Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
For the political purpose of disrupting an event.How was it used in vain?
Now, now-- under Reformed Theology, politics is very much intertwined with religious-life.For the political purpose of disrupting an event.
I dont really see that as "in vain" anymore tho. Religious sentiments are meant for partisan reinforcement. Thats their purpose nowadays.
Yes, it was a violation of the 11th Commandment.Along with Christians who might not agree with the phrase being used in that heckling way at a political rally.
How were you able to determine that it was used that way?For the political purpose of disrupting an event.
I dont really see that as "in vain" anymore tho. Religious sentiments are meant for partisan reinforcement. Thats their purpose nowadays.
Sure. But I see politics taking the lead in many peoples lives. Politics leads faith, and faith goes where politics demands - even right into a pit of lies.Now, now-- under Reformed Theology, politics is very much intertwined with religious-life.
I don't disagree with you; personally, I'm rather glad that I cannot vote in this election.Sure. But I see politics taking the lead in many peoples lives. Politics leads faith, and faith goes where politics demands - even right into a pit of lies.
Mainly in the way people assent to lies.How were you able to determine that it was used that way?
Okay, but how did you determine that particular person used it that way?Mainly in the way people assent to lies.
Proper faith should hold truth above politics. Instead, many of faith have elected to walk into a bizarre "funhouse" of mirrors and illusions, because politics asked it of them. But thats my outsiders perspective.
Well its disruptive on the face of it, shouting stuff when someone else is speaking. But maybe the person had a tic that just makes them shout it. Could be, I suppose.Okay, but how did you determine that particular person used it that way?
No. They’re monotheists.So Jews are pagans? I didn’t know.
Ok , I'll play . Show me how declaring faith in Christ in the midst of a crowd cheering the murder of babies is profane or in vain. I am all eyes and ears please enlighten me,
Because showboating like this isn't done for the sake of the audience; it's done to stroke the ego of the person doing the showboating. The same is true of most street preaching, most drive-by tract distribution, and many other evangelistic tactics popular with fundamentalists that encourage the evangelist to be loud, boastful, and/or intrusive for a moment without requiring any sort of follow up or discipleship.How was it used in vain?
I wonder if Harris even knows who Krishna is.The issue is testable. Try going to one of her rallies and start shouting "Krishna is Lord" at random and see what happens.
Given her mother is Indian, its probably fair to assume she has some knowledge of Hinduism.I wonder if Harris even knows who Krishna is.
Nah it should just be a message to to Christians; this ain't that kinda rally, this ain't that kind of administration. Which is difficult for some Christians to hear straight from the horse's mouth, even thought they probably knew it already.More pearl clutching by people who already made their minds up in this election.
Someone clearly not going to vote for Harris goes to her rally, is disruptive and gets called out for it. Oh noes!
My guess is that the Christians at that rally to support Harris will disagree with your assessment.Nah it should just be a message to to Christians; this ain't that kinda rally, this ain't that kind of administration. Which is difficult for some Christians to hear straight from the horse's mouth, even thought they probably knew it already.
That's actually a myth. the reason is to show potential funders/backers/donaters that they are popular enough to be worth donating to for future indulgences when they get into power. This is why Mr Trump is so focussed on 'numbers' (aside from the obvious).Not to nitpick, but: I thought the whole point of rallies were to persuade those who are 'clearly not' going to vote for you?
I'd say probably more like argue against it than disagree with it. At least not deep down. Not in their heart of hearts.My guess is that the Christians at that rally to support Harris will disagree with your assessment.