- Apr 5, 2007
- 144,404
- 27,057
- 57
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Reformed
- Marital Status
- Married
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Seems like a legit reason to me.
You have to do what you think is right. If I was voting I'd be voting for Harris because she has values that I support.Seems like a legit reason to me.
Do you realise just expressing that opinion might get you jailed in the UK these days?Seems like a legit reason to me.
Saying something that could be considered racist is not illegal. Discriminating against someone because of their race is.Do you realise just expressing that opinion might get you jailed in the UK these days?
I’m a white man.Why?
But he’s a white man.Trump was born into wealth. He reminds me of a petulant spoiled child that has to get his way.
But she’s not a white man.You have to do what you think is right. If I was voting I'd be voting for Harris because she has values that I support.
And I didn’t say anything racist.Saying something that could be considered racist is not illegal. Discriminating against someone because of their race is.
I agree, you didn't say anything racist, but you did express negative prejudice against non-white women in post #12.And I didn’t say anything racist.
No I didn’t. It’s a fact that Harris is not a white man.I agree, you didn't say anything racist, but you did express negative prejudice against non-white women in post #12.
Bradskii said:No I didn’t. It’s a fact that Harris is not a white man.
Your response to @Bradskii indicates the reason you would not vote for Harris is because she's not a white man. Therefore, you are on the record expressing a negative prejudice against non-white women.But she’s not a white man.
Wrong, there is a select group of discriminating actions that are protected housing, employment. Etc, not all as you suggestDiscriminating against someone because of their race is.
No, I’m expressing support for the white man. You are the one mentioning that she’s non-white.Bradskii said:
You have to do what you think is right. If I was voting I'd be voting for Harris because she has values that I support.
Your response to @Bradskii indicates the reason you would not vote for Harris is because she's not a white man. Therefore, you are on the record expressing a negative prejudice against non-white women.
I realize the op is intended to be flippant, but that's what can happen when you're being facetious and someone takes you seriously.
You make it sound as if it’s wrong to vote for someone based on sex and skin color.There’s a lot of better reasons to express your preference. The people who say we need a woman president make no sense because there’s many other things to focus on and there are many women who would be better candidates than Kamala or Hillary. You are just copying the bad ideas on the other side in a different way.
If Tulsi Gabbard were running against George W Bush or Dick Cheney, I think I’d vote for her.
Many white people are cruel, selfish, egotistical, inconsiderate, devious, lying, power hungry and greedy, the Bill Gates, Fauci types of the world. These white people are behind the wars and chaos as well. Many others are very delusional. Just saying, avoid this thinking and avoid thinking that white people are all bad like some are trying to say.