Well, as the Director of the CDC, perhaps she could actually analyze the data and conduct actual studies. RCTs of masking. You know, actual science that isn't politicized and/or based on popular opinion.
Perhaps she could explain why she's advocated for an EUA for vaccination for children when children actually have a higher risk of dying from suicide than they do from COVID. Did you know that somewhere around 300 children under the age of 18 have had COVID associated deaths since the pandemic began? So the risk of an adverse event from vaccination must be almost non-existent to justify vaccinating children, where COVID has NOT proven to be a high risk to them at all. There are roughly 75 million children in the United States. If all of them are vaccinated and there is an adverse event rate of only 0.001%, more than double the number of kids would be harmed than if they hadn't been vaccinated at all.
Or maybe she could explain why back on February 3,
she said that schools could safely reopen without vaccinating teachers, but now she thinks every man, woman, child and baby on the planet needs a vaccination. From the article, Dr. Walensky is quoted;
"There is increasing data to suggest that schools can safely reopen and that safe reopening does not suggest that teachers need to be vaccinated,” CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky told reporters during a White House news briefing on Covid-19.
“Vaccinations of teachers is not a prerequisite for safely reopening schools,” she added.
Of course, she had to backtrack when the Biden administration threw her under the bus and then came out with ridiculously restrictive "guidance" for school openings that would have kept 90%+ of schools closed, in direct opposition to what she had just said days earlier. Jake Tapper at CNN called her on this. Just watch her flop around like a fish trying to come up with a cohesive answer to simple questions about the science;
Or maybe she could explain why there is no consideration of natural herd immunity when speaking of "safety". Studies have shown that if you've had COVID, you have as much immunity as if you got the vaccine. "But we don't know how long that immunity lasts!" The same is true of the vaccine. I mean, they're already saying you're going to need a booster shot in just 6 months. Of course, it was the CEO of Pfizer that said that, but I'm sure his motives are completely altruistic, pure and holy and not at all related to the fact that he stands to profit immensely from convincing people they need his product every 6 months to be "safe".
This woman isn't behaving as a leader and advocate of public health. She is behaving as a politician. It's astounding to me as people watch her never-ending flip-flops that they still think she's doing the best she can.