What media and politicians will be sued by Rittehouse?

[Pavel Mosko]

Kyle Rittenhouse stands to win law suits for defamation, libel, slander etc. much like Nicholas Sandman (The famous "Covington Kid"), did a year or two ago.

Who do you think will be sued? By the way this might include Joe Biden and the White House because Biden called him something like a "White Supremacist" a week or two ago. (I discuss in my 2nd post that Biden can be sued in spite of his Constitutional protections).

 

[hislegacy]

Joe cannot be sued.

Most other Congress members will never be aired either
BUT. I suspect a number of media organizations will be ponying up some serious dollars like they had to for Sandman.

 

[Pavel Mosko]

Joe cannot be sued.

The Constitution protects him from stuff while in office to keep his role as Chief Executive for the country secure, but does not grant him permanent and full immunity.

He is still libel for the stuff he does in office. Besides that there is the Paula Jones case against Clinton etc. where certain kinds of exceptions can be granted.

I'm pretty sure, law suits can be filed to take effect when his immunity ends, so as not to be affected by things like statutes of limitations etc.


Joe's first statement on Rittenhouse was a Tweet remark about him being a White Supremacist back when he was a candidate. So no official protections then...

 

[timothyu]

Does being acquitted of all counts and found not guilty by self defence mean the protestors weren't as peace loving as they claimed.. self defence being the key phrase? Will the damaged property and stolen goods feel vindicated? Will the title of troublemaker remain fluid? But regardless of what the courts proclaims the divisiveness of the people will remain. The age of the Hatfields and McCoys has returned. Will the good name and character of the protestors be marred by the police records of the three who were shot?

 

[hislegacy]

They can bring out 500 Nation Guardsmen to keep peace after the trial - if they had done that during the riots - the trail would not have ever happened.

Think maybe government officials will learn from it?

Better to be proactive than reactive.

 

[timothyu]

Better to be proactive than reactive.

I thought there were protestors protesting the intervention of the government with security forces.

 

[JimR-OCDS]

Kyle Rittenhouse stands to win law suits for defamation, libel, slander etc. much like Nicholas Sandman (The famous "Covington Kid"), did a year or two ago.

Who do you think will be sued? By the way this might include Joe Biden and the White House because Biden called him something like a "White Supremacist" a week or two ago. (I discuss in my 2nd post that Biden can be sued in spite of his Constitutional protections).

I think there is a difference on what the media reported on Sandman and Rittenhouse.
In the Sandman incident, the media literally fabricated what took place and used
Sandman's photo with the headline that he was mocking the Native American.

In the Rittenhouse case, the media merely reported the information that was released
by law enforcement and what the reporters at the time saw.

 

[Pavel Mosko]

I think there is a difference on what the media reported on Sandman and Rittenhouse.
In the Sandman incident, the media literally fabricated what took place and used
Sandman's photo with the headline that he was mocking the Native American.

In the Rittenhouse case, the media merely reported the information that was released
by law enforcement and what the reporters at the time saw.

I can kind of see that, but also disagree too. I think this Ana Kasparian retraction from a few weeks ago is noteworthy. For some reason she got the notion that Rittenhouse was the aggressor etc. you got to ask how somebody in the media, even alternative media could have gotten that kind of idea...?

I guess much of the blame goes with the prosecutor who filed his case 48 hours after the events etc. but this is not the 1st time there has been a malicious prosecution by a liberal DA.

 

[JimR-OCDS]

I can kind of see that, but also disagree too. I think this Ana Kasparian retraction from a few weeks ago is noteworthy. For some reason she got the notion that Rittenhouse was the aggressor etc. you got to ask how somebody in the media, even alternative media could have gotten that kind of idea...

I guess much of the blame goes with the prosecutor who filed his case 48 hours after the events etc. but this is not the 1st time there has been a malicious prosecution by a liberal DA.

Alternative media I think is the key here. She wasn't in the mainstream media like the
Washington Post and New York Times. The post fabricated the Sandman incident and
other main stream news source ran with what they reported. It's why he won.

In the case of Rittenhouse, the main stream media merely provided what was released
by law enforcement and what came about in the trial. They didn't fabricate the story,
but did give information which was not accurate, but what was known at the time it was
reported.

 

[Pavel Mosko]

Alternative media I think is the key here. She wasn't in the mainstream media like the
Washington Post and New York Times. The post fabricated the Sandman incident and
other main stream news source ran with what they reported. It's why he won.

In the case of Rittenhouse, the main stream media merely provided what was released
by law enforcement and what came about in the trial. They didn't fabricate the story,
but did give information which was not accurate, but what was known at the time it was
reported.

