What is the sudden attraction to children?

[KCfromNC]

What are you talking about?

The fact I've seen zero threads about horrible it is that divorced people are allowed around children versus the pearl-clutching we get when they're around performers in the wrong types of clothes. It kinda shows that claims like "Sexual imorality is sexual immorality. Why would you seek to separate sexual immorality into sub sections. " really don't line up with the very specific targeting of certain groups by far-right propaganda.

Son, you got lucky. I myself am a Straight Divorced Man. SO I know all about this and can give it to you straight, Lol! I've been divorced since Oct of 2010 so a bit of time has passed

Hopefully people are as up in arms if you're ever allowed near children as you seem to be about drag performers. After all, "Sexual imorality is sexual immorality", at least if we're to believe that excuse. I mean, I know the reasoning isn't supposed to be taken seriously, it's just a rationalization which paints a thin veneer over "gay people icky" for those that want to believe. But be careful - some people might actually get the idea to listen to those claims and put them into practice.

Someone asked me, I forget who, something about am I scared that I'll contract the gay virus or something idk.

Honestly, kind of. I feel like, Eww, get it off.

I admire that posts like this have stopped hiding behind all of the rationalizations for the attacks on gay and trans people.

Like that one thread said, thie material world is only 5% of reality. And I'm here to tell you that the other 95% that they can't see, is the Spiritual Realm/ Kingdom of God. How can you guys cling to worldly justifications, knowing that you have at best only 5% of the data?

Pro-tip : having a random opinion doesn't turn that guess into facts for other people.

 

[perplexed]

I like some Drag performances, am I a bad person?

 

[KCfromNC]

Give it a couple years.....

How quickly we go from oh no, it's happening everywhere to just you wait, it'll happen any time now, honest once the far-right mythology runs into reality.

Why do conservative talking points so often need to be supported by making stuff up?

 

[KCfromNC]

I hate when people just throw links over the fence and expect others to anticipate the point of those throwing it over the fence.

Makes it easier to accuse people of missing the point when the point is intentionally obscured.

 

[KCfromNC]

From that organization's own site: "DSH captures the imagination and play of the gender fluidity of childhood and gives kids glamorous, positive, and unabashedly queer role models."

So it's not about promoting reading. They want kids to see queer people as role models. (Unless you think they're lying about their intentions)

Research does show that kids are more likely to be successful if they see role models similar to themselves but older. And likewise, seeing no one like themselves makes it harder. So not so much saying that all kids should look up to queer adults, but more showing some kids that there are adults like them who are doing OK.

Which I guess is the point of trying to stuff gay people back into hiding - a misguided attempt to get some children to think there's something wrong with themselves. I don't quite see the point myself, doesn't seem like a particularly healthy way to raise kids.

 

[KCfromNC]

I thought the spokesmodel was a transgender person?

Conservative propaganda is seldom that specific (or concerned with reality). Unless it is concerned with excusing the sins of people who they think will vote for them, of course, then split as many hairs as needed.

 

[JustOneWay]

They learned from the cancel-culture originators on the other side. Boomerang effect, if you will.

The other side? Canceling others has been around as long as humans. If we just look at America, the colonists started off in this country by cancelling the indigenous peoples....so they could claim the land for their own. If you want to blame one side for something everybody has been doing forever, that is your prerogative but it seems typical for the average uneducated American not to understand history.

 

[JustOneWay]

Oh so that was a taste of photoshop lies by the sodomites, I get it now. Haha.

No, it is real and your comment was spot-on. Had you known who that person was you may have said something different and defended the man. But you did not - you spoke the truth as you know it. Your comment was much better than I had ever expected, and it actually made my day! thanks,

 

[Divide]

You are the one who lumped all “sexual sin” into single group. You.

If one should be shunned then should not the others?

Perhaps in God's eyes. But there is a difference between me and God. I am not God. I am not perfect. I am merely forgiven, ok? So I but a man and prone to stumble. So to God the answer may be yes? But for me...I find that those men who would lie with another man, or women with women to be seriously shunned, avoided, and left to their own devices because that is a totally abnormal interaction of humankind. Man with man? Say what? Wow.

But my non gay divorced friend who cheated on his wife with another woman, is still welcome in my house. And he doesn't come over chanting "Gay rights- Gay rights"...come on, that's absurd for you to try to compare a sinning heterosexual with a sinning weirdo that dabbles in same sex sex. Ewwww! Get them out of here!

