Johnson on Biden’s Mental Decline: ‘I Will Submit to a Polygraph’ if Anyone Doubts My Interactions

[Hans Blaster]

We have come full circle. Rightists first went on the "Biden is old and senile" attack, then switched to an attack on his family while calling them a 'crime family', and when their years of wasted taxpayer money on a witch hunt failed miserably, here we are again going after his age.

pitiful is a great word to describe the actions against the President.

This is all just a nefarious plot by the right to lower expectations of Biden going into the debate with Trump, just like they did with the last couple State of the Union speeches. Those worked out fine for them...

 

[BPPLEE]

...sure, he can talk.
Talk coherently? Not so much.
Witness what happened in Vegas when his teleprompter malfunctioned. He apparently fears being eaten by a shark.

I liked his story. Get eaten by a shark or get electrocuted, which would you choose?

 

[wing2000]

I liked his story. Get eaten by a shark or get electrocuted, which would you choose?

What was his point?

 

[Always in His Presence]

This is all just a nefarious plot by the right to lower expectations of Biden going into the debate with Trump, just like they did with the last couple State of the Union speeches. Those worked out fine for them...

Ah.... the vast right wing conspiracy theory has once again raised it's head.

I don't think you can lower expectations on a person who hold the lowest approval rating in history.

 

[Always in His Presence]

He’s aware of the parachutist packing his kit and attempts to speak with the young man…but no let’s focus on the “abuse” angle.
You’re correct, it’s “pitiful”, but not in the way you mean.

Watch the video - doe not say anything to the parachutist (who is Italian), but gets distracted once again and has to be pulled back by the Italian official.

At least it wasn't the Easter Bunny this time.

 

[BPPLEE]

What was his point?

To entertain the crowd

 

[JustOneWay]

So vote for Biden, the proven racist, narcissist and liar instead?

The projection posted here is amazing.

 

[childeye 2]

Johnson on Biden’s Mental Decline: ‘I Will Submit to a Polygraph’ if Anyone Doubts My Interactions

After Joe Biden's "perpetual state of confusion" at this week's D-Day commemoration, rumors about the president's diminished mental state are picking up even mo

washingtonstand.com

It’s a “big news story,” Johnson admitted. “The Wall Street Journal reporters interviewed, I think, around 50 people — Republicans and Democrats — about the president’s mental acumen,” he reiterated, “and … it was quite obvious to everyone that he’s not on his A-game. I’ll say that charitably. And they quoted an exchange that he and I had in the Oval Office, just the two of us. There were several people who talked about that.”

The speaker explained that he didn’t provide comment to the WSJ, but on Saturday’s show, he confirmed that the report was accurate. “… When we were talking about his executive order on LNG exports, and he intimated to me that he didn’t quite understand what he signed — that he didn’t know that he paused exports. And that’s had a terrible effect on the country, our security, our economy. And it’s fueling Vladimir Putin’s war machine, because Europe has to get their gas from him instead of from us. And the president tried to argue with me and tell me that he didn’t do that, when clearly he did. That was a subject of the article.”

Now, months later, people are trying to dismiss Johnson’s account. “And I’ve said if anybody disputes the account of that, I will submit to a polygraph, because I know exactly how that conversation went down, and I’m telling the truth about it. I take no pleasure in that because we’re projecting weakness on the world stage. This president is not thinking.”

Feeble Stuttering Old Man Biden knew exactly what he was talking about, and Johnson was the one that was wrong.

Johnson: "he intimated to me that he didn’t quite understand what he signed — that he didn’t know that he paused exports".
Johnson said: Biden told me, "it's only a study".

The fact: It did not pause exports and does not affect exports of LNG to Europe for two to three years. It's a pause on permits for long term exports of LNG to non-free trade agreement countries, until DOE can determine the impacts on supply and National security interests.

Reuters Feb.13
President Joe Biden's decision to pause approvals of new exports of liquefied natural gas will have no affect on U.S. supplies to Europe over the next two or three years, a European Commission official said on Tuesday after meeting U.S. officials.

 

[childeye 2]

Definition of projection:

"In psychology, projection refers to assigning your negative traits or unwanted emotions to others without being aware you’re doing it."

Projection in Psychology: Definition, Defense Mechanism, Examples

In psychology, projection refers to placing your own negative traits or unwanted emotions onto others, usually without reason.

www.healthline.com

Are you saying I'm the racist, narcissist and a liar and that I'm projecting those negative traits onto Biden?




The projection posted here is amazing. See, I can play this games too.

It means you're projecting a negative prejudice through which you slander Biden, as a defense mechanism. Since Trump is a known liar who displays a racist, narcissistic, carnal mindset, you project that you want to make Biden look the same so that you can rationalize liking Trump.

