• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Vigano officially charged with schism and more...

fide

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2012
1,700
924
✟191,161.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
ANNOUNCEMENT

of H.E. Msgr. Carlo Maria Viganò, Archbishop

The Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith has informed me, with a simple email, of the initiation of an extrajudicial penal trial against me, with the accusation of having committed the crime of schism and charging me of having denied the legitimacy of “Pope Francis” of having broken communion “with Him” and of having rejected the Second Vatican Council. I have been summoned to the Palace of the Holy Office on June 20, in person or represented by a canon lawyer. I assume that the sentence has already been prepared, given that it is an extrajudicial process.

I regard the accusations against me as an honor. I believe that the very wording of the charges confirms the theses that I have repeatedly defended in my various addresses. It is no coincidence that the accusation against me concerns the questioning of the legitimacy of Jorge Mario Bergoglio and the rejection of Vatican II: the Council represents the ideological, theological, moral, and liturgical cancer of which the Bergoglian “synodal church” is the necessary metastasis.

It is necessary for the Episcopate, the Clergy and the People of God to seriously ask themselves whether it is consistent with the profession of the Catholic Faith to passively witness the systematic destruction of the Church by its leaders, just as other subversives are destroying civil society. Globalism calls for ethnic substitution: Bergoglio promotes uncontrolled immigration and calls for the integration of cultures and religions. Globalism supports LGBTQ+ ideology: Bergoglio authorizes the blessing of same-sex couples and imposes on the faithful the acceptance of homosexualism, while covering up the scandals of his protégés and promoting them to the highest positions of responsibility. Globalism imposes the green agenda: Bergoglio worships the idol of the Pachamama, writes delirious encyclicals about the environment, supports the Agenda 2030, and attacks those who question the theory of man-made global warming. He goes beyond his role in matters that strictly pertain to science, but always and only in one direction: a direction that is diametrically opposed to what the Church has always taught. He has mandated the use of experimental gene serums, which caused very serious damage, death and sterility, calling them “an act of love,” in exchange for funding from pharmaceutical companies and philanthropic foundations. His total alignment with the Davos religion is scandalous. Wherever governments at the service of the World Economic Forum have introduced or extended abortion, promoted vice, legitimized homosexual unions or gender transition, encouraged euthanasia, and tolerated the persecution of Catholics, not a word has been spent in defense of the Faith or Morals that are threatened, or in support of the civil battles of so many Catholics who have been abandoned by the Vatican and the Bishops. Not a word for the persecuted Catholics in China, with the complicity of the Holy See, which considers Beijing’s billions more important than the lives and freedom of thousands of Chinese who are faithful to the Roman Church. In the “synodal church” presided over by Bergoglio, no schism is recognized among the German Episcopate, or among the government-appointed Bishops who have been consecrated in China without the mandate of Rome. Because their action is consistent with the destruction of the Church, and therefore must be concealed, minimized, tolerated, and finally encouraged. In these eleven years of “pontificate” the Catholic Church has been humiliated and discredited above all because of the scandals and corruption of the leaders of the Hierarchy, which have been totally ignored even as the most ruthless Vatican authoritarianism raged against faithful priests and religious, small communities of traditional nuns, and communities tied to the Latin Mass.

This one-sided zeal is reminiscent of Cromwell’s fanaticism, typical of those who defy Providence in the presumption of knowing that they are finally at the top of the hierarchical pyramid, free to do and undo as they please without anyone objecting to anything. And this work of destruction, this willingness to renounce the salvation of souls in the name of a human peace that denies God is not an invention of Bergoglio, but the main (and unmentionable) purpose of those who used a Council to contradict the Catholic Magisterium and to begin to demolish the Church from within, in small steps, but always in a single direction, always with the indulgent tolerance or culpable inaction – if not the explicit approval – of the Roman authorities. The Catholic Church has been slowly but surely taken over, and Bergoglio has been given the task of making it a philanthropic agency, the “church of humanity, of inclusion, of the environment” at the service of the New World Order. But this is not the Catholic Church: it is her counterfeit.

