Who Goes To Hell?

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old.
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
28,578
6,064
EST
✟993,185.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Here's what you've never answered:
The "many" (v.19a) are not the "just". They are those who "were constituted sinners" (v.19a) "through one offense" (v.19a), i.e. Adam's sin. That "many" is, therefore, all mankind with the exception of Christ. Hence "many", not "all" mankind.
You assumptions are only assumptions they do not contradict what I posted.
If Paul didn't wish to parallel both occurrences of "THE MANY" in verse 19, then he would have said "some" or "few" instead of "THE MANY" in the second occurrence. Clearly he was teaching by the parallel of two occurrences of "THE MANY" (v.19) that all those who "were made sinners" will "be made righteous".
I did not know anyone was endowed with infinite knowledge and could unerringly decide what Paul should or should not have said in any given situation.
[Copy paste omitted]
[Copy paste omitted]
[Copy paste omitted]
[Copy paste omitted]

108. BDAG 250 (δικαίωσιν): "acquittal that brings life". The construction is variously called a "genitive of apposition", an "epexegetical genitive" or "genitive of purpose". Cf. BDF 92 (S166). The meaning is the same in each case: justification which brings life."
Previously addressed.
[Copy paste omitted]

"It is significant, and even astounding, that justification is here said to be world-embracing. Nothing is said about faith as a prerequisite for justification to be effective, nor about faith's accepting it." (Paul's Letter To The Romans: A Commentary, Arland J. Hultgren, Eerdmans, 2011, 804 pg, p.227, 229)[/QUOTE]
One commentary is not convincing.
δικαίωσις, εως, ἡ justification, vindication, acquittal (so Thu. et al.; Lev 24:22 and Sym. Ps 34:23; PsSol 3:3) as a process as well as its result διὰ τὴν δ. Ro 4:25 (s. DSharp, ET 39, 1928, 87–90). εἰς δ. ζωῆς acquittal that brings life 5:18.—DELG s.v. δίκη. TW. Spicq.
Arndt, W., Danker, F. W., Bauer, W., & Gingrich, F. W. (2000). A Greek-English lexicon of the New Testament and other early Christian literature (3rd ed., p. 250). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[Copy paste omitted]
All men are not - yet - in Christ. But 1 Cor.15 says:
22 For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive.
1 Cor.15:25 For He must reign until He has put all His enemies under His feet.
How many will be "under His feet"? Just enemies or all:
1 Cor.15:27 For “He has put in subjection all under His feet.” But when it may be said that all has been put in subjection, it is evident that the One having put in subjection all to Him is excepted.
So there is only one exception to "all" to be "put...under his feet". Then God will be "in" "all", hence universal salvation:
1 Cor.15:28 And when all shall be subjected unto him, then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him that put all under him, that God may be all in all.
1 Corinthians 15:25-28
25 For he must reign, till he hath put all enemies under his feet.
26 The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death.
27 For he hath put all things under his feet. But when he saith all things are put under him, it is manifest that he is excepted, which did put all things under him.
28 And when all things shall be subdued unto him, then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him that put all things under him, that God may be all in all.
So it is your opinion that the righteous and the enemies of God will be side by side under the feet of Jesus? Or is the "all things" vs. 27 the same "all enemies" vs. 25?
Would Paul say that all mankind is reconciled in Rom 5:18 then in 3 other epistles/books say that several groups of people have no inheritance in the kingdom of God?

1 Corinthians 6:9-10
Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,
10 Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.
Galatians 5:19-21
19 Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness,
20 Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies,
21 Envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God.
Ephesian 5:5 For this ye know, that no whoremonger, nor unclean person, nor covetous man, who is an idolater, hath any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God.
1 Corinthians 3:17 If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy; for the temple of God is holy, which temple ye are.

 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

FineLinen

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Jan 15, 2003
12,119
6,396
81
The Kingdom of His dear Son
✟528,512.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Yup.

Another favorite word of the Christ =

"This is why I speak to them in parables, because seeing they do not see, and hearing they do not hear, nor do they understand."

Your word for today =

Suniemi

8BfdUBBI9onyF9Ch2CJlmwqKFUDU7yruoyOhpVqwxA8UZqPp0xiuxZVGFUt5e67a0HQsGv1bdkLeWU5b6KREzCqs5l_Ok8PzDp_n-zylUDXe-6FcKX0qJguT_awUThvQwiugxVLdqhoggibbF4Saz4316DM
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Saint Steven
Upvote 0

Shrewd Manager

Through him, in all things, more than conquerors.
Site Supporter
Aug 16, 2019
4,167
4,081
Melbourne
✟364,409.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Listening to some more David Bentley Hart observations, he was saying that he's not an apologist for 'Christianity' as such, given that it has largely become treated as a 'system of salvation', driven by 'institutional imperatives', beginning from around the time of Constantine. The imperatives he's speaking of are the need for political and governmental (mind) control as a state religion. He describes the narrative that results in eternal punishment for the many as 'morally incoherent'.

It's saddening to find so many self-professed Christians willing to take their last stand in defence of the indefensible, to keep trying to draw water from broken cisterns, to claim the faith by their words yet deny it with their doctrine.

God will ensure that all peoples will overcome by the blood of the Lamb. That's the power of the covenant. So why not just have faith?
 
Upvote 0

ClementofA

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 10, 2016
5,459
2,197
Vancouver
✟310,073.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
I did not know anyone was endowed with infinite knowledge and could unerringly decide what Paul should or should not have said in any given situation.

