Trump to Take Down the Left-Wing Censorship Cabal

[essentialsaltes]

Oh my gosh what a coincidence! I had been getting the feeling for years that's how the left viewed the right. Basic Republican type speakers not allowed to speak at Universities and a host of other things. Funny eh?

What, I have a right to speak at a University? Cool!

 

[HARK!]

I heard Vance allude that we would withdraw from NATO if the EU continues to attack free speech.

I can't find that interview on Youtube; but they too are Left-Wing arbiters of censorship.

 

[Belk]

It would be nice if all this was about principle. It will almost certainly be just about interests.

Not a word I associate with a Trump lead effort.

 

[HARK!]

Some are getting on board in the UK.

 

[HARK!]

Nationalists

I'm OK with cultural diversity. I don't subscribe to the agenda of some of these Globalists, of beating down every nation in the world into bowing down to Wokism.

Can we still respect each other despite any differences that we might have in opinion?

 

[Always in His Presence]

Are not "liberal corporate propagandists" people? If you prick them, do they not bleed? If you tickle them, do they not laugh? If you poison them, do they not die? And if you wrong them, shall they not revenge?

-- A2SG, not sure exactly how tyrannical PBS has been, though, to be honest.....

If you expose them, will they not cry and whine?
If you support exercise of freedom of expression - will they not do their best to shut you down?
If you set standards will they not accuse you of dehumanizing them?

It's why X has a new owner and FB has had to answer to congress multiple times.

 

[probinson]

End free speech now!

 

[HARK!]

 

[Always in His Presence]

There has to be a whole lot of nervous people out there.

 

[Always in His Presence]

What, I have a right to speak at a University? Cool!

You sure do - Charlie Kirk does it all the time.

What University will you be speaking at?

 

[Sif]

I'm OK with cultural diversity. I don't subscribe to the agenda of some of these Globalists, of beating down every nation in the world into bowing down to Wokism.

Can we still respect each other despite any differences that we might have in opinion?

Not a fan of Globalism or Wokism myself. I am not a Liberal, nor am I a Conservative.

I am not sure; can we still respect difference of opinion? Jury seems to still be out on that one.

However, I need to remember my past rather negative encounters with Christians and that they are in the past and involved a handful of individuals and do not reflect views/opinions/actions of the entire group.

 

[essentialsaltes]

At least it's not Kash Patel at CIA.

 

[durangodawood]

You sure do - Charlie Kirk does it all the time.

What University will you be speaking at?

You can set up your soapbox on the quad. I think you have that right on a public U.

 

[essentialsaltes]

You sure do - Charlie Kirk does it all the time.

No, he gets invited to particular events. He does not have a legal right to do so.

 

[essentialsaltes]

You can set up your soapbox on the quad. I think you have that right on a public U.

Certainly Brother Jed and I shared a few words from time to time on Bruin Walk.

 

[durangodawood]

Certainly Brother Jed and I shared a few words from time to time on Bruin Walk.

At (other high end public U) there used to be this guy with a whole spiel and presentation boards about how Stephen King actually killed John Lennon, on orders from Ronald Reagan. If he had a right to be there I guess anyone does.

 

[HARK!]

CEO Mark Thompson will lay off tons of employees to cut costs and streamline CNN for digital platforms. Some on-camera anchors and talents are reportedly slated to be fired as part of these cuts.

CNN to Fire Major Stars as Part of Layoffs

Just after news broke of Chris Wallace ditching CNN, the network is now slated to cut “hundreds of jobs,” according to a new report from Puck News’ Dylan Byers. The outlet, which is a frequent news-breaker when it comes to TV news shakeups, reports that CNN’s CEO Mark Thompson will lay off tons...

popculture.com

CNN’s primetime ratings cratered 92% the day after presidential debate: Nielsen​

CNN’s primetime ratings cratered 92% the day after presidential debate: Nielsen

In the advertiser-coveted 25-to-54 demographic, the ratings plummeted a jaw-dropping 96%, the data found.

nypost.com

May the mouthpiece for the Globalists R.I.P..

Hopefully MSDNC will follow suit. People are turning to social media to get the real news. The Authoritarian mind control spell has been broken.

 

[HARK!]

Hopefully MSDNC will follow suit

...and so it is so.

MSNBC saw its audience crater on Thursday, just days after the left-of-center network beat CNN in election night ratings for the first time ever.


Thursday’s total average daily viewers on Fox News came in at 2.6 million and 375,000 in the coveted 25-54 age demographic, according to Nielsen data. Meanwhile, MSNBC brought in only 596,000 total viewers and 71,000 in the demo. CNN brought in 419,000 total viewers on Thursday and 91,000 viewers in the demo.

MSN

 

[A2SG]

I think there would be fewer prisoners in prison if it was OK to revenge. Forgiveness would be a more peaceful approach.

Can't argue with that.

-- A2SG, still, people will be people......

 

[A2SG]

If you expose them, will they not cry and whine?
If you support exercise of freedom of expression - will they not do their best to shut you down?

Are we still talking about PBS here? I don't recall any attempts on PBS' part to shut down anyone, let alone that they have the power to do so. Maybe you could be more specific about what you're claiming here, it would help.

If you set standards will they not accuse you of dehumanizing them?

It's why X has a new owner and FB has had to answer to congress multiple times.

Just so I'm clear here...do you think private businesses like social media platforms have a legal obligation to print or host anything and everything someone wants them to? No matter what?

-- A2SG, should this board abandon its TOS if some people want to post stuff that might be objectionable to those who pay to manage this site?