically what 153 News says about moon landings or the earth's shape.)

 

[trophy33]

Useless, she does not get formal logic and similar. And when she gets in the corner, her emotional distress causes her to stop comprehending what is going on.

You must talk like to a child - emotions, excitement about that she "discovered" something, blind trust towards very specific few people, naivety etc. Rational arguments will not work here.

Therefore, we should take it lightly, with a humor, simply. Long, exhaustive explanations will not work, she does not understand or does not remember them.

 

[prodromos]

Different kettle of fish altogether & you know it.

No, it is exactly the same.

 

[Apple Sky]

What evidence do you have that it is a trustworthy source? (I'm talking generally, about the trustworthiness of 153 News, not specifically what 153 News says about moon landings or the earth's shape.)

I've been on 153 news since forever & I've never had any trouble with it.

 

[Apple Sky]

No, it is exactly the same.

No it's not.

 

[Phil G]

I've been on 153 news since forever & I've never had any trouble with it.

That’s not evidence. It’s just you making a claim

 

[Phil G]

No it's not.

Yes it is. Christian eyewitnesses testifying to what they saw, same for both Christian astronauts (aka disciples of Christ) and the disciples in the Bible. Why can you not understand basic Christianity?

 

[David Lamb]

I've been on 153 news since forever & I've never had any trouble with it.

That doesn't really answer my question, which concerned evidence you have that it is trustworthy source. If you are saying that you have never had any trouble with it because it posts videos that support what you already believe about moon landings, shape of the earth, etc. that is just arguing in circles.