• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Harris’ plan to stop price gouging could create more problems than it solves

eleos1954

God is Love
Site Supporter
Nov 14, 2017
11,079
6,471
Utah
✟862,317.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others

Food prices have surged by more than 20% under the Biden-Harris administration, leaving many voters eager to stretch their dollars further at the grocery store.

On Friday, Vice President Kamala Harris said she has a solution: a federal ban on price gouging across the food industry.

“My plan will include new penalties for opportunistic companies that exploit crises and break the rules,” Harris said at a campaign event.

There’s just one issue: Harris’ proposal could create more problems than the one it’s trying to solve, some economists say
.
Why pick on the grocery stores ... they are not price gouging ... it's inflation and we know this because everything has gone up.
 
Upvote 0

SavedByGrace3

Jesus is Lord of ALL! (Not asking permission)
Site Supporter
Jun 6, 2002
20,723
4,459
Midlands
Visit site
✟773,535.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

Food prices have surged by more than 20% under the Biden-Harris administration, leaving many voters eager to stretch their dollars further at the grocery store.

On Friday, Vice President Kamala Harris said she has a solution: a federal ban on price gouging across the food industry.

“My plan will include new penalties for opportunistic companies that exploit crises and break the rules,” Harris said at a campaign event.

There’s just one issue: Harris’ proposal could create more problems than the one it’s trying to solve, some economists say
.
Great! What are you waiting for? You are in office with the president's ear. Bring this up now in the daily meetings. Get a consensus in Congress and the Senate. I am sure many would back your idea, or at least threaten the food industry to regulate themselves - or else!
So,PLEASE, go for it!
What ARE you waiting for???
 
Upvote 0

HARK!

שמע
Christian Forums Staff
Supervisor
Site Supporter
Oct 29, 2017
65,317
10,778
US
✟1,582,201.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Private
Why pick on the grocery stores ... they are not price gouging ... it's inflation and we know this because everything has gone up.
It's a math thing. The truth doesn't win elections.

 
Upvote 0

BCP1928

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2024
9,093
4,614
82
Goldsboro NC
✟269,504.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Both right wing and left wing governments have nationalized corporations, but I don't think the label applies to ours at all.
No, the assertion is that the Federal government owns controlling shares in all our major corporations. Strictly speaking that would be socialism, but not necessarily authoritarianism. Fascist governments are authoritarian, but the oligarchs still own the capital.
 
Upvote 0

HARK!

שמע
Christian Forums Staff
Supervisor
Site Supporter
Oct 29, 2017
65,317
10,778
US
✟1,582,201.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Private
No, the assertion is that the Federal government owns controlling shares in all our major corporations. Strictly speaking that would be socialism, but not necessarily authoritarianism. Fascist governments are authoritarian, but the oligarchs still own the capital.
It certainly isn't free market Capitalism when a government prints up the fiat currency to buy up the controlling shares of a nations businesses.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Laodicean60
Upvote 0

BCP1928

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2024
9,093
4,614
82
Goldsboro NC
✟269,504.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
It certainly isn't free market Capitalism when a government prints up the fiat currency to buy up the controlling shares of a nations businesses.
About that, controlling shares in all the nation's businesses is a lot of power. Why aren't they using it?
 
Upvote 0

BCP1928

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2024
9,093
4,614
82
Goldsboro NC
✟269,504.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Why would you assume that they aren't?
Well, since they could contribute to solving the nation's economic problems with that power, I must assume you have something more nefarious in mind. Like who gets to use what bathroom, maybe?
 
Upvote 0

RoBo1988

Well-Known Member
Sep 3, 2021
1,377
968
64
Dayton OH
✟146,250.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Why pick on the grocery stores ... they are not price gouging ... it's inflation and we know this because everything has gone up.
It has to be a war on something BIG!!!
BIG oil
BIG pharma (now they play nice with the government)
BIG tobacco
And now BIG Food

One they will never be at war with...
BIG Government
 
Upvote 0

mark46

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 29, 2010
20,720
5,053
✟1,022,383.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
I read the whole op-ed article and underneath i saw a video by Robert Reich on the same subject.
He talked about monopolies. 4 companies control 70% of the food market, making it easier for them to control prices.
I have seen graphs and stats elsewhere showing the record profits these companies realized when supply chain issues eased and prices were kept high.
We need competition, and we need to exert pressure on these monopolies by heavily publicizing their anti-consumer policies.
BTW, Reich's credit are way more extensive than an economist from "Weber University."
1) Price fixing or price cap don't work. By nature, they are inflationary. As a great economist once said, "I can forgive Nixon Watergare, bit no price controls".