But some of the other mainstream TV news was just focusing on the prosecutors presentation which was very slanted to the say the least even for a prosecution, attempting to paint Kyle as the aggressor compared to Rosenbaum etc. It really goes against the popular saying "There is two sides to every story", some of these TV channels seem to have their mind made up on him being guilty as much as the prosecuting attorney and liberal politicians.

 

[JimR-OCDS]

But some of the other mainstream TV news was just focusing on the prosecutors presentation which was very slanted to the say the least even for a prosecution, attempting to paint Kyle as the aggressor compared to Rosenbaum etc. It really goes against the popular saying "There is two sides to every story", some of these TV channels seem to have their mind made up on him being guilty as much as the prosecuting attorney and liberal politicians.

They merely reported what the prosecution was stating, not fabricating what actually took place as in the Sandman case.

 

[LeGato]

Kyle Rittenhouse stands to win law suits for defamation, libel, slander etc. much like Nicholas Sandman (The famous "Covington Kid"), did a year or two ago.

Who do you think will be sued? By the way this might include Joe Biden and the White House because Biden called him something like a "White Supremacist" a week or two ago. (I discuss in my 2nd post that Biden can be sued in spite of his Constitutional protections).

LOL, CNN pretending like they didn't know how much they were sued for by Sandman.

As far as Kyle goes, why not sue Antifa, Soros, and BLM while he's at it?

 

[LeGato]

Does being acquitted of all counts and found not guilty by self defence mean the protestors weren't as peace loving as they claimed.. self defence being the key phrase? Will the damaged property and stolen goods feel vindicated? Will the title of troublemaker remain fluid? But regardless of what the courts proclaims the divisiveness of the people will remain. The age of the Hatfields and McCoys has returned. Will the good name and character of the protestors be marred by the police records of the three who were shot?

The age of the Hatfields and McCoys has returned.

We can thank the media for this division.

 

[LeGato]

I can kind of see that, but also disagree too. I think this Ana Kasparian retraction from a few weeks ago is noteworthy. For some reason she got the notion that Rittenhouse was the aggressor etc. you got to ask how somebody in the media, even alternative media could have gotten that kind of idea...?

I guess much of the blame goes with the prosecutor who filed his case 48 hours after the events etc. but this is not the 1st time there has been a malicious prosecution by a liberal DA.

How old is this video?

 

[Pavel Mosko]

How old is this video?

The Fox video was early January of 2020, while the event itself happened I thought around the spring of 2018 or so.

 

[iarwain]

The Constitution protects him from stuff while in office to keep his role as Chief Executive for the country secure, but does not grant him permanent and full immunity.

Funny how Biden is protected, when he arguably made one of the most damaging, groundless, and unsubstantiated remarks about Rittenhouse, considering he was a presidential candidate at the time. Apparently it's okay to try to destroy a normal US citizen's life (and a minor to boot) if you're a member of the elite, but don't try to sue the president.

 

[Pavel Mosko]

OK I think Rittenhouse has some chances against MSNBC based on this Fox News video.

Kaylee says Biden actually put Rittenhouse face in one of his political adds...

Joy Reid has done a number of inflammatory stuff on Rittenhouse, especially in regards to his race. I suspect a lot of stuff fits under "opinion" journalism but a lot of it really seems to fit hate speech (She is venting animosity at him, Brent Kavanaugh etc. for having some kind of special privilege based on race).

 

[Michie]

Kyle Rittenhouse stands to win law suits for defamation, libel, slander etc. much like Nicholas Sandman (The famous "Covington Kid"), did a year or two ago.

Who do you think will be sued? By the way this might include Joe Biden and the White House because Biden called him something like a "White Supremacist" a week or two ago. (I discuss in my 2nd post that Biden can be sued in spite of his Constitutional protections).

I just heard that Biden smearing him as a white supremacist was done while he was campaigning and trying to stir up votes. So it is something Rittenhouse can sue over since he was not a sitting president at the time.

 

[iarwain]

I hope Rittenhouse sues MSNBC and others and wins a huge bundle.
I have never seen aspects of the mainstream media so dedicated to selling a lie, and their motivation is baffling to me, frankly. The only conclusion I can draw is that they want to destroy our right to self defense, to accomplish their Marxist ends.

 

[timothyu]

If anything the media may have had their feathers ruffled as their position of judge and jury where they pass judgement on everything before it hits the courts, has been threatened. In Canada now, the media will go about condemning based on whatever their agenda of the day is, but by law must follow it up now by say the accusations have not been tested in a court of law.