The resignation of Benedict XVI and the appointment by the St. Gallen Mafia of a successor in line with the diktats of the Agenda 2030 was intended to allow – and has succeeded in allowing – the global coup to take place with the complicity and authoritative support of the Church of Rome. Bergoglio is to the Church what other world leaders are to their nations: traitors, subversives, and final liquidators of traditional society who are certain of impunity. Bergoglio’s defect of consent (vitium consensus) in accepting his election is based precisely on the evident alienity of his action of government and magisterium with respect to what any Catholic of any age expects from the Vicar of Christ and the Successor of the Prince of the Apostles. Everything that Bergoglio does constitutes an offense and a provocation to the entire Catholic Church, to her Saints of all times, to the Martyrs who were killed in odium Fidei, and to the Popes of all times until the Second Vatican Council.

This is also and principally an offense against the Divine Head of the Church, Our Lord Jesus Christ, Whose sacred authority Bergoglio claims to exercise for the detriment of the Mystical Body, with an action that is too systematic and coherent to appear to be the fruit of mere incapacity. In the work of Bergoglio and his circle, the Lord’s warning is put into practice: Beware of false prophets, who come to you in the guise of lambs, but who are ravenous wolves at heart (Mt 7:15). I am honored not to have – and indeed I do not want – any ecclesial communion with them: theirs is a lobby, which conceals its complicity with the masters of the world in order to deceive many souls and prevent any resistance against the establishment of the Kingdom of the Antichrist.

In the face of the Dicastery’s accusations, I claim, as Successor of the Apostles, to be in full communion with the Roman Catholic Apostolic Church, with the Magisterium of the Roman Pontiffs, and with the uninterrupted doctrinal, moral, and liturgical Tradition which they have faithfully preserved.

I repudiate the neomodernist errors inherent in the Second Vatican Council and in the so-called “post-conciliar magisterium,” in particular in matters of collegiality, ecumenism, religious freedom, the secularity of the State, and the liturgy.

I repudiate, reject, and condemn the scandals, errors, and heresies of Jorge Mario Bergoglio, who manifests an absolutely tyrannical management of power, exercised against the purpose that legitimizes Authority in the Church: an authority that is vicarious of that of Christ, and as such must obey Him alone. This separation of the Papacy from its legitimizing principle, which is Christ the High Priest, transforms the ministerium into a self-referential tyranny.

No Catholic worthy of the name can be in communion with this “Bergoglian church,” because it acts in clear discontinuity and rupture with all the Popes of history and with the Church of Christ.

Fifty years ago, in that same Palace of the Holy Office, Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre was summoned and accused of schism for rejecting Vatican II. His defense is mine; his words are mine; and his arguments are mine – arguments before which the Roman authorities could not condemn him for heresy, having to wait instead for him to consecrate bishops so as to have the pretext of declaring him schismatic and then revoking his excommunication when he was already dead. The scheme is repeated even after half a century has demonstrated Archbishop Lefebvre’s prophetic choice.

In these times of apostasy, Catholics will find in Pastors faithful to the mandate received from Our Lord an example and an encouragement to abide in the Truth of Christ.

Depositum custodi, according to the Apostle’s exhortation: as the time approaches when I will have to give an account to the Son of God of all my actions, I intend to persevere in the bonum certamen and not to fail in the witness of faith which is required of each one who, as Bishop, has been endowed with the fullness of the priesthood and constituted Successor of the Apostles.

I invite all Catholics to pray that the Lord will come to the aid of His Church and give courage to those who are persecuted for their Faith.

