Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Exactly. They were teenage kids. I think after watching a couple of videos it seems they called her a liar. When they were escorted out, I think they said Jesus is Lord. I posted them the the general politics section of this forum.
It looks to me like people can't discern God from the devil. The Spirit of Christ would not lead people to slander other people. It's wickedness to even want to believe bad things said about others.
Agree.
yes, unless you have congress willing to vote themselves out of power and the supreme court willingly disbanding themselves to give the Executive branch supreme authority, Project 2025 has a snowball's chance in hell of being implemented. About all he could do is exchange sitting bureaucrats with new appointees which is in the President's constitutional power (however it has to be confirmed by the Senate, another check and balance) it's just generally not used because replacing experienced personnel with inexperienced new appointees is not politically expedient and would cause hiccups in how our government works while the new people catch up. If a vacancy in say the FBI or CIA opens up, the President can appoint people he wants but the senate has to confirm it and with the senate democrat controlled he would have to make compromises.
Her position is clearly articulated as ---> NOT for government being empowered to dictate whether a person can/should get an abortion or not. I don't see her peddling propaganda.Her view on abortion is pretty well documented, clearly not propaganda and absolutely inconsistent with anyone who claims to be a believer in Jesus Christ. God Bless You
I intended no such euphemism. To be clear, The Holy Spirit instructs me to love others as I would want to be loved. In accordance, He does not instruct me to see a person who obtains an abortion as a cold-blooded murderer, but rather as a person who was motivated out of a form of fear. Therefore, when I see people who do see them as cold-blooded murderers, He also tempers my judgment by bringing to mind that we will be judged by what measure we use to judge others, and that the merciful will receive mercy.
The US constitution clearly defines "Other" and the US has laws concerning lawful immigration, stand in line
Kamala Harris had 3.5 years to let illegal immigrants in and she did a good job at setting new records
As stated the US constitution defines "Other" and that's a person not born on US soil, pretty simple
Wikipedia: The Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-212) is a United States law that recognizes an embryo or fetus in utero as a legal victim, if they are injured or killed during the commission of any of over 60 listed federal crimes of violence. The law defines "child in utero" as "a member of the species Homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb."[1]
God's law also recognizes the fetus as a legal victim.
"Other" is what people make it. Years ago, it was the Irish, or the Italians. The nineteenth century had signs that said "Help Wanted, No Irish need apply". They legally immigrated but were not wanted. Blacks were, and sometimes are, 'other'. Yet, many are desended from slaves that were in America before 1776.
Hello! Imho it's a clear case of protecting innocent lives. I'm not talking about how you personally relate to people who've had an abortion, I'm talking about it not being possible to kill the innocent in the first place. If someone was to rip a new born baby apart you perhaps wouldn't be so reticent, perhaps the obfuscation is because you see the unborn child as less human? God Bless
I get that. That's why I've already said, "crafting laws to force women to carry their babies to term". Why? ---> To protect innocent lives. I understand your sentiments.
This has been the recurring issue throughout recorded history. I also note that History shows that writing and trying to enforce laws intended to stop abortions has never made it impossible to get an abortion.
While I agree that the argument can be made that there are degrees of human development, I do not see the unborn as less human in any stage of development. I must assume that because you asked me the question, you're probably unaware that I am pro-life because I believe that if a woman carries her child to term, she eventually will be glad that she didn't have an abortion.If someone was to rip a new born baby apart you perhaps wouldn't be so reticent, perhaps the obfuscation is because you see the unborn child as less human? God Bless
You have provided nothing that wasn't already known
You can't just blame Harris for immigrants who enter illegally. They sneak in the same as when they did so under Trump, Obama and Bush, etc...