And I also do understand that this is not the Love of Christ coming out of me, so I will need to repent and ask forgiveness from God for my transgression. After all, I never said I was a perfect Christian. I am a forgiven Christian.

That answer you?

 

[Desk trauma]

Perhaps in God's eyes. But there is a difference between me and God. I am not God. I am not perfect. I am merely forgiven, ok? So I but a man and prone to stumble. So to God the answer may be yes? But for me...I find that those men who would lie with another man, or women with women to be seriously shunned, avoided, and left to their own devices because that is a totally abnormal interaction of humankind. Man with man? Say what? Wow.

But my non gay divorced friend who cheated on his wife with another woman, is still welcome in my house. And he doesn't come over chanting "Gay rights- Gay rights"...come on, that's absurd for you to try to compare a sinning heterosexual with a sinning weirdo that dabbles in same sex sex. Ewwww! Get them out of here!

And I also do understand that this is not the Love of Christ coming out of me, so I will need to repent and ask forgiveness from God for my transgression. After all, I never said I was a perfect Christian. I am a forgiven Christian.

That answer you?

So much for not subdividing sexual immorality into categories.

 

[Divide]

The fact I've seen zero threads about horrible it is that divorced people are allowed around children versus the pearl-clutching we get when they're around performers in the wrong types of clothes. It kinda shows that claims like "Sexual imorality is sexual immorality. Why would you seek to separate sexual immorality into sub sections. " really don't line up with the very specific targeting of certain groups by far-right propaganda.

Who is far right? I said who I am. Nobody. SOme retired guy. I am no acitivist for anything and don't watch the political news except by chance sometimes. So I have not targeted anyone for anything. I expressed that I hold to Traditional morals and values, That's all! I am conservitive, so what? Am I now targeted by the weirdos for having conservetive values? How could you fringe people say that I am wrong in my opinions or I am a bad person for thinking differently than you? Doesn't that sort of contradict the position and argument that you are taking to hold to?

Created yourself a small paradox there didn't you?! Lol.

Hopefully people are as up in arms if you're ever allowed near children as you seem to be about drag performers. After all, "Sexual imorality is sexual immorality", at least if we're to believe that excuse. I mean, I know the reasoning isn't supposed to be taken seriously, it's just a rationalization which paints a thin veneer over "gay people icky" for those that want to believe. But be careful - some people might actually get the idea to listen to those claims and put them into practice.

Hahaha, a little projection perhap? Lol.
As up in arms as I am about Drag Performers...Lol!
Surely you jest. Did I come to the Christian forum starting threads about Drag Performers? No, the Drag performers came to my site and started trying to push their filth on me!
Better try again!

Sexual immorality is sexual immorality. Even in heterosexuals. Tis' a fact. But I'm not God. I'm just a man, and sexually deviant people are spooky to me. So is it all right if I keep my hand on my pistol while those people are in the room? (Oh, Lord, please forgive me, but they are weird!)

If you like, I'd be happy to post the pertinant scriptures for you that explain...male and female created He man. You forgot to post your scripture which says And Trans people and Drag Queens are made in the image of God? It just says, Male and Female. Huh.

I admire that posts like this have stopped hiding behind all of the rationalizations for the attacks on gay and trans people.

Are you trying to be an evil genius? It's not working very good. Christians attacked you? But wait a minute, didn't you come to the Christian website and start preaching gay tripe?

Who's attacking who here boy?

Pro-tip : having a random opinion doesn't turn that guess into facts for other people.

And feeling inside like you are a woman even though born bilologically a man does not change the fact that he is a man, Scientifically, Biologically, or Spiritually. If you think you are a woman in a mans body, then that may indicate demon possession or mental illness, take your pick.

 

[Divide]

So much for not subdividing sexual immorality into categories.

I'll sub divide them when they walk down my street. Hey! I am an imperfect Christian! I'm sorry I am not perfect! It is what it is.

 

[JustOneWay]

Are you trying to be an evil genius? It's not working very good. Christians attacked you? But wait a minute, didn't you come to the Christian website and start preaching gay tripe?

Who's attacking who here boy?

I don't recall you being around when KC started posting here. Were you here by some other name?

 

[DaisyDay]

Perhaps in God's eyes. But there is a difference between me and God. I am not God. I am not perfect. I am merely forgiven, ok? So I but a man and prone to stumble.

