Teutonic means Germans, who are also called the Aryans. There are many overlord kingdoms that came from these people. (The Mitanni and Hittites are the two you might be more familiar with. The Mitanni were the foreign overlords of the Hurrians. The Hittites took over the Hatti kingdom with whom the Egyptians had dealt.) But the Saxons were the Sacae from beyond Iran... they were Scythians. The Scythians chased the Cimmerians off the Caspian steppe into the Chersonesus. And the Cimbri are probably the Cimmerians. These Cimbri show up on Cirencester's map, here:
View attachment 327041
See them? Cimbri are at KL and ED on the Cornish Peninsula. They weren't in Silurian Wales, but in Devon and Somerset... apparently a conquest is responsible for the name Cambrian farther north, and the addition of "Cymry" into Silurian history. The Cymry were never Silurians... they mention the Silurian Dialect as being what the Bardic ordinances were written in.
All of Wales was originally either Silurian or their dependent tribes, the Demetae and the Ordovices, and the Ordivices' dependent tribe seated on the Snowdon Range and on the island next to it. The older writers came to the conclusion that the Indigenous Silurians were an Iberian Tribe, and that the Druids were from these tribes. Modernists say the Celts of Caesar were the Druids, but it isn't true. The Celts had a very different religion from that...
and were big strawberry blondes, not small dark Welsh and Cornish.
People like to think Cirencester was a fraud because that's what they tend to call all inconvenient history, these days.
The Latins are originally Ligurians whom the ancient authors say lived on the southern coast of Portugal and were known as the Cynetes (in several different spellings). The whole Iberian Peninsula was called Ligurian, back in the day. But the Celts invaded. And then Augustus Caesar took some Ligurian tribes and switched them with two North African tribes who were called Iberian, etc.
Ligurian tribes were in France and Liguria and Italy. The legend of Marsailles says a Ligurian princess chose a Greek husband. Just above Marsailles was the Ligurian Nemeton (aka, Druid grove) whom the Romans burned down to support the Greeks.
The Lepontic Inscriptions are Ligurian, as proven by Whatmough. Celtic from the center is the theory that the Celtic language developed in Gaul... by Patrick Sims-Williams.
Peet is the archaeologist who pulled together previous Italian writings, and says that Italy was a Ligurian peninsula, in a book called the Stone and Bronze Ages in Italy and Sicily.
Ridgeway, in a paper called Who were the Romans?, pulls together the Greek writings that show the Indigenes of Rome to have been the Ligurians. And he says that the incoming Pelasgians worked with the Ligurians against the common enemy: Umbrians and Sabines... which were Gaulish tribes, similar to what we call Celts today. The Ligurians melded with the pre-Greek Pelasgians and together were called the Plebeians, while the Gauls became the Patricians of Rome by conquest.
It happens everywhere. The incoming invaders are overlords of the indigenous plebeian/peon. The Roman Empire wasn't being run by the Ligurians or the Pelasgians... it was run by the Gauls who ruled Rome.
So... where did the Gauls come from? What language did they speak before they learned Ligurian Latin? My guess would be that the people called Celts were the ones who made that jewelry. Halstatt wasn't Celtic, it seems to have been Slavic or Germanic. The same shield wikipedia used to call Celtic they used to call Scythian at the same time... they weren't wrong. Except German is not Celtic... so why do the Scandinavians speak Germanic?
People who don't learn their history are doomed to repeat it.
No wonder the ruling people destroy histories and/or call them forgeries.
And yet Christian does not mean "Chosen race" in any way shape or form., so you might as well give that part up.
That was a brilliantly longwinded and informative post that in no way answered my question directed to you. So I shall repeat my question:
And tell me: what actually IS the difference between the Teutonic 'race' and the Latin 'race'? Since you seem to support the idea that they are different races, there must be some way to tell them apart. And no, language, culture and art are not indicative of race.
And this is just a massive non-sequitur comment on a post that already makes zero sense.
Oh well, at least it was an "informative post", right?
Language, Burial-Rites/Religion, Archaeology and Literature were used to determine Ethnology, back in the day.
Now, there's a melting-pot-theory in the mainstream... so those who follow the mainstream are all the same.
You haven't noticed the terms "small dark" and "big blonde"
in my post to which you've replied,* or you might not
still be asking me how to tell "Latin race" from "Teutonic race".
_________________________________________________
* End of the 3rd paragraph in the first quote above... I've colored it so you won't miss it again... you're welcome.
The difference between Celts and Germans: the Germans were more blonde than Caesar's Gauls/Celts.
Last edited:
Upvote
0