+ Carlo Maria Viganò, Archbishop

20 June 2024

Silverii Papæ et Martyris

Dermitii O’Hurley, Episcopi et Martyris
 

mourningdove~

Romans 10:17
Site Supporter
Dec 24, 2005
10,913
4,217
✟714,528.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Widowed
ANNOUNCEMENT

of H.E. Msgr. Carlo Maria Viganò, Archbishop

The Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith has informed me, with a simple email, of the initiation of an extrajudicial penal trial against me, with the accusation of having committed the crime of schism and charging me of having denied the legitimacy of “Pope Francis” of having broken communion “with Him” and of having rejected the Second Vatican Council. I have been summoned to the Palace of the Holy Office on June 20, in person or represented by a canon lawyer. I assume that the sentence has already been prepared, given that it is an extrajudicial process.

I regard the accusations against me as an honor. I believe that the very wording of the charges confirms the theses that I have repeatedly defended in my various addresses. It is no coincidence that the accusation against me concerns the questioning of the legitimacy of Jorge Mario Bergoglio and the rejection of Vatican II: the Council represents the ideological, theological, moral, and liturgical cancer of which the Bergoglian “synodal church” is the necessary metastasis.

It is necessary for the Episcopate, the Clergy and the People of God to seriously ask themselves whether it is consistent with the profession of the Catholic Faith to passively witness the systematic destruction of the Church by its leaders, just as other subversives are destroying civil society. Globalism calls for ethnic substitution: Bergoglio promotes uncontrolled immigration and calls for the integration of cultures and religions. Globalism supports LGBTQ+ ideology: Bergoglio authorizes the blessing of same-sex couples and imposes on the faithful the acceptance of homosexualism, while covering up the scandals of his protégés and promoting them to the highest positions of responsibility. Globalism imposes the green agenda: Bergoglio worships the idol of the Pachamama, writes delirious encyclicals about the environment, supports the Agenda 2030, and attacks those who question the theory of man-made global warming. He goes beyond his role in matters that strictly pertain to science, but always and only in one direction: a direction that is diametrically opposed to what the Church has always taught. He has mandated the use of experimental gene serums, which caused very serious damage, death and sterility, calling them “an act of love,” in exchange for funding from pharmaceutical companies and philanthropic foundations. His total alignment with the Davos religion is scandalous. Wherever governments at the service of the World Economic Forum have introduced or extended abortion, promoted vice, legitimized homosexual unions or gender transition, encouraged euthanasia, and tolerated the persecution of Catholics, not a word has been spent in defense of the Faith or Morals that are threatened, or in support of the civil battles of so many Catholics who have been abandoned by the Vatican and the Bishops. Not a word for the persecuted Catholics in China, with the complicity of the Holy See, which considers Beijing’s billions more important than the lives and freedom of thousands of Chinese who are faithful to the Roman Church. In the “synodal church” presided over by Bergoglio, no schism is recognized among the German Episcopate, or among the government-appointed Bishops who have been consecrated in China without the mandate of Rome. Because their action is consistent with the destruction of the Church, and therefore must be concealed, minimized, tolerated, and finally encouraged. In these eleven years of “pontificate” the Catholic Church has been humiliated and discredited above all because of the scandals and corruption of the leaders of the Hierarchy, which have been totally ignored even as the most ruthless Vatican authoritarianism raged against faithful priests and religious, small communities of traditional nuns, and communities tied to the Latin Mass.

This one-sided zeal is reminiscent of Cromwell’s fanaticism, typical of those who defy Providence in the presumption of knowing that they are finally at the top of the hierarchical pyramid, free to do and undo as they please without anyone objecting to anything. And this work of destruction, this willingness to renounce the salvation of souls in the name of a human peace that denies God is not an invention of Bergoglio, but the main (and unmentionable) purpose of those who used a Council to contradict the Catholic Magisterium and to begin to demolish the Church from within, in small steps, but always in a single direction, always with the indulgent tolerance or culpable inaction – if not the explicit approval – of the Roman authorities. The Catholic Church has been slowly but surely taken over, and Bergoglio has been given the task of making it a philanthropic agency, the “church of humanity, of inclusion, of the environment” at the service of the New World Order. But this is not the Catholic Church: it is her counterfeit.

