dad said:
Well, actually for Him to
"have grabbed every individual atom at once and brought that component of their velocity to zero. " would be harder I think.
I was indicating that both scenarios would be infinitely easy for Him. If you dont agree then perhaps we have different understandings of Gods attributes.
Guys, theres no need to quibble about my use of the word grab, I was just using a common expression. Its not like I was suggesting he sprouted a few billion quadrillion tiny hands or something. If youd be happier if I substituted another word, such as influenced, consider it done.
dad said:
Also we need to fit the evidence. Why did no one on the planet notice it stopped spinning all of a sudden? How were the fundamental laws of physicas all overcome in the universe at once, such as what happened to the other planets we orbit in sync with? What about momentum, that would throw things off the planet if it screeched to a stop? Etc. You have far too many things to explain that could never be done unless the spiritual is involved.
God can dispense with any law of the universe as he sees fit.
Think about my response with your engineering hat on. Normally acceleration is accomplished by applying a force to a discreeet location on a body, and the transmission of that force through the body to each element of mass within the body causes stress. This stress is responsible for the physical sensations of acceleration and for the failure of parts.
If the force is distributed and applied directly to each element of mass of the body (in this case, the entire planet, everything on it and its atmosphere), there will be no transmission of the force from one element of mass to another, no stress within the body and thus no physical sensation. There will be no change in relative velocity between any affected element of mass and another, so nothing will slam into walls or fly into space.
The first sign of anything unusual would be the apparent lack of motion of the sun in the sky. It would be unnecessary to stop everything in the universe, and since the apparent motion of objects at cosmic distances is so slow no one at the time would have noticed whether or not those objects were affected anyway.
But if you prefer to think that he did it another way, that's fine too. I don't at all care how he did it, and if it turns out that the story is merely allegorical then I won't be disappointed. My only point in joining this thread was to evaluate the claim that a close pass by a planetary body could shift the earth's rotational axis and produce the observed result, and my professional opinion as a degreed mechanical engineer is that it's a lousy theory.