FBI Knew New York Post’s Hunter Biden Laptop Story Was Real Ahead Of 2020 Election, FBI Form Shows

[The Barbarian]

Who is the big guy then?

At this point, all we know is that he isn't Joe Biden. They admitted that.

The crime would be bribery

But no one can show that it actually happened. Little details like that matter.

 

[Ana the Ist]

Simply Me seems to have deflated that story.

Can't answer?

 

[Ana the Ist]

So we are back to a claim by an anonymous source,

It's not anonymous. The FBI knows who it is.


Why hasn't the FBI come forward and said....

"We had permission from the president to review his financial records and we can say for certain that he received no money at all from Burisma or any of its associates for any actions taken as VP."


I mean....that would put all this to bed wouldn't it? It would be quick, easy, and show that the current president isn't a corrupt piece of garbage.

 

[SimplyMe]

Who is the big guy then? The crime would be bribery

Bribery for what? At the time, Joe Biden was a private citizen and held no government office; so what bribery?

It's not anonymous. The FBI knows who it is.


Why hasn't the FBI come forward and said....

"We had permission from the president to review his financial records and we can say for certain that he received no money at all from Burisma or any of its associates for any actions taken as VP."


I mean....that would put all this to bed wouldn't it? It would be quick, easy, and show that the current president isn't a corrupt piece of garbage.

Probably because the FBI essentially never comes forward to say that anyone is innocent or what their investigation has found (short of the evidence being part of an indictment, such as Trump's indictments). At the same time, I'm sure if the FBI made that statement, you'd still claim that he just has cash hidden somewhere, such as in his house (maybe in the walls where the police wouldn't have found it during a search, such as for the documents), or in a numbered account in an offshore bank. Which is part of the reason you wouldn't get the FBI (or other law enforcement) making those types of statements -- the best they can claim is "we found no evidence to suggest...."

 

[The Barbarian]

Simply Me seems to have deflated that story. And you apparently can't answer her.

Can't answer?

Or won't, Doesn't really matter, does it?

 

[The Barbarian]

I mean....that would put all this to bed wouldn't it? It would be quick, easy, and show that the current president isn't a corrupt piece of garbage.

Problem is, law enforcement needs evidence to justify rummaging around in people's personal papers. It's that darned Bill of Rights, again.

I don't think that particular protection is in the Russian Constitution.

Edit: And I get your dilemma. No evidence of Biden crimes, and you need evidence to go search everything he has. This wouldn't be problem for Putin, but things are a little different, here.

 

[BPPLEE]

Problem is, law enforcement needs evidence to justify rummaging around in people's personal papers. It's that darned Bill of Rights, again.

I don't think that particular protection is in the Russian Constitution.

Actually they need a reasonable, articulable suspicion to get a warrant. Evidence is what they hope to find .

 

[USincognito]

That's one way to spin it. It's false, but it is indeed the leftwing propaganda spin.

Nah. It's a fact.

 

[USincognito]

There is a website with the contents published

The Emails, pictures and what's app conversations have been published.

The contents of the hard drive have been put into congressional record

Congress has had hearings on a wide variety of the contents - live view on CSPAN

The only ones not talking about it seem to be the lap top deniers.

Then why can't any of the "Biden crime family" folks here articulate in simple terms a couple of Joe Biden's supposed crimes documented on the hard drive?

 

[hislegacy]

Then why can't any of the "Biden crime family" folks here articulate in simple terms a couple of Joe Biden's supposed crimes documented on the hard drive?

you would have to ask them -

I personally do not think there is anything short of Joe saying he did it - that would convince some.

 

[BPPLEE]

you would have to ask them -

I personally do not think there is anything short of Joe saying he did it - that would convince some.

Even that wouldn’t do it.

 

[The Barbarian]

What do you have that says Joe Biden did something illegal? I'm sure you get tired of people beating on you with that question, but it seems to me you could stop all that by just telling us.

We can post several links from the 634 page report to a website named after a famous explorer - but the problem is that Joe's drug addict son was so vulgar, so sexually promiscuous, so obscene that any literal link would be against CF's policy on vulgarity and inappropriate content.

There have been dozens of meetings - not shown on Democratic leaning media - available on CSpan - there have been close to 100 reports - all that can be found. Just denying it will not work because it has been way too public for way to long.

The usual: "we'd like to show you the evidence, but..."

Even the Trumpers don't deny it anymore.

You think no one has noticed?

 

[The Barbarian]

you would have to ask them -

I personally do not think there is anything short of Joe saying he did it - that would convince some.

I don't think we'll ever know. Every time someone starts asking for evidence, the Trumpers start making excuses and change the subject. And probably, a large portion of the public would remain skeptical.

Cry "wolf!" often enough and no one pays attention any longer.

 

[NxNW]

Because whoever the big guy is he was getting 10% of the money

Of what money? Thru what channels? On what date? For what reason?

 

[BPPLEE]

Of what money? Thru what channels? On what date? For what reason?

Lots of good questions. Sounds like someone should investigate

 

[USincognito]

you would have to ask them -

I'm asking you then. Why can't you concisely articulate a few points of clear evidence of the President engagement in illegal activity?

I personally do not think there is anything short of Joe saying he did it - that would convince some.

Oh the irony.

t's pretty simple. "Look at these forms!" and totemic phrases like "10% for big guy" aren't evidence.

 

[Pommer]

you would have to ask them -

I personally do not think there is anything short of Joe saying he did it - that would convince some.

Did what, exactly?
Is there a “crime” yet?

 

[Ana the Ist]

Notice the guy who said it, admits that it didn't refer to Joe Biden.

Proof?

 

[Ana the Ist]

Did what, exactly?
Is there a “crime” yet?

Took money for firing a prosecutor for one.

That's a crime.

 

[Ana the Ist]

Problem is, law enforcement needs evidence to justify rummaging around in people's personal papers. It's that darned Bill of Rights, again.

In other words....Biden isn't interested in clearing his name since so many dim witted people will just take his word for it.

We have plenty of bank records that show that the Biden family was in cahoots with Chinese business people that were, in turn, connected to the Communist party," Johnson said.

I'd say you could at least make it harder for our government to be corrupt but let's face it....you only care when it's the guy you don't want elected.