2) Yes, four companies control 70% of the food market. So? You believe that this stifles competition? Perhaps, perhaps not. There are anti-trust laws to protect against a lack of competition.

That isn't what Harris wants to do. She wants to identify the areas of inflation where folks are concerns and try to punish those companies in those areas that are most successful. There are problems in the grocery industry. It certainly is NOT what Kroger choose to charge. Kroger charges what folks will pay, making more profits on some items and making less or none on others.

If Dems want an excess profit tax for those she defines as those in the food industry, OK. But this is a failed approach to regulation. WE NEED SENSIBLE REGULATION, but this isn't it.

If we want to break up the agricultural monopolies, OK. This might work. You might consider the role of agriculturl subsidies (and ethanol subsidies).

3) You say that the issue is more competition. If that is true, you need to allow companies to compete. Some items will have huge profits. Some companies will make huge profits. Other products will go down in price and be unprofitable. Let folks CHOOSE. If some one or two or three companies are conspiring to fix the price of eggs, prosecute them. If produce prices are too high, do SOMETHING to get more workers. Find ways to have more groceries stores in the central cities. That would have a huge effect on overall food prices.
=======
BOTTOM LINE
More sensible regulation is fine, as long as it promotes competition.
And Harris must tell us why some of this isn't being done under the current administration.
 
Upvote 0

BPPLEE

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
16,373
7,682
61
Montgomery
✟262,033.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I read the whole op-ed article and underneath i saw a video by Robert Reich on the same subject.
He talked about monopolies. 4 companies control 70% of the food market, making it easier for them to control prices.
I have seen graphs and stats elsewhere showing the record profits these companies realized when supply chain issues eased and prices were kept high.
We need competition, and we need to exert pressure on these monopolies by heavily publicizing their anti-consumer policies.
BTW, Reich's credit are way more extensive than an economist from "Weber University."
Reich is a left wing hack, I’d take anything he said with that in mind.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RoBo1988
Upvote 0

iluvatar5150

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 3, 2012
30,045
29,810
Baltimore
✟804,936.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
1) Price fixing or price cap don't work. By nature, they are inflationary.
Price caps are not inflationary. They’re problematic in other ways, sure, but not that way.


That isn't what Harris wants to do. She wants to identify the areas of inflation where folks are concerns and try to punish those companies in those areas that are most successful.
AFAIK, Harris hasn’t yet said what she wants to do, exactly.
 
Upvote 0

BPPLEE

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
16,373
7,682
61
Montgomery
✟262,033.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Price caps are not inflationary. They’re problematic in other ways, sure, but not that way.



AFAIK, Harris hasn’t yet said what she wants to do, exactly.
Price caps cause prices to be raised on other items, to make up for the loss.
 
Upvote 0

mark46

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 29, 2010
20,720
5,053
✟1,022,383.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Price caps are not inflationary. They’re problematic in other ways, sure, but not that way.



AFAIK, Harris hasn’t yet said what she wants to do, exactly.
fair enough

Are you saying that we should ignore what she is saying other than that these are the usual empty campaign promises trying to fix a problem important to voters?
 
Upvote 0

mark46

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 29, 2010
20,720
5,053
✟1,022,383.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Reich is a left wing hack, I’d take anything he said with that in mind.
Reich is what he is, an expert with lots of policy experience, and an economist who presents the view of the left wing of the Democratic Party.

Calling Reich a hack is meaningless and probably redundant for you, since you would likely all left-wing policy spokesmen as hacks.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Fantine
Upvote 0

mark46

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 29, 2010
20,720
5,053
✟1,022,383.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Price caps cause prices to be raised on other items, to make up for the loss.
Please review the effect of Nixon's price caps. Price caps are highly inflationary.
 
Upvote 0