Body-Cam Footage Confirms Paul Pelosi Opened Door for Police, Contradicts DOJ Account

[HARK!]

Newly revealed body-cam footage reportedly contradicts the Department of Justice’s account of the sequence of events that led up to the attack on Paul Pelosi, the husband of outgoing Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, confirming that Pelosi opened the door for the police officers who responded to the 911 call he placed from his residence.

Body-Cam Footage Confirms Paul Pelosi Opened Door for Police, Contradicts DOJ Account

A new report from the Bay Area NBC affiliate contradicts the DOJ's account of the attack on Paul Pelosi, confirming that he opened the door for police at his residence.

www.yahoo.com

 

[Brother-Mike]

The first rule of Underwear Hammer Fight Club is that you don’t talk about Underwear Hammer Fight Club

 

[HARK!]

The first rule of Underwear Hammer Fight Club is that you don’t talk about Underwear Hammer Fight Club

Hours after the segment aired live on NBC, it was deleted from the Today Show website and an editor’s note was appended to the page.


“The piece should not have aired because it did not meet NBC News reporting standards,” the editor’s note reads.


The official Today Show Twitter account also deleted a tweet promoting the segment.


The retraction came after several prominent social-media users took notice of the strange new details NBC had reported. Several digital outlets, including the Daily Mail, had also aggregated NBC’s reporting and cast it in a conspiratorial light.

NBC Retracts Report That Exposed New Details in Pelosi-Attack Investigation | National Review

When police arrived, Pelosi ‘began walking several feet back towards the assailant and away from police,’ NBC reported in the since-deleted segment.

www.nationalreview.com

 

[Sparagmos]

Newly revealed body-cam footage reportedly contradicts the Department of Justice’s account of the sequence of events that led up to the attack on Paul Pelosi, the husband of outgoing Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, confirming that Pelosi opened the door for the police officers who responded to the 911 call he placed from his residence.

Body-Cam Footage Confirms Paul Pelosi Opened Door for Police, Contradicts DOJ Account

A new report from the Bay Area NBC affiliate contradicts the DOJ's account of the attack on Paul Pelosi, confirming that he opened the door for police at his residence.

www.yahoo.com

What else did the body cam footage show? Did it show the attack snd debunk the underwear theory?

 

[HARK!]

What else did the body cam footage show?

I haven't seen the footage first hand.

 

[BobRyan]

Well we are getting closer to the truth --

Body-Cam Footage Confirms Paul Pelosi Opened Door for Police, Contradicts DOJ Account

A new report from the Bay Area NBC affiliate contradicts the DOJ's account of the attack on Paul Pelosi, confirming that he opened the door for police at his residence.

www.yahoo.com

 

[NinjaPirate777]

What a horrible thing to happen. I hope he recovers from the attack.

 

[Whyayeman]

I haven't seen the footage first hand.

And now nobody will. It would be best to agree that it was faked.

 

[FreeinChrist]

Newly revealed body-cam footage reportedly contradicts the Department of Justice’s account of the sequence of events that led up to the attack on Paul Pelosi, the husband of outgoing Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, confirming that Pelosi opened the door for the police officers who responded to the 911 call he placed from his residence.

Body-Cam Footage Confirms Paul Pelosi Opened Door for Police, Contradicts DOJ Account

A new report from the Bay Area NBC affiliate contradicts the DOJ's account of the attack on Paul Pelosi, confirming that he opened the door for police at his residence.

www.yahoo.com

The initial accounts said Pelosi opened the door, with his left hand, and the other was on DePape's hand or arm. The mental state of Pelosi was not clearly stated,. The NBC reporter said Pelosi did not indicate there was an emergency to the police and THAT part of the report was what caused NBC to pull the report. Other reports said differently.

Point is - what does that matter to you HARK!? It has been discussed in other threads.
Do you think Pelosi was not hit in the head with a hammer?
Do you think it was not DePape that did that?
Do you think there wasn't really a camera recording DePape breaking in the back door?
Do you disbelieve what the police said DePape said? That it was a "suicide mission"? That DePape wanted to detain and question Nancy Pelosi and that he said he would "break her kneecaps if she lied"?
Do you disbelieve that DePape brought the hammer?
Do you disbelieve that 82 year old Paul Pelosi was woken in the middle of the night?
Do you doubt that Pelosi called 911 and left the phone open to the call after waking up?