 

[KCfromNC]

Trump can talk for hours without notes.

"Look, having nuclear — my uncle was a great professor and scientist and engineer, Dr. John Trump at MIT; good genes, very good genes, OK, very smart, the Wharton School of Finance, very good, very smart — you know, if you’re a conservative Republican, if I were a liberal, if, like, OK, if I ran as a liberal Democrat, they would say I'm one of the smartest people anywhere in the world — it’s true! — but when you're a conservative Republican they try — oh, do they do a number — that’s why I always start off: Went to Wharton, was a good student, went there, went there, did this, built a fortune — you know I have to give my like credentials all the time, because we’re a little disadvantaged — but you look at the nuclear deal, the thing that really bothers me — it would have been so easy, and it’s not as important as these lives are — nuclear is so powerful; my uncle explained that to me many, many years ago, the power and that was 35 years ago; he would explain the power of what's going to happen and he was right, who would have thought? — but when you look at what's going on with the four prisoners — now it used to be three, now it’s four — but when it was three and even now, I would have said it's all in the messenger; fellas, and it is fellas because, you know, they don't, they haven’t figured that the women are smarter right now than the men, so, you know, it’s gonna take them about another 150 years — but the Persians are great negotiators, the Iranians are great negotiators, so, and they, they just killed, they just killed us, this is horrible."

Donald J. Trump

He may not be as sharp as he used to be

Donald J Trump from July 2016....

 

[JustOneWay]

It means you're projecting a negative prejudice through which you slander Biden, as a defense mechanism. Since Trump is a known liar who displays a racist, narcissistic, carnal mindset, you project that you want to make Biden look the same so that you can rationalize liking Trump.

Thanks for this. Projection does not have to be in the first person. Donald has MANY willing supporters.

 

[Vambram]

Feeble Stuttering Old Man Biden knew exactly what he was talking about, and Johnson was the one that was wrong.

Johnson: "he intimated to me that he didn’t quite understand what he signed — that he didn’t know that he paused exports".
Johnson said: Biden told me, "it's only a study".

The fact: It did not pause exports and does not affect exports of LNG to Europe for two to three years. It's a pause on permits for long term exports of LNG to non-free trade agreement countries, until DOE can determine the impacts on supply and National security interests.

Reuters Feb.13
President Joe Biden's decision to pause approvals of new exports of liquefied natural gas will have no affect on U.S. supplies to Europe over the next two or three years, a European Commission official said on Tuesday after meeting U.S. officials.

This looks like to me to be something that is called "splitting hairs".

 

[Vambram]

Doddery Biden is 'the worst he's ever been' as video shows him shuffling away

ELDERLY Joe Biden has given his “worst ever” performance at a major international summit, G7 insiders say – after he was bizarrely caught freezing again. Global powerhouse leaders…

www.thesun.co.uk

 

[MrMoe]

It means you're projecting a negative prejudice through which you slander Biden, as a defense mechanism.

There is documented proof of everything I said.

For example Biden continues to lie about Trumps "some very fine people on both sides" comment, years later.

Trump's Charlottesville comments twisted by Joe Biden and the media

Sure, Trump said there were 'fine people on both sides' but in the next breath he condemned 'neo-Nazis and White nationalists.' Don't leave that out.

www.usatoday.com

No negative prejudice required.

Since Trump is a known liar who displays a racist, narcissistic, carnal mindset,

So is Biden.

you project that you want to make Biden look the same so that you can rationalize liking Trump.

What makes you think I like Trump?

 

[MrMoe]

Thanks for this. Projection does not have to be in the first person. Donald has MANY willing supporters.

I hope you realize his comment could easily apply to Biden supporters as well.

 

[childeye 2]

There is documented proof of everything I said.

For example Biden continues to lie about Trumps "some very fine people on both sides" comment, years later.

Trump's Charlottesville comments twisted by Joe Biden and the media

Sure, Trump said there were 'fine people on both sides' but in the next breath he condemned 'neo-Nazis and White nationalists.' Don't leave that out.

www.usatoday.com

No negative prejudice required.

Biden said Trump assigned a moral equivalence between both sides. How is that a Lie?

Trump drew a false equivalency by indicating both sides were to blame. Trump ended up claiming there were bad people on both sides and there were very fine people on both sides. Trump said there were neo nazis and white nationalists that should be condemned but that doesn't change the fact that he assigned a moral equivalency between both sides.

Here is the context: August 12, white supremacists and neo nazis are in Charlottesville to protest the removal of a confederate statue. Counter protestors show up to protest against the white supremacists and violence breaks out. A white supremacist sympathizer drives his car into a crowd of counter protestors injuring some and killing a young woman.

