• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Federal judge declares sections of Arkansas’ library obscenity law unconstitutional

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
45,200
48,086
Los Angeles Area
✟1,071,583.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
LINK

Brooks previously blocked the challenged sections on a temporary basis in July 2023, days before the law went into effect. He wrote in his 49-page ruling at the time that the challenged text was too vague and could lead to arbitrary interpretation and “content-based restrictions.” <--government censorship

“This ruling by Judge Brooks affirms the values that CALS librarians and, I believe, most of our citizens hold dear — namely that our Constitution does not deputize city boards or quorum courts, or librarians like me for that matter — to be the agents of government censorship by allowing any of us to remove or restrict access to books when some people in our community find the content or ideas in those books objectionable,” [plaintiff Nate] Coulter said in a statement.

The two Crawford County defendants, along with the county quorum court and library director, lost a separate First Amendment lawsuit in September. U.S. District Judge P.K. Holmes ruled in favor of three parents who claimed the Crawford County Library’s segregation of LGBTQ+ children’s books into separate “social sections” violated the First Amendment.
 

Zaha Torte

Jesus Christ is the Eternal God
May 6, 2024
1,994
862
40
Not Hispanic or Latino
✟45,170.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Latter-Day Saint
Marital Status
Married
LINK

Brooks previously blocked the challenged sections on a temporary basis in July 2023, days before the law went into effect. He wrote in his 49-page ruling at the time that the challenged text was too vague and could lead to arbitrary interpretation and “content-based restrictions.” <--government censorship

“This ruling by Judge Brooks affirms the values that CALS librarians and, I believe, most of our citizens hold dear — namely that our Constitution does not deputize city boards or quorum courts, or librarians like me for that matter — to be the agents of government censorship by allowing any of us to remove or restrict access to books when some people in our community find the content or ideas in those books objectionable,” [plaintiff Nate] Coulter said in a statement.

The two Crawford County defendants, along with the county quorum court and library director, lost a separate First Amendment lawsuit in September. U.S. District Judge P.K. Holmes ruled in favor of three parents who claimed the Crawford County Library’s segregation of LGBTQ+ children’s books into separate “social sections” violated the First Amendment.
I don't get it. What's the violation?
 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
45,200
48,086
Los Angeles Area
✟1,071,583.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
I don't get it. What's the violation?

It falls afoul of First Amendment protections.

1735079863172.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: RileyG
Upvote 0

Zaha Torte

Jesus Christ is the Eternal God
May 6, 2024
1,994
862
40
Not Hispanic or Latino
✟45,170.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Latter-Day Saint
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Red Team - Moderator
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
39,412
22,434
30
Nebraska
✟914,790.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
The law is about removing books, not 'not having' them.
Fun fact: my very small midwestern hometown I grew up in (population ~1,000) library had a copy of Mein Kampf by Adolf Hitler.

I don’t know if anyone checked it out, but for some odd reason I remember seeing it on the shelves many years later.

(I don’t know where public libraries store all their books or how they’re rotated. I find it a fascinating subject, if anything)
 
Upvote 0