The resignation of Benedict XVI and the appointment by the St. Gallen Mafia of a successor in line with the diktats of the Agenda 2030 was intended to allow – and has succeeded in allowing – the global coup to take place with the complicity and authoritative support of the Church of Rome. Bergoglio is to the Church what other world leaders are to their nations: traitors, subversives, and final liquidators of traditional society who are certain of impunity. Bergoglio’s defect of consent (vitium consensus) in accepting his election is based precisely on the evident alienity of his action of government and magisterium with respect to what any Catholic of any age expects from the Vicar of Christ and the Successor of the Prince of the Apostles. Everything that Bergoglio does constitutes an offense and a provocation to the entire Catholic Church, to her Saints of all times, to the Martyrs who were killed in odium Fidei, and to the Popes of all times until the Second Vatican Council.

This is also and principally an offense against the Divine Head of the Church, Our Lord Jesus Christ, Whose sacred authority Bergoglio claims to exercise for the detriment of the Mystical Body, with an action that is too systematic and coherent to appear to be the fruit of mere incapacity. In the work of Bergoglio and his circle, the Lord’s warning is put into practice: Beware of false prophets, who come to you in the guise of lambs, but who are ravenous wolves at heart (Mt 7:15). I am honored not to have – and indeed I do not want – any ecclesial communion with them: theirs is a lobby, which conceals its complicity with the masters of the world in order to deceive many souls and prevent any resistance against the establishment of the Kingdom of the Antichrist.

In the face of the Dicastery’s accusations, I claim, as Successor of the Apostles, to be in full communion with the Roman Catholic Apostolic Church, with the Magisterium of the Roman Pontiffs, and with the uninterrupted doctrinal, moral, and liturgical Tradition which they have faithfully preserved.

I repudiate the neomodernist errors inherent in the Second Vatican Council and in the so-called “post-conciliar magisterium,” in particular in matters of collegiality, ecumenism, religious freedom, the secularity of the State, and the liturgy.

I repudiate, reject, and condemn the scandals, errors, and heresies of Jorge Mario Bergoglio, who manifests an absolutely tyrannical management of power, exercised against the purpose that legitimizes Authority in the Church: an authority that is vicarious of that of Christ, and as such must obey Him alone. This separation of the Papacy from its legitimizing principle, which is Christ the High Priest, transforms the ministerium into a self-referential tyranny.

No Catholic worthy of the name can be in communion with this “Bergoglian church,” because it acts in clear discontinuity and rupture with all the Popes of history and with the Church of Christ.

Fifty years ago, in that same Palace of the Holy Office, Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre was summoned and accused of schism for rejecting Vatican II. His defense is mine; his words are mine; and his arguments are mine – arguments before which the Roman authorities could not condemn him for heresy, having to wait instead for him to consecrate bishops so as to have the pretext of declaring him schismatic and then revoking his excommunication when he was already dead. The scheme is repeated even after half a century has demonstrated Archbishop Lefebvre’s prophetic choice.

In these times of apostasy, Catholics will find in Pastors faithful to the mandate received from Our Lord an example and an encouragement to abide in the Truth of Christ.

Depositum custodi, according to the Apostle’s exhortation: as the time approaches when I will have to give an account to the Son of God of all my actions, I intend to persevere in the bonum certamen and not to fail in the witness of faith which is required of each one who, as Bishop, has been endowed with the fullness of the priesthood and constituted Successor of the Apostles.

I invite all Catholics to pray that the Lord will come to the aid of His Church and give courage to those who are persecuted for their Faith.

+ Carlo Maria Viganò, Archbishop

20 June 2024

Silverii Papæ et Martyris

Dermitii O’Hurley, Episcopi et Martyris

Some call him a crazy old man ... 'off his rocker' ... but I understand Archbishop Vigano's concerns.
... Guess that makes me abit 'crazy', too.

