- Jul 25, 2005
- 10,750
- 7,216
- 63
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Charismatic
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
What evidence?...as all the evidence indicates.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
What evidence?...as all the evidence indicates.
The real issue for me is that Trump claimed ahead of the 2020 election that he 'probably wouldn't accept the result' if he lost. He suggested that there was a conspiracy to 'steal' the election by Democrats. Then attempt after attempt was made to 'prove' this allegation - all fruitless, because no such conspiracy existed.When republicans claim to want to "be tough on voter fraud" as a pretense for laws that are clearly designed to disenfranchise minority voters (or anyone else they think won't vote their way) democrats are quick to toss out a comically low estimate of how much of it takes place as a justification for why voter regulations are unnecessary.
Yet, when it's someone doing it for the republican side, conservatives want to downplay it, and liberals all of the sudden start pretending it's a "big deal".
Like with most other things, I'd like to see a little more consistency.
I did. The defendant registered as a "Republican" during the commission of a crime.Read the OP
No, there's actually evidence for the case mentioned in the OP.Compared to the widespread voter fraud that got Biden elected.
Yes, exactly. The defendant registered as a Republican during the commission of a crime. What evidence to you have that this was a false flag operation?I did. The defendant registered as a "Republican" during the commission of a crime.
Do you intend to remain obtuse in this matter?
This is untrue, and the courts proved it was untrue. Please provide your evidence, or withdraw your accusation.Compared to the widespread voter fraud that got Biden elected.
Just as much as you do that she followed through on casting a vote for the Republican candidate, or can't you see that.What evidence to you have that this was a false flag operation?
I never said anything about her voting for a republican candidate. I say: Who she voted for is irrelevant.Just as much as you do that she followed through on casting a vote for the Republican candidate, or can't you see that.
(Our ballots are secret over here.)
It cannot be ascertained.
That is why people violate voting laws, to add an illegal vote to the candidate of their choice.Who she voted for is irrelevant.
But this actually was shown to have happened.I don't usually devolve into these type of discussions, but what are the Democrats saying about this?
They vehemently rebuke Trump when he says voter fraud, so they can't acknowledge fraud in that sense, but... if they voted Republican? That gets tempting. Lol
Is clutching at straws a logical fallacy?I have a hard time believing that you would honestly proffer "No True Scotsman" and completely dismiss "false flag.*"
It smacks of gaslighting.
*"False flag" has not been proven, either, but I do not see how we can [be certain], either way, with only the information given.
No, trusting the declaration of convicted criminal (without corroborating evidence) is.Is clutching at straws a logical fallacy?
For the umpteenth time, who she voted for is irrelevant. She claimed to be a member with the Republican Party of Florida. The ballot was not 'illegal'. She 'illegally' voted, and it was tallied.That is why people violate voting laws, to add an illegal vote to the candidate of their choice.
Her claim of being a Republican (on an illegal ballot) cannot be confirmed without knowing who she actually voted for --which we cannot know.
That is a lie, I am afraid. You may have believed it when you were told it, but it is not true. It is better to trust evidence, but there is none.Compared to the widespread voter fraud that got Biden elected.
The "widespread voter fraud" fir which there's no evidence?Compared to the widespread voter fraud that got Biden elected.
That was an assertion (of intent), not a confirmation.The confirmation that she claimed to be a registered republican is right there in the legal court document, #30
As I said in an earlier post, we cannot know, either way, which side she was playing for without knowing her actual vote.What would satisfy you on this front?
Her “actual vote” don’t enter into it.That was an assertion (of intent), not a confirmation.
As I said in an earlier post, we cannot know, either way, which side she was playing for without knowing her actual vote.
It shouldn't be surprising that a partially-deranged narcissist is unwilling to accept the reality that more Americans disliked him than liked him.The real issue for me is that Trump claimed ahead of the 2020 election that he 'probably wouldn't accept the result' if he lost. He suggested that there was a conspiracy to 'steal' the election by Democrats. Then attempt after attempt was made to 'prove' this allegation - all fruitless, because no such conspiracy existed.
In fact, the majority of fraudulent voting in that and other elections has been traced to individuals with no known connection with one-another except for their votes for Republican candidates. I don't call that a conspiracy but it is a bit annoying.