Is anyone in your church, or any other, perfect or are they sinners?

So to God the answer may be yes? But for me...I find that those men who would lie with another man, or women with women to be seriously shunned, avoided, and left to their own devices because that is a totally abnormal interaction of humankind. Man with man? Say what? Wow.

It's not abnormal for them, evidently.

But my non gay divorced friend who cheated on his wife with another woman, is still welcome in my house. And he doesn't come over chanting "Gay rights- Gay rights"...come on, that's absurd for you to try to compare a sinning heterosexual with a sinning weirdo that dabbles in same sex sex. Ewwww! Get them out of here!

Now this is something I don't understand - adultery is forbidden by the Ten Commandments, but not homosexuality, so why do 10C adherents find the latter a worse sin than the former?

And I also do understand that this is not the Love of Christ coming out of me, so I will need to repent and ask forgiveness from God for my transgression. After all, I never said I was a perfect Christian. I am a forgiven Christian.

That answer you?

Sure, if an admission of hypocrisy is an answer. Of course, the other going theory is that this is so over the top that it is actually a Poeish parody.

 

[Desk trauma]

I'll sub divide them when they walk down my street.

Quite the departure from this:

Sexual imorality is sexual immorality. Why would you seek to separate sexual immorality into sub sections.

 

[Divide]

Is anyone in your church, or any other, perfect or are they sinners?

It's not abnormal for them, evidently.

the other going theory is that this is so over the top that it is actually a Poeish parody..../

WHat happened with Poe? Did he kill a gay man and then write a poem about it or something? Good for him if he did. So what? All that proves is that you found someone else who didn't like gays besides me. Lol.

We are, after all, the majority!

 

[DaisyDay]

I like some Drag performances, am I a bad person?

On the old SNL, Kate McKinnon and Aidy Bryant were spot on in their male impersonations.

 

[Desk trauma]

the other going theory is that this is so over the top that it is actually a Poeish parody..../

WHat happened with Poe? Did he kill a gay man and then write a poem about it or something? Good for him if he did. So what? All that proves is that you found someone else who didn't like gays besides me. Lol.

Poes law.

 

[Larniavc]

WHat happened with Poe

A Poe is some comment that is so outlandish, out of touch or offensive that it is nevertheless casually mistaken for an actual Christian position.

 

[Divide]

Now this is something I don't understand - adultery is forbidden by the Ten Commandments, but not homosexuality, so why do 10C adherents find the latter a worse sin than the former?

Oh, I'm sorry the Bible does that sometimes. It will talk about a topic briefly in one spot and then give more details in another spot. So here is the missing verses which explain in more deatil about homosexuality.

Leviticus 20: 10-22
10 And the man that committeth adultery with another man's wife, even he that committeth adultery with his neighbour's wife, the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death.

11 And the man that lieth with his father's wife hath uncovered his father's nakedness: both of them shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

12 And if a man lie with his daughter in law, both of them shall surely be put to death: they have wrought confusion; their blood shall be upon them.

13 If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

14 And if a man take a wife and her mother, it is wickedness: they shall be burnt with fire, both he and they; that there be no wickedness among you.

15 And if a man lie with a beast, he shall surely be put to death: and ye shall slay the beast.

16 And if a woman approach unto any beast, and lie down thereto, thou shalt kill the woman, and the beast: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

17 And if a man shall take his sister, his father's daughter, or his mother's daughter, and see her nakedness, and she see his nakedness; it is a wicked thing; and they shall be cut off in the sight of their people: he hath uncovered his sister's nakedness; he shall bear his iniquity.

18 And if a man shall lie with a woman having her sickness, and shall uncover her nakedness; he hath discovered her fountain, and she hath uncovered the fountain of her blood: and both of them shall be cut off from among their people.

19 And thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of thy mother's sister, nor of thy father's sister: for he uncovereth his near kin: they shall bear their iniquity.

20 And if a man shall lie with his uncle's wife, he hath uncovered his uncle's nakedness: they shall bear their sin; they shall die childless.

21 And if a man shall take his brother's wife, it is an unclean thing: he hath uncovered his brother's nakedness; they shall be childless.

22 Ye shall therefore keep all my statutes, and all my judgments, and do them: that the land, whither I bring you to dwell therein, spue you not out.../KJV

I do hope this clarification of details helps you with your confusion on the subject.