• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

'Threat to democracy' or media phantom? Christian nationalism debate takes violent turn

Michie

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
185,244
67,918
Woods
✟6,134,534.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Evangelicals wrestle with language, political agendas, potential 'fusion of Christianity and the state'

Editors' note: This is part 17 of The Christian Post's year-long articles series "Politics in the Pews: Evangelical Christian engagement in elections from the Moral Majority to today." In this series, we will look at issues pertaining to election integrity and new ways of getting out the vote, including churches participating in ballot collection. We'll also look at issues Evangelicals say matter most to them ahead of the presidential election and the political engagement of diverse groups, politically and ethnically. Read other articles in the series by clicking here.

What happens when "one nation under God" becomes "one God over a nation"?

That's essentially the question at the heart of the controversy surrounding Christian nationalism — what it is, what it isn't, and who, exactly, stands to benefit from such a movement. Is it everyday American Christians in the pews, or is there some other agenda at work?

Before the gunsmoke had barely cleared this summer in Butler, Pennsylvania, after the assassination attempt against former President Donald Trump, mainstream media outlets characterized the response of Trump's Christian supporters and the outpouring of prayers for the former and potentially next president of the United States as a form of Christian nationalism.

Continued below.
 

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,572
12,028
Georgia
✟1,115,554.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Evangelicals wrestle with language, political agendas, potential 'fusion of Christianity and the state'

Editors' note: This is part 17 of The Christian Post's year-long articles series "Politics in the Pews: Evangelical Christian engagement in elections from the Moral Majority to today." In this series, we will look at issues pertaining to election integrity and new ways of getting out the vote, including churches participating in ballot collection. We'll also look at issues Evangelicals say matter most to them ahead of the presidential election and the political engagement of diverse groups, politically and ethnically. Read other articles in the series by clicking here.

What happens when "one nation under God" becomes "one God over a nation"?

That's essentially the question at the heart of the controversy surrounding Christian nationalism — what it is, what it isn't, and who, exactly, stands to benefit from such a movement. Is it everyday American Christians in the pews, or is there some other agenda at work?

Before the gunsmoke had barely cleared this summer in Butler, Pennsylvania, after the assassination attempt against former President Donald Trump, mainstream media outlets characterized the response of Trump's Christian supporters and the outpouring of prayers for the former and potentially next president of the United States as a form of Christian nationalism.

Continued below.
In some circles - christians "are not allowed" to favor one political group over another even if that one is less inclined to what the Bible calls "abominations" in Lev 18, than the other political party.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Hazelelponi

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 25, 2018
11,975
11,361
USA
✟1,088,701.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Evangelicals wrestle with language, political agendas, potential 'fusion of Christianity and the state'

Editors' note: This is part 17 of The Christian Post's year-long articles series "Politics in the Pews: Evangelical Christian engagement in elections from the Moral Majority to today." In this series, we will look at issues pertaining to election integrity and new ways of getting out the vote, including churches participating in ballot collection. We'll also look at issues Evangelicals say matter most to them ahead of the presidential election and the political engagement of diverse groups, politically and ethnically. Read other articles in the series by clicking here.

What happens when "one nation under God" becomes "one God over a nation"?

That's essentially the question at the heart of the controversy surrounding Christian nationalism — what it is, what it isn't, and who, exactly, stands to benefit from such a movement. Is it everyday American Christians in the pews, or is there some other agenda at work?

Before the gunsmoke had barely cleared this summer in Butler, Pennsylvania, after the assassination attempt against former President Donald Trump, mainstream media outlets characterized the response of Trump's Christian supporters and the outpouring of prayers for the former and potentially next president of the United States as a form of Christian nationalism.

Continued below.

Saying it's dangerous for Christians to practice their faith in the fullness thereof, whether at the polls or at the grocery stores and is some kind of a danger to regular people is very insulting really.

This country is built on religious freedom but when Christians actually practice faith and dare touch any of the lefts sacred cows suddenly "dangerous" comes out.

These people need to find a moral compass for their own and leave others to practice their life according to their faith - to include voting their morals at the voting booth if they feel so inclined.

The only time diversity is bad is when it's Christians unless we sit well away from their civilization and don't ever vote or pray for our leaders.

If we don't sit like good second class citizens we are dangerous. Wake up and use the sight given by God.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: Michie
Upvote 0