After that happened Trump said this: "But we're closely following the terrible events unfolding in Charlottesville, Va.. We condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry and violence on many sides, on many sides." <----This is drawing a moral equivalence.

Three days later Trump holds a press conference to clarify why he drew a moral equivalence between the counter protesters and the white supremacist driver who drove his car into a crowd of counter protesters. And again Trump draws a moral equivalence between both sides: TRUMP: I think there’s blame on both sides. If you look at both sides — I think there’s blame on both sides". <----This is drawing a moral equivalence

Look at the article you posted. Biden: “That’s when we heard the words from the President of the United States that stunned the world and shocked the conscience of this nation,” Biden intoned, that there were “some very fine people on both sides.” Biden said that Trump “assigned a moral equivalence between those spreading hate and those with the courage to stand against it,” and that in this moment Biden concluded “we are in a battle for the soul of the nation.”

Biden didn't lie.

 

[childeye 2]

No negative prejudice required.

Not when you believe propaganda.

What makes you think I like Trump?

Because you draw a false equivalency between Trump and Biden.

 

[MrMoe]

Biden said Trump assigned a moral equivalence between both sides. How is that a Lie?

Biden's own words:


“assigned a moral equivalence between those spreading hate and those with the courage to stand against it,”

Who were those spreading hate that day? The neo-nazis and white supremacist. The very ones Trump condemned. So Biden is spreading a lie.

Trump drew a false equivalency by indicating both sides were to blame.

There were people on both sides to blame. Those who instigated fights. Which was on both sides.

Trump ended up claiming there were bad people on both sides and there were very fine people on both sides.

Which is true.


There were the neo-nazis/white supremacists and the protestors instigating fights.


And there were those who peacefully protested for or against the taking down of the statue.

Trump said there were neo nazis and white nationalists that should be condemned but that doesn't change the fact that he assigned a moral equivalency between both sides.

Which sides?

Here is the context: August 12, white supremacists and neo nazis are in Charlottesville to protest the removal of a confederate statue. Counter protestors show up to protest against the white supremacists and violence breaks out. A white supremacist sympathizer drives his car into a crowd of counter protestors injuring some and killing a young woman.

After that happened Trump said this: "But we're closely following the terrible events unfolding in Charlottesville, Va.. We condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry and violence on many sides, on many sides." <----This is drawing a moral equivalence.

The protesters also displayed hatred, bigotry and violence by attacking people that were not neo-nazis/white supremacists.


As Trump said: "But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists."

Three days later Trump holds a press conference to clarify why he drew a moral equivalence between the counter protesters and the white supremacist driver who drove his car into a crowd of counter protesters.

This is an outright lie. He never made any such equivelence.

"And I'm not talking about the neo-nazis and the white nationalists. Because they should be condemned totally."

Which would include the driver, who was a neo-nazi.

And again Trump draws a moral equivalence between both sides: TRUMP: I think there’s blame on both sides. If you look at both sides — I think there’s blame on both sides". <----This is drawing a moral equivalence

Look at the article you posted. Biden: “That’s when we heard the words from the President of the United States that stunned the world and shocked the conscience of this nation,” Biden intoned, that there were “some very fine people on both sides.” Biden said that Trump “assigned a moral equivalence between those spreading hate and those with the courage to stand against it,” and that in this moment Biden concluded “we are in a battle for the soul of the nation.”

Biden didn't lie.

Biden is claiming Trump made a moral equivalence between neo-nazis and protesters when he state "very fine people on both sides" after Trump made it clear he wasn't talking about neo-nazis.

Hence Biden is spreading a lie about Trump calling neo-nazis and white supremacist very fine people.

 

[MrMoe]

Not when you believe propaganda.

You mean like the article by USA Today I posted which is a left wing site?

USA Today - Bias and Credibility

LEFT-CENTER BIAS These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording

mediabiasfactcheck.com

Because you draw a false equivalency between Trump and Biden.

How does saying they both share horrible traits show that I like Trump? I would think that shows the exact opposite.

 

[Hazelelponi]

I guess I didn't provide enough of a description.
6'2" or so. 275-300 pounds. Crude and vulgar in his speech.

Do you know the meaning of vulgar? it's characteristic of or belonging to the masses. It comes from the Latin meaning common people.

I just thought you might find it interesting, that the way Trump talks IS indeed vulgar, it's how your average worker in America talks...

For most of America, it's not offensive, it's just talking to people normally.

Every single time you insult the way Trump talks you also insult the average American citizen who does indeed vote, and you indeed prove daily you detest the average American citizen through your speech and attitudes.

People are people, they don't generally like those who can't stand them.