- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,851,397
- 51,536
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
LOL -- solid gold.Poisoning the well.
You believe what you want to, Kylie, and I'll believe what I want to.
How's that?
Upvote
0
LOL -- solid gold.Poisoning the well.
LOL -- solid gold.
You believe what you want to, Kylie, and I'll believe what I want to.
How's that?
Indeed it is.I'm simply pointing out the logical fallacy you are using. The fact that you are using such fallacies (as well as the fact that you apparently are unable to respond to any of the other points I raised) is there for all to see and make up their own minds.
Indeed it is.
And I think also that I have gained a little more insight into why you think the way you do.
You apparently get your theology from a circle of traditionalists who ... it sounds to me like ... tell you what you want to hear.
You left two key words out, didn't you?I'm simply pointing out that the majority Christian position is that Moses wrote the first five books of the Old Testament.
We call that "blasphemy".Sorry, last I heard, Christian tradition held that Moses, not God, wrote Genesis.
Sure. You believe what you want. As long as you limit yourself to believing, you are harmless, innocuous.LOL -- solid gold.
You believe what you want to, Kylie, and I'll believe what I want to.
How's that?
And why would Kylie have to add the "not God" stipulation? Isn't the mentioning of Moses not enough to exclude all the other. In your opinion, she would have to writeYou left two key words out, didn't you?
"Sorry, last I heard, Christian tradition held that Moses, not God, wrote Genesis."
We call that "blasphemy".
Who baited creationist teachers by hiring someone to teach evolution, then got the ACLU involved, culminating in a famous monkey trial in 1925? Hmmm?You also find the need to spread your creationist nonsense.
She didn't add it.And why would Kylie have to add the "not God" stipulation?
Then, after I replied, she said ...Sorry, last I heard, Christian tradition held that Moses, not God, wrote Genesis.
Notice how she changed "Christian tradition" to "majority Christian position" and took out "not God"?I'm simply pointing out that the majority Christian position is that Moses wrote the first five books of the Old Testament.
She didn't add it.
She took it out.
First she said ...
Then, after I replied, she said ...
Notice how she changed "Christian tradition" to "majority Christian position" and took out "not God"?
Joshua and Caleb.Because who cares what the majority thinks?
Creationist teachers? Creationist obscurantists will be more accurate.Who baited creationist teachers by hiring someone to teach evolution, then got the ACLU involved, culminating in a famous monkey trial in 1925? Hmmm?
For anyone committed to the Bible, I think they should accept YEC as a creation myth.
And why would Kylie have to add the "not God" stipulation?
You guys want to debate the question of once-saved-always-saved? Good. Fine. But the moment you cross the fence and make statements about the physical world you enter science's realm and play by science's rules.
The changing of water into wine at the wedding at Cana? A very material thing. Hence, you play by science's rules.
Because theres too much evidence all around us that it cant possibly be literally true.I'll take the bait.
I am committed to the Bible. Why should I accept young-earth creationism (YEC) as a creation myth?
Because theres too much evidence all around us that it cant possibly be literally true.