We are living in very interesting times.
:praying:
 
  • Like
Reactions: SashaMaria
Upvote 0

Michie

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
184,189
67,274
Woods
✟6,051,545.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Some call him a crazy old man ... 'off his rocker' ... but I understand Archbishop Vigano's concerns.
... Guess that makes me abit 'crazy', too.

We are living in very interesting times.
:praying:
He has gone off the rails a bit but nothing compared to the likes of Martin and Co.
 
Upvote 0

mourningdove~

Romans 10:17
Site Supporter
Dec 24, 2005
10,913
4,217
✟714,528.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Widowed
He has gone off the rails a bit but nothing compared to the likes of Martin and Co.

It is so hard to believe sometimes, that all of these persons are members of the same church.

Just like the 'The Spectrum' thread in this forum, showing all the divisions within the RC, and the Protestant churches, too. There is so much fracturing that has happened, and continues to happen, within the Body of Christ ... not unlike the world we are living in. Sad. So very sad.

... But I believe God will fix it all one day.

:blacksunrays:
 
Upvote 0

chevyontheriver

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 29, 2015
22,951
19,969
Flyoverland
✟1,387,581.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-American-Solidarity
Some call him a crazy old man ... 'off his rocker' ... but I understand Archbishop Vigano's concerns.
... Guess that makes me abit 'crazy', too.

We are living in very interesting times.
:praying:
I understand his concerns. I still try to maintain communion with this pope. I don’t know how I will continue doing so but I try. I can say we have a bad pope but we still have a pope. I have not gone sedevacantist.
 
Upvote 0

Michie

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
184,189
67,274
Woods
✟6,051,545.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
From Our Sunday Visitor:

 
Upvote 0

mourningdove~

Romans 10:17
Site Supporter
Dec 24, 2005
10,913
4,217
✟714,528.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Widowed
I understand his concerns. I still try to maintain communion with this pope. I don’t know how I will continue doing so but I try. I can say we have a bad pope but we still have a pope. I have not gone sedevacantist.
Yeah, I get that. :)
And I admire your perseverance.

But all the divisiveness has made me take a long hard look at a lot of things. The divisiveness is everywhere, not just in the RC, but most everywhere throughout the Body of Christ it would seem. Very unfortunate, for, while all the divisiveness is going on, there are still some of us looking for something true and stabilizing to hold onto, from somewhere within Christianity. But it's getting harder to find it, except for in Christ. And maybe that's just how the Lord would have it to be.

In the end, the Lord will prevail.
 
Upvote 0

Michie

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
184,189
67,274
Woods
✟6,051,545.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Yeah, I get that. :)
And I admire your perseverance.

But all the divisiveness has made me take a long hard look at a lot of things. The divisiveness is everywhere, not just in the RC, but most everywhere throughout the Body of Christ it would seem. Very unfortunate, for, while all the divisiveness is going on, there are still some of us looking for something true and stabilizing to hold onto, from somewhere within Christianity. But it's getting harder to find it, except for in Christ. And maybe that's just how the Lord would have it to be.

In the end, the Lord will prevail.
I rely on Scripture and the infallible teachings of the Church.
 
Upvote 0

chevyontheriver

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 29, 2015
22,951
19,969
Flyoverland
✟1,387,581.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-American-Solidarity
Yeah, I get that. :)
And I admire your perseverance.

But all the divisiveness has made me take a long hard look at a lot of things. The divisiveness is everywhere, not just in the RC, but most everywhere throughout the Body of Christ it would seem. Very unfortunate, for, while all the divisiveness is going on, there are still some of us looking for something true and stabilizing to hold onto, from somewhere within Christianity. But it's getting harder to find it, except for in Christ. And maybe that's just how the Lord would have it to be.

In the end, the Lord will prevail.
This is where perseverence comes in. Enduring in the faith in spite of craziness. Remember back to what you knew. That's all pretty much still true even if this cardinal contradicts that cardinal and the pope says contradictory things almost every day. Because in the end the Lord does prevail. We win. If we can hang on and use the graces we have been given.
 
