Prove scientifically that the Theory of Evolution is invalid.
The Cambrian Explosion (CE) disproves the Theory of Evolution (ToE) in one fell swoop, for the following reasons:
1. ToE predicts that any multicellular organism will be preceded by evolutionary ancestors. However, all of the animals that appeared during the CE did so fully-formed, with no evidence of evolutionary links to ancestors.
There is fossil evidence of pre-Cambian life forms, but there exists no fossil evidence of evolutionary links between them and the Cambrian biota. To make matters worse (for ToE), fossil evidence suggests that the Ediacaran biota that preceded the Cambrian suffered a mass extinction.
Likewise, there is no evidence of evolutionary links between the "small, shelly fauna" (that appeared after the Ediacaran biota and at the very beginning of the Cambrian) and the explosion of animal forms that appeared later in the Cambrian.
2. ToE predicts diversity followed much later by disparity. However, the CE reveals the opposite happened - disparity first, followed by diversity.
3. ToE predicts that all life on earth will form a single "tree" of common descent, so all Phyla will be connected by phylogenic "branches". However, the many Phyla that appeared during the CE don't form anything that even comes close a single tree of common descent. On the contrary, the CE Phyla form what could be described as an "orchard" - many separate trees that are not connected by any phylogenic branches whatsoever.
4. ToE predicts a never-ending expansion of new animal Phyla, but all the known animal Phyla (except one) appeared during the CE.
"Three billion years of unicellularity, followed by five million years of intense creativity and then capped by more than 500 million years of variation on set anatomical themes can scarcely be read as a predictable, inexorable or continuous trend toward progress or increasing complexity." Gould S.J., "The Evolution of Life on the Earth," Scientific American, Vol. 271, No. 4, October 1994, p.67
"The seemingly sudden appearance of skeletonized life has been one of the most perplexing puzzles of the fossil record. How is it that animals as complex as trilobites and brachiopods could spring forth so suddenly, completely formed, without a trace of their ancestors in the underlying strata? If ever there was evidence suggesting Divine Creation, surely the Precambrian and Cambrian transition, known from numerous localities across the face of the earth, is it. " (Peter Douglas Ward. 1992. On Methuselah's Trail: Living fossils and the Great Extinctions. p. 29)
Please don’t say that there are no transitional fossils. Many have been discovered.
Oh, you mean like Archaeopteryx - the "transitional fossil" that supposedly links dinosaurs to birds? Evidently, to be a paleontologist, the first prerequisite is to possess a very vivid imagination!
I've learnt to take "transitional fossil" claims with a very large grain of salt, because evolution science is crawling with deluded dreamers, story-tellers, myth-makers and con-men.
My understanding is that the fossil record lacks transitional fossils between Phyla, which represents a big problem for ToE.
Don’t say there are gaps. Whenever a transitional fossil is found more gaps are created.
S. J. Gould wrote that, in light of the fossil record, Darwin's theory of gradualism is an "embarrassment" (The Panda's Thumb, p.. That says it all, really.
If you are correct that evolution creates atheists then why do so many people like me believe in G-d and accept evolution?
Because they're naive, gullible and deceived victims of the biggest con-job in the history of science. They think all those scientists can't possibly be wrong (herd instinct) and that scientists are incapable of bias, flights of fantasy or deceit.
It all depends on your understanding of Genesis.
I don't need Genesis to recognize the Theory of Evolution as junk science.
