That's always the answer for the left.
And this appears to always be the answer for the right: lie about immigrants, demonize them, and treat them as if they're subhuman. Of the two options, I'd prefer the one with open arms and an open checkbook, because yes, it is morally superior.
More federal aid. More money, more taxes which now puts a strain on everyone.
Was 2016 really that bad? Without Trump's tax cuts, we'd have an extra trillion-or-so dollars in the treasury by now. How much good could we have done with an extra trillion dollars? Instead, it's mostly sitting in the pockets of people who already had a lot of money.
The better answer is to not let them in in the first place.
Why is that the better answer?
The Democrats are creating a problem.
Dems are creating global poverty that motivates people to want to move here?
And their answer is always to fix the problem they created by spending more money. My money, my children's money, my grand children's money on things we DONT need to spend money on. Failing to close the boarder causes far more problems than infrastructure problems.
You know what that money does? It doesn't just sit under a mattress. It goes into the community and stimulates economic development. Many small cities don't have enough people to do anything more than stagnate. I've never been to Springfield, but I did grow up in a declining post-industrial rust belt town of nearly identical size, so I think I have some idea of what it's probably like. Without new people to juice things, they could spend decades trying to turn things around, like my hometown or the next one over have been. The county I grew up in has been treading water for 30 years, and it's only the cities that have even managed to do that "well." The rural areas are even worse off.
The US birth rate is below the replacement rate. Without more immigration, our country's population will shrink. As that happens, folks will continue to coalesce around cities (including in suburban and exurban areas), while the rural areas will continue to hollow out and continue to lose services like hospitals and schools, because there won't be enough people to support their existence. Is that what you want? That's not what I want. Because, believe it or not, as much I as like the amenities of Big City life, I would like small, non-megalopolis cities and towns to be a viable option for folks who want to have a career and raise kids in an enriching environment filled with hope and opportunity, instead of the stagnancy and complacency that often comes with living in a place where nothing changes.