- Apr 5, 2007
- 144,404
- 27,057
- 57
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Reformed
- Marital Status
- Married
But apparently he’s a moderate. This is disgusting. Yet the left will just fawn over him because they have to.
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Gosh. I guess all the religious people who freak out over anything they deem deviant will not be voting for him. Shocker.
But apparently he’s a moderate. This is disgusting. Yet the left will just fawn over him because they have to.
Why does an actual mutilation have to take place first?Well, let me know when Minnesota performs any gender reassignment surgeries on minors. Then I might complain about it, depending on the situation.
Yes, we are all screaming in the streets.Gosh. I guess all the religious people who freak out over anything they deem deviant will not be voting for him. Shocker.
I may be misreading Yttrium's point, but Walz is the governor of the state government, not a dictator responsible for every activity that goes on in the state.Why does an actual mutilation have to take place first?
I don’t see how I misread it. He didn’t seem to want to be concerned until mutilation took place. But if you are for legal child abuse, then…well, never mind.I may be misreading Yttrium's point, but Walz is the governor of the state government, not a dictator responsible for every activity that goes on in the state.
This seems to be a small government solution: staying out of people's healthcare business as they consult with their private physicians.
I am quite positive the medical ethics community is not supporting "legal child abuse". And neither am I.He didn’t seem to want to be concerned until mutilation took place. But if you are for legal child abuse, then…well, never mind.
Whatever that means.Indeed. Anita Bryant would be proud.
Yep. Legal child abuse.For those who are interested,
Here's the law:
and here's the section that defines "gender-affirming health care":
I am happy to explain my meaning. Which part would you like clarification on?Whatever that means.
That's not really what I meant, but yours is good too.I may be misreading Yttrium's point, but Walz is the governor of the state government, not a dictator responsible for every activity that goes on in the state.
This seems to be a small government solution: staying out of people's healthcare business as they consult with their private physicians.
If they can show me that Minnesota actually has plans to do gender reassignment surgery on little kids, then I'll take the situation seriously.
Uh huh. Gender affirming care can include any of those things. The doctors recommend what they conclude is the most appropriate treatment for the situation. Gender reassignment surgery is very rarely if ever going to be appropriate for little kids.From the link above:
b) "Gender-affirming health care" means medically necessary health care or mental health care that respects the gender identity of the patient, as experienced and defined by the patient, and that may include but is not limited to:(1) interventions to suppress the development of endogenous secondary sex characteristics;(2) interventions to align the patient's appearance or physical body with the patient's gender identity;(3) interventions to alleviate the patient's symptoms of clinically significant distress resulting from gender dysphoria as defined in the current version of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; and(4) developmentally appropriate exploration and integration of the patient's gender identity, reduction of the patient's distress, adaptive coping, and strategies to increase family acceptance of the patient's gender identity.
Eww, that is gross. We need to go back 20 or 30 years ago, where none of this woke stuff happened. Time to vote 3rd party guys.
But apparently he’s a moderate. This is disgusting. Yet the left will just fawn over him because they have to.