Upvote 0

chevyontheriver

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 29, 2015
22,951
19,969
Flyoverland
✟1,387,581.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-American-Solidarity
From Our Sunday Visitor:

These guys in Rome are quick to come out against what they don't like. The pope is supposed to have unity as the purpose of his office. All I feel is him pushing me towards the door all the time.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: SashaMaria
Upvote 0

fide

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2012
1,700
924
✟191,161.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
I understand his concerns. I still try to maintain communion with this pope. I don’t know how I will continue doing so but I try. I can say we have a bad pope but we still have a pope. I have not gone sedevacantist.
I ask this seriously, chevy, and I consider myself a faithful Catholic: would it be so bad a thing to not have a pope? If would be "not possible" or "possible but catastrophic" or whatever degree of bad - please explain if it can be explained briefly.
 
Upvote 0

chevyontheriver

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 29, 2015
22,951
19,969
Flyoverland
✟1,387,581.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-American-Solidarity
I ask this seriously, chevy, and I consider myself a faithful Catholic: would it be so bad a thing to not have a pope? If would be "not possible" or "possible but catastrophic" or whatever degree of bad - please explain if it can be explained briefly.
Well, we have one. So such hypothesizing might be interesting but mostly academic meandering.

I could see some sort of re-imagined papacy as pope John Paul II asked us to start considering. It would be less dictatorial than this papacy. It would be quieter than most of the recent papacies as well. And on and on.

But we have a papacy, and we have this pope. Stuck with him for now.

The Orthodox aren't necessarily thriving without a pope. The Protestants are no beacon of truth and unity without a pope. And we aren't necessarily thriving either with this pope.
 
Upvote 0

Michie

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
184,189
67,274
Woods
✟6,051,545.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
These guys in Rome are quick to come out against what they don't like. The pope is supposed to have unity as the purpose of his office. All I feel is him pushing me towards the door all the time.
Puzzling isn’t it? Yet we have many clergy that go against the Church and her teachings and he seems quite cozy with those types.
 
Upvote 0

chevyontheriver

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 29, 2015
22,951
19,969
Flyoverland
✟1,387,581.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-American-Solidarity
Puzzling isn’t it? Yet we have many clergy that go against the Church and her teachings and he seems quite cozy with those types.
Yes. It really does seem like some combination of who has the mud on whom and who goes to all the right parties with whom. The disobedience of priests since 1965 has been staggering, and only rarely in that time period was any priest ever stepped on. In the last ten years cancelled priests and now cancelled bishops have become a thing. Annoy this pope and you too can be cancelled. But it's only the more traditional priests and bishops it seems who they want to cancel.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Michie
Upvote 0

fide

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2012
1,700
924
✟191,161.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Well, we have one. So such hypothesizing might be interesting but mostly academic meandering.

I could see some sort of re-imagined papacy as pope John Paul II asked us to start considering. It would be less dictatorial than this papacy. It would be quieter than most of the recent papacies as well. And on and on.

But we have a papacy, and we have this pope. Stuck with him for now.

The Orthodox aren't necessarily thriving without a pope. The Protestants are no beacon of truth and unity without a pope. And we aren't necessarily thriving either with this pope.
You didn't answer my question, but that is your call.
 
Upvote 0

Michie

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
184,189
67,274
Woods
✟6,051,545.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Upvote 0

chevyontheriver

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 29, 2015
22,951
19,969
Flyoverland
✟1,387,581.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-American-Solidarity
You didn't answer my question, but that is your call.
Well, we have a pope so it would involve getting rid of a pope. That hasn’t been all positive for the Orthodox and it hasn’t been all that positive for the Protestants.

Right now I would be happy with a pope who didn’t do Pachamama and wasn’t eager to bless the unblessable. I’m not ready to plan out the removal of the papacy all together. I don’t think that was John Paul’s idea either.
 
Upvote 0