from your link -
"Total depravity
"Despite its name, the doctrine of total depravity does not mean men are always and only sinful. Calvinists do not think we are as sinful as we possibly could be. They claim our free will has been injured by original sin to the point that, unless God gives us special grace, we cannot free ourselves from sin and choose to serve God in love. We might choose to serve him out of fear, but not out of unselfish love [9]."
Most Arminians I have known would also agree with that. -- that part of the discussion is a point in common.
From your link
" The doctrine of unconditional election means God does not base his choice (election) of certain individuals on anything other than his own good will [13]. God chooses whomever he pleases and passes over the rest. The ones God chooses will desire to come to him, will accept his offer of salvation, and will do so precisely because he has chosen them.
"To show that God positively chooses, rather than merely foresees, those who will come to him, Calvinists cite passages such as
Romans 9:15-18, which says, “[The Lord] says to Moses, ‘I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion.’ So it depends not upon man’s will or exertion, but upon God’s mercy…. So then he has mercy upon whomever he wills, and he hardens the heart of whomever he wills [14].”
I have heard Arminians refer to that as "arbitrary selection" - an alternate name for it - and they do not agree because of John 3:15, 1 John 2:2 and Rom 2:11
from your link
"Although a Catholic may agree with unconditional election, he may not affirm “double-predestination,” a doctrine Calvinists often infer from it. This teaching claims that in addition to electing some people to salvation God also sends others to damnation.
"The alternative to double-predestination is to say that while God predestines some people, he simply passes over the remainder. They will not come to God, but it is because of their inherent sin, not because God damns them. This is the doctrine of passive reprobation, which Aquinas taught [16].
as someone else here already noted - once it is admitted that single predestination leaves all who are not predestined - doomed to hell - then no such thing as "double predestination" because it is just a consequence of single predestination.
from our link
"Calvinists believe the atonement is limited, that Christ offered it for some men but not for all. They claim Christ died only for the elect. To prove this they cite verses which say Christ died for his sheep (
John 10:11), for his friends (
John 15:13-14a), and for the Church (
Acts 20:28,
Eph. 5:25) [18]. One cannot use these verses to prove Christ died only for the elect.
Most Arminians would agree with your link on that point.
from your link
"
Irresistible Grace
"Calvinists teach that when God gives a person the grace that enables him to come to salvation, the person always responds and never rejects this grace. For this reason many have called this the doctrine of irresistible grace.
"This designation has the drawback of making it sound as though God forces people against their will to come to him (like a policeman shouting, “Resistance is useless! Throw down your weapons and surrender!”) The designation also sounds unbiblical, since Scripture indicates grace can be resisted. In
Acts 7:51 Stephen tells the Sanhedrin, “You always resist the Holy Spirit!” [27]
Most Arminians would agree with your link on that point.
from your link
"Perseverance of the saints
"Calvinists teach that if a person enters a state of grace he never will leave it but will persevere to the end of life. This doctrine is normally called the perseverance of the saints. [33] All those who are at any time saints (in a state of sanctifying grace, to use Catholic terminology) will remain so forever. No matter what trials they face, they will always persevere, so their salvation is eternally secure. [34]
Analogies are used to support this teaching. Calvinists point out that when we become Christians we become God’s children. They infer that, just as a child’s position in the family is secure, our position in God’s family is secure. A father would not kick his son out, so God will not kick us out.
This reasoning is faulty. The analogy does not prove what it is supposed to. Children do not have “eternal security” in their families. First, they can be disowned. Second, even if a father would not kick anyone out, a child can leave the house on his own, disown his parents, and sever all ties with the family. Third, children can die; we, as God’s children, can die spiritual deaths after we have been spiritually “born again.” [35]
Most Arminians would agree with your link on that point.
from your link -
Calvinists also use Bible passages to teach
perseverance of the saints. The chief ones are
John 6:37-39,
10:27-29, and
Romans 8:35-39. The Calvinist interpretation of these passages takes them out of context [36], and there are numerous other exegetical problems with their interpretation. [37]
...the fact that a person will come to God does not of itself mean he will stay with God. If one is talking about predestination to final salvation, then a predestined person will stay with God, but this does not mean the predestined are the only ones who experience initial salvation. Some might genuinely come to God (because they were predestined to initial salvation) and then genuinely leave (because they were not predestined to final salvation). [39] Either way, predestination to initial salvation does not entail predestination to final salvation. [40] There is no reason why a person cannot be predestined to “believe for a while” but “in time of temptation fall away” (
Luke 8:13). [41]
Your link mixes predestination with perseverance - - But Arminians would agree with this much of that link - "Some might genuinely come to God ... and then genuinely leave"