Taylor Swift Endorses Kamala Harris For President, References 'Childless Cat Ladies'

[FreeinChrist]

Taylor Swift Endorses Kamala Harris For President, References 'Childless Cat Ladies'

"I believe we can accomplish so much more in this country if we are led by calm and not chaos," the singer wrote in an Instagram post featuring her with one of her cats.

www.huffpost.com

Pop music sensation Taylor Swift, widely considered one of the world’s most influential celebrities, endorsed Kamala Harris for president after Tuesday night’s debate.​

​

“I will be casting my vote for Kamala Harris and Tim Walz in the 2024 Presidential Election,” Swift said in an Instagram post featuring her with one of her cats. She signed her lengthy post as “Childless Cat Lady” ― a biting reference to GOP vice presidential nominee JD Vance’s now widely mocked remarks disparaging Democratic women who don’t have children.​

​

Swift, once known for her aversion to speaking out about politics, praised Harris as someone who “fights for the rights and causes I believe need a warrior to champion them.”​

“I think she is a steady-handed, gifted leader and I believe we can accomplish so much more in this country if we are led by calm and not chaos,” her post continued.​

​

​

She has 275 million followers on Instagram.

 

[RileyG]

Good for her.

 

[loveofourlord]

And now watch the right complain about her being poltiical,compared to.
ted nudgent
hulk hogan

and others I an't remember.

 

[bèlla]

That's a message for the Swifties. There's a lot of anti-patriarchy rhetoric at her events. Trump's tax policy is more favorable for the wealthy and she'll probably vote for him. But she's a puppet for the democrats and republicans have them too. They're best ignored.

~bella

 

[durangodawood]

....Trump's tax policy is more favorable for the wealthy and she'll probably vote for him.....

~bella

Loads of wealthy people are donating to the D campaign.

Presumably they arent giving money and support just to turn around and cast their own sole vote the other way. Even rich people have other things on their mind besides money sometimes.

 

[Chesterton]

Loads of wealthy people are donating to the D campaign.

Wait a minute. Hold up. Wait a minute. Are you actually trying to tell me that the party supported by the Soros' and Zuckerbergs of the world gets money from wealthy people?

Even rich people have other things on their mind besides money sometimes.

You haven't spent enough time around rich people.

 

[durangodawood]

.....You haven't spent enough time around rich people.

Just look at Elon Musk and his free speech crusade devaluing of twitter.

 

[Chesterton]

Just look at Elon Musk and his free speech crusade devaluing of twitter.

Yeah, darn those fascists with their free speech and fair play and stuff.

 

[durangodawood]

Yeah, darn those fascists with their free speech and fair play and stuff.

The point is rich people sometimes have other interests at heart besides money outcome.

 

[Chesterton]

The point is rich people sometimes have other interests at heart besides money outcome.

 

[FreeinChrist]

That's a message for the Swifties. There's a lot of anti-patriarchy rhetoric at her events. Trump's tax policy is more favorable for the wealthy and she'll probably vote for him. But she's a puppet for the democrats and republicans have them too. They're best ignored.

~bella

She is no puppet.
Do some research and see how much she donates to charities in every town she does a concert in.

 

[FreeinChrist]

Wait a minute. Hold up. Wait a minute. Are you actually trying to tell me that the party supported by the Soros' and Zuckerbergs of the world gets money from wealthy people?

You haven't spent enough time around rich people.

You post as if the Republicans aren't getting money from Adelson, Elon Musk, and other wealthy folks:
Check it out:

https://www.opensecrets.org/elections-overview/biggest-donors?cycle=2024https://www.opensecrets.org/elections-overview/biggest-donors?cycle=2024

The topic is Taylor Swift.

 

[bèlla]

Loads of wealthy people are donating to the D campaign.

Presumably they arent giving money and support just to turn around and cast their own sole vote the other way. Even rich people have other things on their mind besides money sometimes.

It's a write off. Nothing more or less.

 

[durangodawood]

It's a write off. Nothing more or less.

Typically investors prefer positive returns.

 

[RoBo1988]

In other news, scientists discover that water is wet...

 

[bèlla]

You haven't spent enough time around rich people.

Older generations understood something modern ones don't. They're seduced by proximity and the notion of sameness. Donating to a charity in an area you're performing generates positive PR which results in more streams, ticket sales, and merchandise purchases (yours and those you represent).

Biden sat down with Cardi B. Do you honestly think he's listening to her music? Celebrities push the narrative but it's difficult for some to accept the depth of their unimportance and how they've used the things they like against them.

I watch the debate for one reason alone. To see what they'd say. I didn't expect you'd get anything substantial. That isn't the plan. All I needed to confirm was the fat lady's presence.

Typically investors prefer positive returns.

If you understand how musicians earn a living (under contract) and how ticket prices work my comment is understandable. The price isn't fixed and there was a lot of press about that during her tour. At any rate I explained it above.

Creatively speaking, she doesn't have a lot of wiggle room. They own her name and catalog. She can't distribute her music. But if I design a dress that's my intellectual property. I'm not under contract and can hire someone to make it and sell it online. I set the price and bypass the retailer. I can do on demand production so I'm not stuck with overstock and only make enough to heighten demand.

The difference between the two of us is financial but not in the manner you might expect. How you enter determines the rest. You can be dirt poor and become an entertainer but ownership is restricted. Think about the NBA and you'll get it. They all have shoe deals but no one owns a company.

But when you fund it yourself you play by different rules. Because you're not in the system. That's why incubators exist. It's a foot in the door. If you keep them out you'll fare better in the long run. Knowing how is part of the challenge. As long they're feeding you you're under their thumb.

~bella

 

[Chesterton]

You post as if the Republicans aren't getting money from Adelson, Elon Musk, and other wealthy folks:
Check it out:

https://www.opensecrets.org/elections-overview/biggest-donors?cycle=2024https://www.opensecrets.org/elections-overview/biggest-donors?cycle=2024

No, I just thought it was funny that the other poster would note that rich people donate to Dems, as if he still believes the old fallacy that Reps are the party of the rich, and Dems are the party of the working man.

The topic is Taylor Swift.

I think it was disingenuous for her to call herself a childless cat lady. While she might technically fit that description (I don't know), everyone knows she is not what it means.

 

[FreeinChrist]

After Taylor Swifts endorsement, traffic to Vote.org to register to vote surged..

Who are the Biggest Donors?

Who are the biggest donors in the 2024 election cycle? See the details.

www.opensecrets.org

As of 11 a.m Wednesday, 306,422 visits to vote.gov were referred from the pop icon's endorsement post on Instagram just after last night's debate, NPR's Elena Moore reported.​

 

[Servus]

I thought it was supposed to be the republicans who were into celebrity endorsements.

 

[durangodawood]

....I think it was disingenuous for her to call herself a childless cat lady. While she might technically fit that description (I don't know), everyone knows she is not what it means.

It was a dig at JD Vance, not an earnest self description. Everyone knows thats what she means by it.