Professor Makes Suggestion of the Year

[Ana the Ist]

Redirect Notice

So a professor has the great and totally unexpected, unpredictable, idea to help remove "bigotry" in your children. Showing them a variety of penises and vaginas in class.

An activist University of British Columbia professor is under fire for claiming young children should be exposed to adult genitals — to prepare them for seeing naked trans people.

In her response, the academic sniffed: “Hey, want to know one of my all-time excellent parenting ideas? Let. Little. Children. See. Penises. And. Vulvas. Of. Various. Ages. And. Sizes. In. A. Casual. Normalized. Totally. Safe. Way.”

Personally, I think we should teach kids to run from people exposing genitalia to them, scream for help, and try to find an adult who isn't a sexual deviant to tell.

I don't have to wonder what's wrong with the teacher.


1. They're part of an activist group with an unhealthy obsession with sexualizing children under the guise of education.

2. They don't care who they hurt, permanently damage, put in harm's way, or psychologically scar for life...as long as it gets them whatever they want.

I'm more curious about those still supporting them. Do you know the difference between a slippery slope and a slippery slope fallacy? If people at least partially blocked their efforts to show genitalia to children in cartoonish children's books and now they want to just show kids the real deal until they're desensitized to it...which one do you think you're on?

A slippery slope?

Or an activist movement that has something to do with "rights"?

 

[RestoreTheJoy]

Redirect Notice

So a professor has the great and totally unexpected, unpredictable, idea to help remove "bigotry" in your children. Showing them a variety of penises and vaginas in class.

An activist University of British Columbia professor is under fire for claiming young children should be exposed to adult genitals — to prepare them for seeing naked trans people.

In her response, the academic sniffed: “Hey, want to know one of my all-time excellent parenting ideas? Let. Little. Children. See. Penises. And. Vulvas. Of. Various. Ages. And. Sizes. In. A. Casual. Normalized. Totally. Safe. Way.”

Personally, I think we should teach kids to run from people exposing genitalia to them, scream for help, and try to find an adult who isn't a sexual deviant to tell.

I don't have to wonder what's wrong with the teacher.


1. They're part of an activist group with an unhealthy obsession with sexualizing children under the guise of education.

2. They don't care who they hurt, permanently damage, put in harm's way, or psychologically scar for life...as long as it gets them whatever they want.

I'm more curious about those still supporting them. Do you know the difference between a slippery slope and a slippery slope fallacy? If people at least partially blocked their efforts to show genitalia to children in cartoonish children's books and now they want to just show kids the real deal until they're desensitized to it...which one do you think you're on?

A slippery slope?

Or an activist movement that has something to do with "rights"?

What? I thought this had to be a joke. Hope this person doesn't have children.

 

[jayem]

Strange. Although, by age 2-3, toddlers should know the difference between male and female, and with which sex they identify. By 5, children should know the proper names for male and female anatomy. They should also know their genitals aren't shameful. But they are private, and shouldn't be touched by anyone other than their parents, or legitimate health care professionals as part of a medical examination or other necessary procedure.

 

[ThatRobGuy]

Strange. Although, by age 2-3, toddlers should know the difference between male and female, and with which sex they identify. By 5, children should know the proper names for male and female anatomy.

...which is odd, because large swaths of adults seem to be rather confused by the topic.

They should also know their genitals aren't shameful. But they are private, and shouldn't be touched by anyone other than their parents, or legitimate health care professionals as part of a medical examination or other necessary procedure.

Someone should notify some of the organizers of the recent pride parades about the "they are private" part.

I used to actually go to those to support my cousin who's gay when he and his partner just wanted to wear rainbow t-shirts and get married...that's long since passed and they have that right now. When I saw two leather daddies (one spanking the other one who had a ball-gag in his mouth) participating in the festivities, that's when I realized that some of this stuff has gone off the rails.

I think you can still support gay rights without abandoning all contemporary mores. For instance, if a straight couple performing an act would be considered inappropriate, the fact that it's two gay guys doing it shouldn't cancel that out or make it an expression synonymous with "pride".

 

[jayem]

...which is odd, because large swaths of adults seem to be rather confused by the topic.

Sad, but true. One would think that in the 21st century, knowledge of basic biology wouldn't be hampered by outmoded Puritanism.

Someone should notify some of the organizers of the recent pride parades about the "they are private" part.

I used to actually go to those to support my cousin who's gay when he and his partner just wanted to wear rainbow t-shirts and get married...that's long since passed and they have that right now. When I saw two leather daddies (one spanking the other one who had a ball-gag in his mouth) participating in the festivities, that's when I realized that some of this stuff has gone off the rails.

I think you can still support gay rights without abandoning all contemporary mores. For instance, if a straight couple performing an act would be considered inappropriate, the fact that it's two gay guys doing it shouldn't cancel that out or make it an expression synonymous with "pride".

There are always those who push the envelope. But it's not a reliable way to effect social change.

 

[Servus]

Pretty clever to say exposing little children to smut, is fighting bigotry.

 

[Servus]

Personally, I think we should teach kids to run from people exposing genitalia to them, scream for help, and try to find an adult who isn't a sexual deviant to tell.

Pretty soon they're going to start saying teaching kids about "stranger danger" is prejudiced.

Or has that already happened?

 

[ImaginaryFiction]

Pretty soon they're going to start saying teaching kids about "stranger danger" is prejudiced.

Or has that already happened?

I remember when I was a kid on gi Joe they had a little psa at the end of episodes and some were about not talking to strangers, in spiderman comics they had one page ads with the power pack about inappropriate touching and a lot more. Now that has all but disappeared.

Now you actually have people publicly talking about touching children and sexualizing children and no one says a thing.

I am angered and saddened to see this kind of thing going on.

Minor-attracted persons: A neglected population

Such individuals who develop psychiatric symptoms deserve nonjudgmental treatment.

www.mdedge.com

Girl straddled by drag queen sparks outrage at North Carolina school

Footage shows the drag queen busting the lap dance-like move on the apparent teen at Forsyth Technical Community College’s Pride Fest, where students as young as 14 were invited.

nypost.com

Or the person mentioned in the OP.

even our own president touches and smells children live on national tv.

biden inappropriately with kids compilation｜TikTok Search

Discover videos related to biden inappropriately with kids compilation on TikTok.

www.tiktok.com

A family friendly labeled event with [bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse] ring toss.

Photos surface of sex-toy ring toss game at gay pride festival billed as 'family friendly.' Group in charge of game calls it a safe-sex icebreaker.

Photos have surfaced of a sex-toy ring toss game at a Florida gay pride festival over the weekend that was billed as "family friendly" and took place on public property, WWSB-TV reported.The group in charge of the game told the station it was meant as a safe-sex discussion icebreaker.The city of...

www.theblaze.com

I had a incident when I was a child and now as an adult I have no tolerance for anything even remotely sexualizing children. It angers me a great deal and it makes me sad to see our society allowing it to happen.

Even pushing transgender on small children is sexualizing them and it sickens me.

Or even seeing shows where pre teens enter the adult world of professional drag queens.

Drag Kids (2019) ⭐ 5.1 | Documentary

1h 20m

m.imdb.com

 

[RestoreTheJoy]

Strange. Although, by age 2-3, toddlers should know the difference between male and female, and with which sex they identify. By 5, children should know the proper names for male and female anatomy. They should also know their genitals aren't shameful. But they are private, and shouldn't be touched by anyone other than their parents, or legitimate health care professionals as part of a medical examination or other necessary procedure.

True. Any toddler who has siblings of the opposite sex sure knows all about it.