Kamala Harris interviewed by Brett Baier

[o_mlly]

I haven't looked it up because I don't care.

Bingo. Standard blaster response when he/she has no answer.

There are no attempt to create a statistical sample in the presidential historian polls of presidential "rank".

OK. Then why did someone post that unfounded study to this thread as if it was informative?

Speaking of non-facts. Trump didn't "retire" Gen. Milley.

Note that I put retire in quotation marks. Are you unaware of the public disagreements that the woke general had with his commanding officer?

Frankly you are doing a lot of demanding answers ,...

I only make reasonable demand for answers when someone post as fact that which is rubbish.

... but won't reciprocate and instead express your subjective opinions.

Surely you have examples of that outrageous accusation. Let's see them.

 

[Yarddog]

Lol. Mkay.

The questions were yes or no questions.

Um…okay.

You think, despite the evidence to the contrary, that she actually answered questions. So it’s either ignorance or something else.

Yes, she answered questions. I gave your the definition of answer and no where does it say that an answer must be yes or no.lol

 

[Hammster]

Yes, she answered questions. I gave your the definition of answer and no where does it say that an answer must be yes or no.lol

So why even do an interview if the questions are all ignored?

 

[Bradskii]

So, you don't need any facts? Therefore, you are biased and your feelings can just as easily be dismissed as rubbish.

I mentioned the opinions of Republicans, those who worked closely with him and his family members. The facts of what he says and what he has done are what those opinions are based on.

If you think what he says and what he has done is acceptable then that's your call.

 

[Bradskii]

I didn't bring it up...

No. Trump did. But if people think it's suitable for a presidential candidate in a rally full of women and children to talk for 15 minutes about a guys penis then it just shows how low the bar has dropped. Actually, I don't think that you even have a bar any more. If it's still there it's now down in the mud. There is no limit to how low this can go.

 

[Bradskii]

Instead of quote mining, how about answering my question honestly?

You really think I was defending people who commit crimes and sexually assault women? Really? Do I have to explain this again?

The guy who is telling you that people like that must be sent from the country is himself one of those people. The irony is off the scale. I don't know that it can actually still be called irony any more. There must be another word for it. It's like Epstein saying that we should clamp down on sexual predators.

Doesn't this register with you?

 

[Yarddog]

So why even do an interview if the questions are all ignored?

So she could, hopefully, find some Fox viewers that have some sense.lol

 

[Hans Blaster]

Note that I put retire in quotation marks. Are you unaware of the public disagreements that the woke general had with his commanding officer?

Milley's career was unimpeded by Trump. Trump did exactly nothing to him. You claim is bogus in or out of quotes.

 

[Hans Blaster]

Bingo. Standard blaster response when he/she has no answer.

Really, you reply to me in the third person. To quote Jar Jar -- "How wude."

OK. Then why did someone post that unfounded study to this thread as if it was informative?

I don't know, why don't you ask them. You're the one all hot and bothered by the survey of

Note that I put retire in quotation marks. Are you unaware of the public disagreements that the woke general had with his commanding officer?

I only make reasonable demand for answers when someone post as fact that which is rubbish.

In this case you wanted a "fact" backing for something that was clearly an opinion.

Surely you have examples of that outrageous accusation. Let's see them.

They are left behind like footprints all throughout.

 

[o_mlly]

I mentioned the opinions of Republicans, those who worked closely with him and his family members. The facts of what he says and what he has done are what those opinions are based on.

Try, as you will, to mask opinions from academics as facts, you're still wrong. Facts have staying power, opinions do not. Did you not read your study? I did. Note the numerous changes in ranking in prior years. That's evidence of just how ephemeral opinions are.

 

[Yeshua HaDerekh]

No. Trump did. But if people think it's suitable for a presidential candidate in a rally full of women and children to talk for 15 minutes about a guys penis then it just shows how low the bar has dropped. Actually, I don't think that you even have a bar any more. If it's still there it's now down in the mud. There is no limit to how low this can go.

Um, that's not what he did in the video I saw. No one there seemed to care actually. Even the Amish in PA are all voting for Trump...

 

[o_mlly]

Milley's career was unimpeded by Trump

Nonsense. Milley tangled with his boss to the point that he was called before the House to account for his actions.

Really, you reply to me in the third person. To quote Jar Jar -- "How wude."

Another non-answer.

I don't know, why don't you ask them.

I did.

In this case you wanted a "fact" backing for something that was clearly an opinion.

Thank you for an honest admission. Now, tell that to your bud, Bradskii and instruct him to cease his feeble attempts to claim otherwise.

They are left behind like footprints all throughout.

Translation: "I've got nothing to back up my scurrilous claims about you."

 

[Hans Blaster]

Nonsense. Milley tangled with his boss to the point that he was called before the House to account for his actions.

So why was it that he completed his term and left the Joint Chiefs on the day you would have predicted on his swearing in day? (In other words, Gen. Milley was not "retired" by Trump in any way, shape or form.)

 

[o_mlly]

So why was it that he completed his term ...

November 3, 2020.

 

[Hammster]

So she could, hopefully, find some Fox viewers that have some sense.lol

Thanks for admitting that she ignored the questions. That was my point all along.

 

[Yarddog]

Thanks for admitting that she ignored the questions. That was my point all along.

I guess you didn't read what I wrote. She was trying to reach people that watch Fox and give them the truth. Too many believe what the Fox pundits say and don't actually listen to better sources.

 

[Bradskii]

Um, that's not what he did in the video I saw. No one there seemed to care actually.

So no-one there actually cared out about something he didn't do.

 

[Yeshua HaDerekh]

So no-one there actually cared out about something he didn't do.

No one cared about what he DID say Einstein...oy vey

 

[Bradskii]

Try, as you will, to mask opinions from academics as facts, you're still wrong.

Again, their opinions are based on facts. What he has said and what he has done. It's all on record. Tapes, videos, emails, Twitter...have you read any of Jack Smith's 165 page brief on Trump trying to reverse the election result? I recommend that you don't.

 

[Bradskii]

No one cared about what he DID say Einstein...oy vey

Cut out the baiting, please. I'm asking nicely.