Let me give this another try.
a) Primitive life surviving the hostile environment of early Earth and progressing to higher form implies the involvement of an intelligent mind.
Flapdoodle.
b) The primitive bacteria, presumably unisex, split into complex male and female species with the instinct to live together and multiply shows the involvement of an intelligent mind.
Sex did not come from bacteria. First cells started forming into clumps that developed a life of their own independent of the cells. Some cells broke off to form new clumps. One type of clump came upon the novelty of sharing parts of the genome with neighbors. This gave them a huge survival advantage, in that a beneficial mutation could now spread to all future members of the species. The cells that left one clump with half the genome became known as sperm, and those that stayed with the source became known as the egg.
c) Physical beings having metaphysical properties like life, instinct to protect their children, consciousness, free will etc. of humans shows the involvement of an intelligent mind.
Why could not survival of the fittest preserve those children that were protected by their parents? Why can not survival of the fittest preserve those who were aware of the self and the needs of the self?
And you speak of free will. What free will? It is the molecules of the brain that make our decisions.
if you are still not convinced, out of curiosity, what would it take you to believe Intelligent Design? If there is nothing - even in theory - that can convince you about the the involvement of an intelligent mind, I am not going to waste anyone's time.
Again, I used to be a Creationist. I argued long and hard for creation. But I was persuaded first by the evidence for an old earth, then for the evidence of the progression of species through millions of years, and then by the seeming randomness of the changes.
So you will get nowhere by arguing that it was my lack of a motive in proving creation that caused me to view things differently.
Do you or do you not accept that evolution happened? If you do not accept evolution, I don't see how you can understand well enough to understand the workings of an intelligent designer. But if you do believe in evolution, then we are left with a discussion of theistic evolution vs atheistic evolution. Where are you at? It would help if you told me so I could adjust my responses to what you are saying.
Origin of life is arguably the most complex event known to humans. It is so complex that some scholars believe the early forms of life like Amino acids or Protein molecule came from outer space. The life originated at the time when Earth was hostile to living forms, with harmful radiations, devastating tornadoes, earthquakes etc. For most part of Earth's existence, Moon's gravitational field caused frequent tsunami's. Yet, the primitive life not only thrived but it advanced to more complex forms. Doesn't this prove the involvement of an intelligent mind?
This thread is not about the origin of life. It is about human evolution. Do you or do you not agree with the main thesis of this thread? Why change the subject?
..an object cannot escape a universal cause unless it is acted upon by an external agent so, the order in the diversification of life posits (pre) design because it is the disorder that increases with time.
...in a closed system. You left out the last part of the second law of your statement of the second law.