Don't talk bad things about Catholics nor homosexuals

[lambofgod43985889]

The fact cousin marriages sometimes arent considered incest shows that terms like incest and homosexuality have connotations of things that are part of peoples sinful nature and arent morally acceptable or justifiable.

They need the full force of love over them.

 

[Sammy-San]

They need the full force of love over them.

Do you agree that the liberal position on this is a total self contradiction?

 

[lambofgod43985889]

Do you agree that the liberal position on this is a total self contradiction?

What are your worries, I'll read you.

 

[RushMAN]

Since its between the person and God it shouldnt be the focus of the discussion.

I think you all maybe on the more liberal side, as for me I take the conservative side of Christianity and I am not trying to be mean here. I am leaving the thread I think that is best

 

[SkyWriting]

I meant that the idea of a man looking like a woman or vice versa is sexually inappropriate behavior, as well as it sends the message that God makes mistakes.

My grandson is nine, wears a diaper, and says only one word.."Baaa".
So I don't think God will be confused with the wrong length of hair thinking
He made a mistake. A friend of my was born with Cancer of the spine
and after surgery, she was a quadriplegic. She used an electric wheelchair
for the rest of her life and her hair was long, but then she kept it very short later.
One arm was pretty useless but she still did her nails on that hand. She did that
so people wouldn't think God makes mistakes.

 

[Sammy-San]

I think you all maybe on the more liberal side, as for me I take the conservative side of Christianity and I am not trying to be mean here. I am leaving the thread I think that is best

We shouldnt focus on peoples sins excessively especially sins that are between people and God.

 

[Kenny'sID]

Philosophical because we think about ideological issues, finding which is the correct answer.

Ethical because is not good be rude with the others.

Isn't God himself pretty rude when it comes to homosexuals? I mean calling them an abomination and all?

And don't get me wrong, I'm not going to go out of my way to be rude to them, not as a general rule anyway.

 

[DamianWarS]

Love them so you won't hurt them. Lgbt community needs true love.

are these perhaps introspective? what is your history with how you treat Catholics and homosexuals?

 

[Cormack]

Nope. Online is more or as fake as a soap opera. You see online most people are really anonymous and a majority of people don't act in real life like they do online. The lie is online is real, the truth is online is fake.

Lots of fakery online, even the “real” people we know are fake online. Relationship “experts” who can’t manage their own love life, couples posting photos from paradise as if they’re living in secure luxury (while neck deep in debt,) gym rats who only take photos after a lift session so they’ll have maximum pump Don’t lie bro, I know you not that jacked!

Gayness goes hand in hand with being offended because homosexual sex is shameful. When people are ashamed of their behaviour they’re always going to be defensive, even lashing out at gentle correction as if it were something more.

Yes there are legit acts of hatred against people who are same sex attracted (and legit acts of hatred against Catholics,) but those actions are such an obvious minority behaviour that to put a spotlight on them quickly turns into a witch-hunt.

If as a Christian you feel real hatred in your heart for anyone, then that person has some level of power over you, leaving that power in the hands of the Father is safer.

Men who have sex with men should learn that their tender sensibilities don’t trump the Christians intention, if a Christian says something against the gay lifestyle (intending it in love) then responding with outrage is self-centred and insincere.

On topic: Based on the level of reply I suspect this topic is a massive troll Sorry if I’m mistaken.

 

[Blade]

Its ok... I understand what your trying to say.. not the best way to word it but.. Christ came to this world became His creation and took mans place. He does not judge you nor condemn you. He didn't come for the righteous but for the sinner to repent. That has not changed. No matter what the sin.. He will not condemn.. oh you will feel no greater love. But.. at some point.. you/me will have to repent turn away from our sin believe in Him to get in.

And we were given all authority over the enemy. We were not given authority power over man. So.. what are you doing? What He started He will finish. As David said.. against thee and only thee do I sin and do this evil in your sight. Maybe love forgive those that don't speak they way you wish they would? Show them.. be the example. We can't change anyone.. only He does. Only HE saves.

 

[The Barbarian]

The Catholic Church regards homosexuality as unacceptable behavior. And only some Protestant denominations accept homosexuality. So it's kind of an odd OP.

 

[JohnDB]

When the USA was being founded the Founding Fathers wanted to be a convention of various Protestant groups and acting in a unified stance to govern themselves. A collection of theocracies if you will.
The thought of unbelievers or atheists living amongst the Christians was that they wouldn't live long as those ideals were considered illegal in most states. (There were only 13 at the time) The witch trials in Salem Massachusetts are an example of such thoughts. The trials were poorly performed but they did express the sentiments of the people that Non-Christian beliefs weren't going to be tolerated and received a capital punishment.
Now by the time the Louisiana Purchase was made and the inclusion of California, the Catholic Church was included. New York had already several Catholic monasteries that were producing wines and vineyards and even some glass works. Granted they weren't without some prejudice against their theology but then again every theological group was prejudiced against other groups.
The Virginia Baptists firmly believed that the Pennsylvania Dutchman were going to hell for their beliefs.
When Thomas Jefferson wrote his famous letter about "wall of separation between Church and State" many take this as theological bodies and governmental bodies but in truth it was actually a separation of federal government versus state government and that the role of the Federal Government wasn't going to tell Virginia Baptists how to craft their laws even if they were quite harsh. They could treat the occupants of their state as they pleased. If they whipped every non-baptist to the border of their state/church then that was up to them. (Which was the complaint that caused the writing of Thomas Jefferson's famous letter)

So today we have a group of people in America who identify themselves by a sexual sin. And want to sponge off of the blessings that God has granted the Christian nation.
And now they are crying about "hurt feelings"?
Sorry....

