I'd have to say that we are so unlike God, that the word, "intend" (or most other words we use to imply human concepts), don't really work the same way as we think of them. For example, when in Scripture something is translated "want", or when what-to-us-human emoting is expressed, "...how I wish that you would have...", (it is usually an anthropomorphism, which is ok for God to do, but when we do it, very questionable; we see everything backwards (but I digress).), we would probably do well to say something along the lines of, "God did what he did on purpose.", since logically if he is first cause, nothing can happen by accident.
So, yes and no, as I see it. The word, "intend", can still be taken to mean something that does not necessarily come about. But when God "intended" all the evil that occurs, there is no question as to whether or not every detail specifically was planned and caused, and sure to come about. (Every detail, after all, is part of what goes into makeup, or 'flavor', of the members and the whole of the Bride of Christ.)
Also, most often misconstrued by those of a philosophically self-deterministic mindset, to say that something negative was "intended" by God, the lack of the positive in the human meaning of it is taken way extreme. For example, to say, "Not only were the Elect predestined to believe and be saved, but the reprobate were predestined to 'destruction'" is inferred as implicative of that end predetermined for them in and of itself for its own reason--that God created them for that mere purpose, which is, of course, ridiculous. He has a reason for every detail that results of his creating.