Paul Pelosi was sharp enough to talk DePape into letting him use the bathroom (where he used a phone), but isn't it possible he didn't do everything as sharply as he could because he is 82 and was woken from sleep? My dad wouldn't have been the sharpest person at that age when woken from sleep.

Why is this a big deal?

 

[HARK!]

And now nobody will. It would be best to agree that it was faked.

Suggesting that the SFPD faked body cam footage seems a little far fetched. I think that it's far more likely that the DOJ doesn't have their facts straight.

 

[HARK!]

Why is this a big deal?

I think that it's a big deal when the official report of the SFPD contradicts the official report of the DOJ. I think that the facts of an official investigation matter. The truth matters to me.

If the facts of the case don't matter; then it's no big deal.

 

[Whyayeman]

Suggesting that the SFPD faked body cam footage seems a little far fetched. I think that it's far more likely that the DOJ doesn't have their facts straight.

But I didn't make such a claim. There was a sound reason that the footage was withdrawn. I think not meeting the standards of professional journalism means that the footage could not be authenticated or verified.

I think that it's a big deal when the official report of the SFPD contradicts the official report of the DOJ.

It would be if it had happened. You are pinning your case on something you did not see. And none of will.

 

[HARK!]

But I didn't make such a claim. There was a sound reason that the footage was withdrawn. I think not meeting the standards of professional journalism means that the footage could not be authenticated or verified.

You're entitled to your speculation.

It would be if it had happened. You are pinning your case on something you did not see. And none of will.

Are you suggesting that I should take your word over the MSM?

We can settle this. Produce the police reports from the SFPD, and the DOJ, and demonstrate that there is no contradiction.

 

[wing2000]

We can settle this. Produce the police reports from the SFPD, and the DOJ, and demonstrate that there is no contradiction.

Go for it.

 

[Whyayeman]

You're entitled to your speculation.

Are you suggesting that I should take your word over the MSM?

We can settle this. Produce the police reports from the SFPD, and the DOJ, and demonstrate that there is no contradiction.

You made the claim that these two agencies have contradicted one another. I think it is up to you to back that up. I won't be doing your homework for you.

 

[HARK!]

Go for it.

That's not how burden of proof works. I present a credible source to support my statement. If you care to attempt to refute it; then the onus is on you to bring forth a more credible source.

 

[FreeinChrist]

I think that it's a big deal when the official report of the SFPD contradicts the official report of the DOJ. I think that the facts of an official investigation matter. The truth matters to me.

If the facts of the case don't matter; then it's no big deal.

So the DOJ said, in a public press conference, the officers opened the door after the officers said Pelosi opened the door. The body cam shows Pelosi opened the door.

and so? There will be a trial. The body-cams will be evidence as will the testimony of the officers. There is the video showing DePepe breaking in. There will be the writings and the interview done with DePape, and what he said.

I think we need to be careful and not create conspiracy where there really isn't anything. A "truth" is not being hidden. The prosecutors are going to be careful with the evidence. Conspiracy stores are made everyday and so I agree with them being careful with it.

 

[HARK!]

You made the claim that these two agencies have contradicted one another. I think it is up to you to back that up. I won't be doing your homework for you.

Do my homework for me? That's a hoot! I already did your homework for you. It's in the OP. I can't read it for you too.

 

[HARK!]

So the DOJ said, in a public press conference, the officers opened the door after the officers said Pelosi opened the door. The body cam shows Pelosi opened the door.

Exactly.

Which account is the truth? It is reported that a witness to the body cam evidence claims that the evidence backs the SFPD's report.

I think we need to be careful and not create conspiracy where there really isn't anything.

I haven't seen the footage first hand.

And now nobody will. It would be best to agree that it was faked.

 

[FreeinChrist]

Exactly.

Which account is the truth? It is reported that a witness to the body cam evidence claims that the evidence backs the SFPD's report.

Which account is the truth? It is reported that a witness to the body cam evidence claims that the evidence backs the SFPD's report.

Well, I figure you probably answered it- the body cam backs the SFPD's report and it was SFPD that was there at the house.

So the DOJ misspoke at the first (and only, I think) press conference. So what? Is the investigation all done? And don't you think that in preparing the case for court, the prosecutors will go over all that the police provide?

I think you are making a mountain out of a molehill.


(I don't know why there are two copies of your post in the quotes)