Man at Kamala rally thrown out and mocked for saying Jesus is Lord

[FreeinChrist]

but the cut is literally cutting out the Jesus is Lord

Oh, actually in that clip, you can STILL HEAR the "Jesus is Lord!"
Yes the "lies lies lies" is being said, and she's kinda laughing it off.
But when you can hear the "Jesus is Lord!" her face changes

Here's how she's reacting to "lies, lies lies!"
View attachment 356261

and then when she hears "Jesus is Lord!" her reaction changes to:

View attachment 356262

She absolutely heard it, her reaction changes when she hears it.

time mark 14-16s

She reacted to the 'lies' comments. Saying she is mocking God or Christianity is unfounded.

 

[Truth7t7]

She reacted to the 'lies' comments. Saying she is mocking God or Christianity is unfounded.

How could professing Christians in America support and defend Kamala Harris that's pro abortion in killing the innocent unborn and pro same sex marriage in homosexuality?

 

[Jamdoc]

She reacted to the 'lies' comments. Saying she is mocking God or Christianity is unfounded.

the "wrong rally" comment comes immediately after the "Jesus is Lord"
people were chanting lies lies lies for several seconds prior with no real reaction aside from smiling and laughing.

 

[childeye 2]

"Slander" is that an amphibian related to the salamander?

No.

My holy Bible teaches there are evil people in the world and Kamala Harris through her actions and words in support of Abortion, and Same Sex Marriage to name a few, she would be one

Thank you for providing some facts concerning Harris. It now cannot be said the post is slandering Harris.

Sin has entered into mankind. The law condemns sin. I believe that righteousness comes by grace through faith and not through the works of the law. Any reasoning that ends in hypocritical judgment will not be just nor merciful, and will not fulfill loving others as oneself, and is therefore evil (destructive) on some level.

So Harris supports a woman's right to say what will happen within her body as pertains to her pregnancy as articulated under Roe vs Wade. She's also against discrimination against gay people as far as their deserving of equal rights and protections under the law.

However, Trump so happens to also support states' rights to abortion and he is self-admittedly a person motivated by greed and carnal lust and is known to have tried to get Pence to not certify valid votes just so that he could stay in power. Currently he is slandering migrants and talking about sending the army to attack "the enemy within" (political rivals who disagree with him like Adam Schiff and Nancy Pelosi).

Now we all have some level of sin, and in keeping true to loving others as ourselves we all will be judged by what measure we use to judge others. My judgment according to the facts declared above, is that they clearly show that Harris will serve justice and mercy, but Trump won't.

 

[Aldebaran]

SPECIFICALLY, PLEASE TRY TO REFRAIN FROM PERSONAL ATTACKS. ADDRESS POSTS RATHER THAN POSTERS​

 

[lismore]

How could professing Christians in America support and defend Kamala Harris that's pro abortion in killing the innocent unborn and pro same sex marriage in homosexuality?

Agreed!

Jeremiah 1:5 “Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, before you were born I set you apart; I appointed you as a prophet to the nations.”

Luke 1: 41 When Elizabeth heard Mary’s greeting, the baby leaped in her womb, and Elizabeth was filled with the Holy Spirit.

 

[Jamdoc]

I think there's a place for *some* a *minority* of Abortions
like
Ectopic "pregnancy" where it's not viable you can't have the child develop in the fallopian tubes, it ruptures and the mother bleeds out internally if nothing is done
or, a miscarriage that doesn't complete and they have to remove the fetus' dead corpse before it gets infected and makes the mother septic, and in general, once the water breaks? That pregnancy is over. You either try to deliver and save the baby or if it's not viable.. it's a tragedy but better to have 1 tragedy rather than 2. But if the water breaks the sterile barrier protecting the baby is gone, you can't just leave it in there.
and those kinds of definitions need to be clear so that a doctor can act when needed rather than sit inactive afraid of prosecution.

The thing that has to be considered is it's not "thou shalt not kill" in general, it's "thou shalt not murder" that is, killing with malicious intent, you hate this person and want them gone. But if it's they have to do something or it'll kill the mother that's not murder. Or if it's a fatal anomaly of the fetus and there's no way that baby will survive (IE missing vital organs at 30+ weeks, certain fatal trisomies or missing Chromosomes (not down's syndrome, those babies can be happy and live relatively normal lives, totally worth having)

But these situations are not the norm, and they need to be defined in the laws rather than just "no abortions, no exceptions"

 

[Michie]

I think there's a place for *some* a *minority* of Abortions
like
Ectopic "pregnancy" where it's not viable you can't have the child develop in the fallopian tubes, it ruptures and the mother bleeds out internally if nothing is done
or, a miscarriage that doesn't complete and they have to remove the fetus' dead corpse before it gets infected and makes the mother septic, and in general, once the water breaks? That pregnancy is over. You either try to deliver and save the baby or if it's not viable.. it's a tragedy but better to have 1 tragedy rather than 2. But if the water breaks the sterile barrier protecting the baby is gone, you can't just leave it in there.
and those kinds of definitions need to be clear so that a doctor can act when needed rather than sit inactive afraid of prosecution.

The thing that has to be considered is it's not "thou shalt not kill" in general, it's "thou shalt not murder" that is, killing with malicious intent, you hate this person and want them gone. But if it's they have to do something or it'll kill the mother that's not murder. Or if it's a fatal anomaly of the fetus and there's no way that baby will survive (IE missing vital organs at 30+ weeks, certain fatal trisomies or missing Chromosomes (not down's syndrome, those babies can be happy and live relatively normal lives, totally worth having)

But these situations are not the norm, and they need to be defined in the laws rather than just "no abortions, no exceptions"

Ugh! An ectopic pregnancy is not an abortion. My doctor told me the same. It’s a medical emergency. Not a procured abortion for hire. Don’t listen to the propaganda.

