• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Feds Charge Hispanic Immigrant with Illegally Voting in Several Florida Elections, Lying on Immigration Forms

Whyayeman

Well-Known Member
Dec 8, 2018
4,626
3,133
Worcestershire
✟196,801.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
When republicans claim to want to "be tough on voter fraud" as a pretense for laws that are clearly designed to disenfranchise minority voters (or anyone else they think won't vote their way) democrats are quick to toss out a comically low estimate of how much of it takes place as a justification for why voter regulations are unnecessary.

Yet, when it's someone doing it for the republican side, conservatives want to downplay it, and liberals all of the sudden start pretending it's a "big deal".



Like with most other things, I'd like to see a little more consistency.
The real issue for me is that Trump claimed ahead of the 2020 election that he 'probably wouldn't accept the result' if he lost. He suggested that there was a conspiracy to 'steal' the election by Democrats. Then attempt after attempt was made to 'prove' this allegation - all fruitless, because no such conspiracy existed.

In fact, the majority of fraudulent voting in that and other elections has been traced to individuals with no known connection with one-another except for their votes for Republican candidates. I don't call that a conspiracy but it is a bit annoying.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: USincognito
Upvote 0

Sabertooth

Repartee Animal: Quipping the Saints!
Site Supporter
Jul 25, 2005
10,750
7,216
63
Wisconsin
Visit site
✟1,125,153.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Read the OP
I did. The defendant registered as a "Republican" during the commission of a crime.
Do you intend to remain obtuse in this matter?
 
Upvote 0

Tinker Grey

Wanderer
Site Supporter
Feb 6, 2002
11,659
6,154
Erewhon
Visit site
✟1,111,397.00
Faith
Atheist
I did. The defendant registered as a "Republican" during the commission of a crime.
Do you intend to remain obtuse in this matter?
Yes, exactly. The defendant registered as a Republican during the commission of a crime. What evidence to you have that this was a false flag operation?
 
  • Like
Reactions: USincognito
Upvote 0

Sabertooth

Repartee Animal: Quipping the Saints!
Site Supporter
Jul 25, 2005
10,750
7,216
63
Wisconsin
Visit site
✟1,125,153.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
What evidence to you have that this was a false flag operation?
Just as much as you do that she followed through on casting a vote for the Republican candidate, or can't you see that.
(Our ballots are secret over here.)
It cannot be ascertained.
 
Upvote 0

Tinker Grey

Wanderer
Site Supporter
Feb 6, 2002
11,659
6,154
Erewhon
Visit site
✟1,111,397.00
Faith
Atheist
Just as much as you do that she followed through on casting a vote for the Republican candidate, or can't you see that.
(Our ballots are secret over here.)
It cannot be ascertained.
I never said anything about her voting for a republican candidate. I say: Who she voted for is irrelevant.

Look, I think we're talking past each other. Sorry on my part. I'm out.
 
Upvote 0

Sabertooth

Repartee Animal: Quipping the Saints!
Site Supporter
Jul 25, 2005
10,750
7,216
63
Wisconsin
Visit site
✟1,125,153.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Who she voted for is irrelevant.
That is why people violate voting laws, to add an illegal vote to the candidate of their choice.
Her claim of being a Republican (on an illegal ballot) cannot be confirmed without knowing who she actually voted for --which we cannot know.
 
Upvote 0

Larniavc

"Encourage him to keep talking. He's hilarious."
Jul 14, 2015
14,618
8,938
52
✟382,169.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
I don't usually devolve into these type of discussions, but what are the Democrats saying about this?
They vehemently rebuke Trump when he says voter fraud, so they can't acknowledge fraud in that sense, but... if they voted Republican? That gets tempting. Lol
But this actually was shown to have happened.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JustOneWay
Upvote 0

Larniavc

"Encourage him to keep talking. He's hilarious."
Jul 14, 2015
14,618
8,938
52
✟382,169.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
I have a hard time believing that you would honestly proffer "No True Scotsman" and completely dismiss "false flag.*"
It smacks of gaslighting.

*"False flag" has not been proven, either, but I do not see how we can [be certain], either way, with only the information given.
Is clutching at straws a logical fallacy?
 
