• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Federal judge temporarily halts Tennessee's 'drag ban' law on free speech grounds

KCfromNC

Regular Member
Apr 18, 2007
30,256
17,181
✟545,630.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
You know what would be great? If having one of these questions answered means that someone would actually admit "hey, you're right, my objection was legitimate but now that it has been answered, I'm OK with the situation". But we never seem to read that. Instead, it's throw out one anti-factual objection, then when that is corrected, jump on to the next one. Almost as if these posts are hiding the real reasons for the opinions expressed in them.

Makes it hard to take any of them all that seriously.
 
Upvote 0

KCfromNC

Regular Member
Apr 18, 2007
30,256
17,181
✟545,630.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Awesome. Now let's ask why the media focus on drag queens at schools. Is it because it's a new phenomena?
It is not.
You'd have to ask far-right "news" sources why they're currently so very focused on what this group is doing rather than actual news, though.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: JustOneWay
Upvote 0

KCfromNC

Regular Member
Apr 18, 2007
30,256
17,181
✟545,630.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
You know how Jesus never tried to pretend He was someone else and Santa always is Santa
Uh, I hate to break it to you, but those people dressed up as Santa in malls?
Not actually the real Santa Claus.
 
Upvote 0

KCfromNC

Regular Member
Apr 18, 2007
30,256
17,181
✟545,630.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
The bottom line here is the drive to change what's inappropriate for children into being appropriate.
Can you expand on this what. What is this what, exactly?

Because from all the other posts trying to get to the reason falling flat, it really seems like the what is "something I don't like". And that's a pretty weak argument for canceling free speech. Interestingly enough, the judge mentioned in the OP felt the same way.
 
Upvote 0

Larniavc

"Larniavc sir, how are you so smart?"
Jul 14, 2015
15,009
9,186
52
✟391,651.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Yep make it seem as innocuous as possible. That's their goal.
Your saying guys who dress up as father Christmas are doing it to innocuously as possible sexual kids?
 
Upvote 0
Aug 29, 2005
34,371
11,479
✟206,635.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Private
You know how Jesus never tried to pretend He was someone else and Santa always is Santa but men dressing like women, we're supposed to be okay with that like wolves in sheeps clothing. We're not supposed to ask questions - just accept and look away while our kids are left behind.

Comparing Jesus to drag queens is sickening. Why is it allowed on a Christian forum?
Why are we still allowing people to dress as Santa to be around the children?
 
Upvote 0

YorkieGal

Glory to God
Sep 6, 2023
554
424
USA
✟28,516.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Can you expand on this what. What is this what, exactly?

Because from all the other posts trying to get to the reason falling flat, it really seems like the what is "something I don't like". And that's a pretty weak argument for canceling free speech. Interestingly enough, the judge mentioned in the OP felt the same way.
It's gross and degenerate. How plainly do you want or need it said? We see through the pretense of it all, we are calling it out, we don't accept it and we don't care that society is trying to normalize it because it is not normal.

What's with all the entrapment questions? Is this like a Columbo attempt?

Is this thread spent now? It's like a bad comedy skit where we all have to watch people go around and around on a stage acting like they can't hear when they get yelled at and making us pretend it's funny for sympathy for the bad actors.

YAWN.
 
Upvote 0

KCfromNC

Regular Member
Apr 18, 2007
30,256
17,181
✟545,630.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
It's gross and degenerate. How plainly do you want or need it said?

I appreciate the honesty. It isn't about anything in particular other than a vague feeling it is icky. Got it.

That's a terrific reason for people to not bring their own kids to it.

Unfortunately, though, a terrible reason for trying to ban it for other people. Which is probably why we get pages of pages of nonsensical made up reasons rather than the truth.
 
Upvote 0