 

[Jamdoc]

Ugh! An ectopic pregnancy is not an abortion. My doctor told me the same. It’s a medical emergency. Not a procured abortion for hire. Don’t listen to the propaganda.

and yet it's the abortion laws that are basically stopping the doctors from acting on those things until it's like, it ruptures and she's actively bleeding out. One happened in Texas, they wouldn't operate on the Ectopic Pregnancy because of the abortion ban.

 

[Michie]

and yet it's the abortion laws that are basically stopping the doctors from acting on those things until it's like, it ruptures and she's actively bleeding out. One happened in Texas, they wouldn't operate on the Ectopic Pregnancy because of the abortion ban.

That’s a medical emergency. Any doctor will tell you that is not abortion. I’ve been through it. I know. As far as Texas, pure idiocy because of the propaganda. Ectopic pregnancies are not viable.

 

[FaithT]

That’s a medical emergency. Any doctor will tell you that is not abortion. I’ve been through it. I know. As far as Texas, pure idiocy because of the propaganda. Ectopic pregnancies are not viable.

My friend had an ectopic pregnancy years ago and had to have her tube removed which was at a Catholic hospital. One of our deacons is an anesthesiologist at a Catholic hospital (same one as the one who treated my friend). During his homily this past weekend he made it clear that BY LAW they have to treat a woman having an ectopic pregnancy by performing surgery

 

[Michie]

My friend had an ectopic pregnancy years ago and had to have her tube removed which was at a Catholic hospital. One of our deacons is an anesthesiologist at a Catholic hospital (same one as the one who treated my friend). During his homily this past weekend he made it clear that BY LAW they have to treat a woman having an ectopic pregnancy by performing surgery

Exactly. I bled out and almost died. My left tube was removed as well.

 

[FaithT]

Exactly. I bled out and almost died. My left tube was removed as well.

I’m glad you made it in time.

 

[Michie]

I’m glad you made it in time.

It was a close call.

 

[Jamdoc]

That’s a medical emergency. Any doctor will tell you that is not abortion. I’ve been through it. I know. As far as Texas, pure idiocy because of the propaganda. Ectopic pregnancies are not viable.

Yeah, I'm aware, but because of no exceptions laws doctors will be hesitant to act because they fear prosecution.
Basically the laws need to have these exceptions in them and not be vague, so that a doctor can act when there's something that is non viable and can lead to a medical emergency before it actually is a threat to the life like I said. a woman's water breaks at 20 weeks or something like that. There's no way that's viable, and you need to get that out now before she goes septic.

Because that's happened too, they had to wait for sepsis to act, one got uterine scarring that rendered her sterile. This was also Texas.

 

[Michie]

Yeah, I'm aware, but because of no exceptions laws doctors will be hesitant to act because they fear prosecution.
Basically the laws need to have these exceptions in them and not be vague, so that a doctor can act when there's something that is non viable and can lead to a medical emergency before it actually is a threat to the life like I said. a woman's water breaks at 20 weeks or something like that. There's no way that's viable, and you need to get that out now before she goes septic.

Because that's happened too, they had to wait for sepsis to act, one got uterine scarring that rendered her sterile. This was also Texas.

I don’t know what you are reading or what wacko doctors are doing because they do not bother to inform themselves but again. Medical emergency. Nothing stops them from acting in a medical emergency regardless of how the twisted versions of what happened are being reported. By law they can treat all medical emergencies, pregnant or not. It’s propaganda. There is always more to the story.

 

[Jamdoc]

I don’t know what you are reading or what wacko doctors are doing because they do not bother to inform themselves but again. Medical emergency. Nothing stops them from acting in a medical emergency regardless of how the twisted versions of what happened are being reported. By law they can treat all medical emergencies, pregnant or not. It’s propaganda. There is always more to the story.

well in these cases, the doctors felt like they could not act until the tube actually ruptured, and until the woman became septic.

like the Texas laws are vague enough that these doctors felt like they could not act unless the mother was actually dying, even if they could forsee that the pregnancy was non viable, and the mother's life would soon be at risk, it wasn't immediately at risk right then and there. It was a matter of hours or days not minutes.

these things need to be in the law, and well defined so that a doctor is not questioning whether to act out of fear of prosecution.

 

[Michie]

well in these cases, the doctors felt like they could not act until the tube actually ruptured, and until the woman became septic.

like the Texas laws are vague enough that these doctors felt like they could not act unless the mother was actually dying, even if they could forsee that the pregnancy was non viable, and the mother's life would soon be at risk, it wasn't immediately at risk right then and there. It was a matter of hours or days not minutes.

these things need to be in the law, and well defined so that a doctor is not questioning whether to act out of fear of prosecution.

Those doctors were complete idiots. You are always allowed to act in a medical emergency.

 

[Jamdoc]

Those doctors were complete idiots. You are always allowed to act in a medical emergency.

if "medical emergency" isn't defined well enough in the law then they don't know when they can act. Is ectopic pregnancy considered medical emergency on diagnosis or on rupture? That particular case the doctors claimed there was a possibility that the pregnancy could still be viable, they denied care, the woman went somewhere else, and those doctors acted saying it was already rupturing.

 

[Michie]

if "medical emergency" isn't defined well enough in the law then they don't know when they can act. Is ectopic pregnancy considered medical emergency on diagnosis or on rupture? That particular case the doctors claimed there was a possibility that the pregnancy could still be viable, they denied care, the woman went somewhere else, and those doctors acted saying it was already rupturing.

On diagnosis. Something must be done before rupture. Ectopic pregnancy is not viable.