 

[JacksBratt]

Love them so you won't hurt them. Lgbt community needs true love.

We are told that we should not talk bad about anyone.

 

[renniks]

Yes. it does.

That's absurd. It would mean to love a murderer I would have to agree to let them murder people.

 

[Maria Billingsley]

Nonetheless we adore Jesus only, and I am a Saint too by the blood of Jesus. Dead saint won't help us to sanctify ourselves, only god

Now you didi it. You just went against a Catholic belief. So maybe use this platform to practice what you preach. Though you just contradict (and further down the thread caused a Carholic to respond negatively, ) could there have been a better way to represent your case? Be blessed.

 

[Archivist]

When the USA was being founded the Founding Fathers wanted to be a convention of various Protestant groups and acting in a unified stance to govern themselves. A collection of theocracies if you will.
The thought of unbelievers or atheists living amongst the Christians was that they wouldn't live long as those ideals were considered illegal in most states. (There were only 13 at the time) The witch trials in Salem Massachusetts are an example of such thoughts. The trials were poorly performed but they did express the sentiments of the people that Non-Christian beliefs weren't going to be tolerated and received a capital punishment.
Now by the time the Louisiana Purchase was made and the inclusion of California, the Catholic Church was included. New York had already several Catholic monasteries that were producing wines and vineyards and even some glass works. Granted they weren't without some prejudice against their theology but then again every theological group was prejudiced against other groups.
The Virginia Baptists firmly believed that the Pennsylvania Dutchman were going to hell for their beliefs.
When Thomas Jefferson wrote his famous letter about "wall of separation between Church and State" many take this as theological bodies and governmental bodies but in truth it was actually a separation of federal government versus state government and that the role of the Federal Government wasn't going to tell Virginia Baptists how to craft their laws even if they were quite harsh. They could treat the occupants of their state as they pleased. If they whipped every non-baptist to the border of their state/church then that was up to them. (Which was the complaint that caused the writing of Thomas Jefferson's famous letter)

So today we have a group of people in America who identify themselves by a sexual sin. And want to sponge off of the blessings that God has granted the Christian nation.
And now they are crying about "hurt feelings"?
Sorry....

Except Maryland was founded by Lord Baltimore as a Catholic colony and had a large Catholic population.

The witchcraft trials--and they were held throughout the American colonies--often had a non-religious basis. You wanted your neighbor's property, just claim that he or she was a witch.

 

[chevyontheriver]

Except Maryland was founded by Lord Baltimore as a Catholic colony and had a large Catholic population.

But they made the mistake of tolerating other beliefs so eventually the others dominated and persecuted Catholics even in Maryland when they became the majority.

 

[The Barbarian]

When the USA was being founded the Founding Fathers wanted to be a convention of various Protestant groups and acting in a unified stance to govern themselves. A collection of theocracies if you will.

Beating back the effort to impose religious taxes in a sometimes bitter legislative battle, the triumphant Madison was able to have Jefferson’s Statute adopted, one of the great successes of Jefferson’s life. Jefferson reported triumphantly that the legislative effort to insert “Jesus Christ” in the preamble to the Virginia Statute was defeated, establishing that religious freedom was “meant to comprehend, within the mantle of it’s protection, the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and Mahometan, the Hindoo and infidel of every denomination.”
Thomas Jefferson and Religious Freedom | Thomas Jefferson's Monticello

I don't doubt that there were those who wanted to impose theocracies on the new nation, but the Founders made it very sure that would not happen. As Madison wrote, they saw the results of that in the Old World and did not want to infect the New World with that disease.

Because experience witnesseth that ecclesiastical establishments, instead of maintaining the purity and efficacy of Religion, have had a contrary operation. During almost fifteen centuries has the legal establishment of Christianity been on trial. What have been its fruits? More or less in all places, pride and indolence in the Clergy, ignorance and servility in the laity, in both, superstition, bigotry and persecution.
Memorial and Remonstrance Against Religious Assessments - James Madison

 

[lambofgod43985889]

are these perhaps introspective? what is your history with how you treat Catholics and homosexuals?

From less to more love

 

[lambofgod43985889]

Now you didi it. You just went against a Catholic belief. So maybe use this platform to practice what you preach. Though you just contradict (and further down the thread caused a Carholic to respond negatively, ) could there have been a better way to represent your case? Be blessed.

I didn't hate anybody