- Jun 25, 2008
- 16,862
- 4,233
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Married
Newsom wins: Trump must give control of National Guard to California, judge rules
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
This will probably be overturned. Under title 10 Trump has every right to call the NG to defend federal agents and/or federal property.
Newsom wins: Trump must give control of National Guard to California, judge rules
Thank you for your insight.This will probably be overturned. Under title 10 Trump has every right to call the NG to defend federal agents and/or federal property.
What about Trump keeps control of California National Guard for now after appeals court blocks order
Newsom wins: Trump must give control of National Guard to California, judge rules
Exactly where in Title 10 does it give the National Guard the ability to act in a law enforcement capacity? They can in Title 32 but they are under the control of the state Governor.This will probably be overturned. Under title 10 Trump has every right to call the NG to defend federal agents and/or federal property.
Did I say anything about title 10 giving the NG law enforcement powers? Do you think you got an aha moment or are you just being disingenuous?Exactly where in Title 10 does it give the National Guard the ability to act in a law enforcement capacity? They can in Title 32 but they are under the control of the state Governor.
No, you said "Trump has every right to call the NG to defend federal agents and/or federal property." Title 10 does not give the President the authority to use the National Guard in a law enforcement capacity, which is what was occurring in LA.Did I say anything about title 10 giving the NG law enforcement powers? Do you think you got an aha moment or are you just being disingenuous?
That is exactly what I said.No, you said "Trump has every right to call the NG to defend federal agents and/or federal property."
Never said nor argued that.Title 10 does not give the President the authority to use the National Guard in a law enforcement capacity, which is what was occurring in LA.
That is correct.Title 32 does give the NG that ability but it must be under the authority of the state Governor.
Yes but you are incorrect.That is exactly what I said.
That was the capacity which they were used in LA.Never said nor argued that.
How so?Yes but you are incorrect.
What capacity was the NG used in LA according to you?That was the capacity which they were used in LA.
You said. "Under title 10 Trump has every right to call the NG to defend federal agents and/or federal property."How so?
As law enforcement working with the LAPD.What capacity was the NG used in LA according to you?