Upvote 0

Sabertooth

Repartee Animal: Quipping the Saints!
Site Supporter
Jul 25, 2005
10,750
7,216
63
Wisconsin
Visit site
✟1,125,153.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Is clutching at straws a logical fallacy?
No, trusting the declaration of convicted criminal (without corroborating evidence) is.
"Alright, I confess. Bob did it...!"
 
Upvote 0
Aug 29, 2005
34,371
11,479
✟206,635.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Private
That is why people violate voting laws, to add an illegal vote to the candidate of their choice.
Her claim of being a Republican (on an illegal ballot) cannot be confirmed without knowing who she actually voted for --which we cannot know.
For the umpteenth time, who she voted for is irrelevant. She claimed to be a member with the Republican Party of Florida. The ballot was not 'illegal'. She 'illegally' voted, and it was tallied.

The confirmation that she claimed to be a registered republican is right there in the legal court document, #30


 
Upvote 0

Whyayeman

Well-Known Member
Dec 8, 2018
4,626
3,133
Worcestershire
✟196,801.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Compared to the widespread voter fraud that got Biden elected.
That is a lie, I am afraid. You may have believed it when you were told it, but it is not true. It is better to trust evidence, but there is none.

There was no systematic fraud. The very few illegal votes cast in that election were a mixture of Democratic and Republican with only a slight favouring of one candidate - Trump. These votes were insignificant in every count. No results changed as a result of their detection.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: JustOneWay
Upvote 0

Sabertooth

Repartee Animal: Quipping the Saints!
Site Supporter
Jul 25, 2005
10,750
7,216
63
Wisconsin
Visit site
✟1,125,153.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
The confirmation that she claimed to be a registered republican is right there in the legal court document, #30
That was an assertion (of intent), not a confirmation.
What would satisfy you on this front?
As I said in an earlier post, we cannot know, either way, which side she was playing for without knowing her actual vote.
 
Upvote 0

Pommer

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic
Sep 13, 2008
22,373
13,820
Earth
✟240,145.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
That was an assertion (of intent), not a confirmation.

As I said in an earlier post, we cannot know, either way, which side she was playing for without knowing her actual vote.
Her “actual vote” don’t enter into it.
 
Upvote 0

ThatRobGuy

Part of the IT crowd
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2005
27,997
16,926
Here
✟1,455,020.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
The real issue for me is that Trump claimed ahead of the 2020 election that he 'probably wouldn't accept the result' if he lost. He suggested that there was a conspiracy to 'steal' the election by Democrats. Then attempt after attempt was made to 'prove' this allegation - all fruitless, because no such conspiracy existed.

In fact, the majority of fraudulent voting in that and other elections has been traced to individuals with no known connection with one-another except for their votes for Republican candidates. I don't call that a conspiracy but it is a bit annoying.
It shouldn't be surprising that a partially-deranged narcissist is unwilling to accept the reality that more Americans disliked him than liked him.

As I've stated before I didn't (and wouldn't if he gets the nomination) vote for Trump, too many character flaws...

But that being said, my main issue is with the inconsistency of people claiming that "voter fraud isn't an issue", "there's only been <insert comically low number here> confirmed cases of voter fraud", etc... But yet they always have bountiful examples in the hopper, ready to post, whenever there's a case where a republican gets caught doing it.


A person would have to be pretty damn naive to think that the only cases of improper voting that exist are the ones they actually catch doing it. (thus the reason why I support in-person voting with an ID requirement...though I disagree with the way republicans are trying to implement it due to the fact that they're doing it in ways that are deliberately targeting demographics that they don't think will vote their way)

It's sort of like drunk driving...one would be have to be incredibly stupid to think that the only ones out there guilty of driving drunk are the people who actually got pulled over and arrested for it. The reality is, there have been more people who have done it and gotten away with it undetected. There are probably more people who have driven home completely wasted (and got away with it) than people who actually got caught doing it.

I see voter fraud in the same way. Do I think irregularities changed the outcome of the election? No...Biden won fair and square (and would have even if they didn't change the rules for covid...over half of the country was sick of Trump)...but do I think that voter fraud was limited to the 475 cases they could actually prove (in an election with 155 ballots cast)? No, you'd have to be extremely gullible to believe that they could lock things down that tight in an environment of universal mail-in ballots and unmonitored drop boxes.
 
Upvote 0