Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Maybe you ought to at least read the OP of the thread whose title I quoted to find out what it's about.That's a weird couple of titles. Is the second one real? Did Trump order someone's execution? I haven't read the thread because the title seems blatantly
false to the point where there's no real possibility of it being true.
I don't want to be accused of trying to derail the thread by anyone clinging to some fantasy of Trump committing crimes he hasn't been accused of....but you put it in the OP, so it seems entirely fair to ask if Trump has been charged with attempted murder?
If you think that article is false then you need to argue your case in that thread. For this thread the two thread titles were taken as examples casting doubt on the competence of both candidates.Former President Trump’s legal team suggested Tuesday that even a president directing SEAL Team Six to kill a political opponent would be an action barred from prosecution given a former executive’s broad immunity to criminal prosecution.
The hypothetical was presented to Trump attorney John Sauer who answered with a “qualified yes” that a former president would be immune from prosecution on that matter or even on selling pardons.
Just imagine it's 1932 Germany, do you think sitting out an election because there will be a better choice next one a good idea?
He was responding to a hypothetical “gotcha “ question.Maybe you ought to at least read the OP of the thread whose title I quoted to find out what it's about.
The thread title doesn't state anything about Trump being "charged with attempted murder" - such an obvious strawman.
From the article cited in the OP of that thread
If you think that article is false then you need to argue your case in that thread. For this thread the two thread titles were taken as examples casting doubt on the competence of both candidates.
I'm not alone in thinking this am I.
What is really disappointing is that your strawman post received a winner. This shows a big problem with how such marks are awarded by forum members - they are awarded not on the quality of posts but as an expression of partisanship.
Robert Hur plainly stated in his report the differences between Biden's and Trump's document problems.A special prosecutor....yes. He decided he wouldn't be able to prove Biden was mentally competent enough to know he was breaking the law.
Right...which is that weaponization of the DOJ everyone is talking about.
If you're charging someone with a crime you yourself have committed....and that someone is your political opponent...
I think we can fairly describe that person as entirely corrupt.
There is consistency. Only you seem to be ignoring some facts about the way Trump has been behaving when the authorities have asked him for the documents backDo I have to be in order to express my opinion that there should be consistency when it comes to prosecution?
There’s consistency for everyone elseThere is consistency. Only you seem to be ignoring some facts about the way Trump has been behaving when the authorities have asked him for the documents back
I hear the autopilot from Airplane might be available, though I hear he might be a bit of a blowhard.
Yeah he’s an idiot but that shouldn’t preclude him from being treated fairly.Huh? I'd say the law have been extremely accommodating and patient and have been giving Trump 2nd 3rd 4th 5th chances. But Trump keeps on defying
I think he is being treated fairly. Think about what would happen if the police try to arrest two people for stealing. One com0lies and one resists. The person resisting is likely to be manhandled. E.g raiding of maralago. Also the person who complies is likely to benefit from leiniencyYeah he’s an idiot but that shouldn’t preclude him from being treated fairly.
The one who complies is treated better by the arresting officer and the one who resists faces additional charges. The prosecutor is not the arresting officer though.I think he is being treated fairly. Think about what would happen if the police try to arrest two people for stealing. One com0lies and one resists. The person resisting is likely to be manhandled. E.g raiding of maralago. Also the person who complies is likely to benefit from leiniency
I disagree, but anyway it will be interesting to see how the courts decide on each of the charges. I see that in right wing circles many are promoting this idea of the system being harsh on Republicans but lenient on democrats. It will be interesting to see if leniency is granted to pence for complying.The one who complies is treated better by the arresting officer and the one who resists faces additional charges. The prosecutor is not the arresting officer though.
Pleading guilty can result in a more lenient sentence but rarely are charges just dropped (unless they know someone worse that they can rat out)
Cooperation doesn’t mean the charges just go away. Everyone says what’s different about Trump is that he didn’t cooperate, that’s obstruction, so charge him with obstruction but treat him the same as everyone else for having classified documents