Do you know anyone with common sense. Here's what you yourself said:

...
Did Paul teach that all men will be saved, regardless? These verses seem to say that.
* Romans 5:18 Therefore as by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life.
* Romans 5:19 For as by one man's disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous.
* 1 Timothy 2:4 Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth.
* 1 Timothy 4:10 For therefore we both labour and suffer reproach, because we trust in the living God, who is the Saviour of all men, specially of those that believe.

Thank you for your admission that there are Bible verses that seem to teach universalism ;


One commentary is not convincing.
δικαίωσις, εως, ἡ justification, vindication, acquittal (so Thu. et al.; Lev 24:22 and Sym. Ps 34:23; PsSol 3:3) as a process as well as its result διὰ τὴν δ. Ro 4:25 (s. DSharp, ET 39, 1928, 87–90). εἰς δ. ζωῆς acquittal that brings life 5:18.—DELG s.v. δίκη. TW. Spicq.
Arndt, W., Danker, F. W., Bauer, W., & Gingrich, F. W. (2000). A Greek-English lexicon of the New Testament and other early Christian literature (3rd ed., p. 250). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

When will that acquital that brings life to "all" (Rom.5:18) be realized. In the future (v.19):

Rom 5:18 Consequently, then, as it was through one offense for ALL MANKIND for condemnation, thus also it is through one just act for ALL MANKIND for life's justifying."

Rom 5:19 For even as, through the disobedience of the one man, THE MANY were constituted sinners, thus also, through the obedience of the One, THE MANY shall be constituted just."

To be testified in due time:

1 Tim.2:4 Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth. 5 For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; 6 Who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time.

1 Corinthians 15:25-28
25 For he must reign, till he hath put all enemies under his feet.
26 The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death.
27 For he hath put all things under his feet. But when he saith all things are put under him, it is manifest that he is excepted, which did put all things under him.
28 And when all things shall be subdued unto him, then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him that put all things under him, that God may be all in all.
So it is your opinion that the righteous and the enemies of God will be side by side under the feet of Jesus? Or is the "all things" vs. 27 the same "all enemies" vs. 25?

1 Cor.15:25 For He must reign until He has put all His enemies under His feet.

How many will be "under His feet"? Just enemies or all:

1 Cor.15:27 For “He has put in subjection all under His feet.” But when it may be said that all has been put in subjection, it is evident that the One having put in subjection all to Him is excepted.

So there is only one exception to "all" to be "put...under his feet". Then God will be "in" "all", hence universal salvation:

1 Cor.15:28 And when all shall be subjected unto him, then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him that put all under him, that God may be all in all.

God as "all in all" (1 Cor.15:28) has nothing to do with authority, but God "in" every being who ever lived. "To say that "all in all" signifies "the manifestation of God's supremacy"...is very far indeed from the truth...When we say "Christ is my all," what do we mean? That He is our Lord? Yes, and our Saviour and Friend and our Lover, our Wisdom and our Righteousness, and our Holiness--He is everything to us!...And that is just what God wishes to be and what He will be!...Will He be this only in some? No! He will be All in all!...we have said that when the last enemy [death] is abolished, then the Son abdicates and God becomes All in all. If there were still enmity we might imagine God being over all, but with all enmity gone, it is easy to see how He can become All in all...The "kingdom" is given up to the Father, after all sovereignty and authority and power have been abrogated. What kind of a "supremacy" will God "fully manifest" which has no power, no authority, no sovereignty? Thank God, all these elements, which characterized government during the eons, will be utterly unnecessary when the Son of God is finished with His "mediatorial" work. Instead of God's supremacy being fully manifested at that time, it will be entirely absent, and God, as Father, will guide His family by the sweet constraint of love."



 
Upvote 0

ClementofA

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 10, 2016
5,459
2,197
Vancouver
✟310,073.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Ecclesiastes 12:7 "Then shall the dust return to the earth as it was: and the spirit shall return unto God Who gave it."

Just so we know where the spirit goes. But since I confused you using the word Heaven (although we know Lazarus is there)

You think everyone who dies goes to God in heaven? And inside of God is Hades where the rich man was being tormented, or some such nonsense?

Let's just say to make things easier, when the spirit passes, there are are two sides which one can go and there's a gulf between them.

But you just quoted Ecc.12:7 that says they go to God. Do they go to God or to Hades or paradise or "two sides which one can go and there's a gulf between them" wherever that is supposed to be?


I assumed once again that you were familiar with the Luke passages, obviously not according to these words - "apparently Lazarus also is in Hades"

There is a fairly common view that Hades has two sections to it, one of torments & the other is paradise. On the cross Jesus said, today you will be with Me in paradise. Not in heaven. An internet search will reveal much info on this, for example the following random sample:

"Hades/Sheol is pictured as having two compartments in both the Old and New Testaments...The two compartment place where departed conscious spirits of the dead await judgment."

Hades: The conscious realm of the dead!


The point is one can't pass to the other side and vice versa. Are you missing that from this this teaching from Christ?

Not at all. It is perfectly harmonious with the teaching of scriptural universalism, as i've shown here:

Hell

I Peter 3:18 "For Christ also hath once suffered for sins, the Just for the unjust, that He might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh, but quickened by the Spirit:"
I Peter 3:19 "By which also He went and preached unto the spirits in prison,"


I Peter 3:20 "Which sometime were disobedient, when once the longsuffering for God waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water."

They are spirits, meaning they have passed on. The spirit goes back to God. As Christ teaches, there are two sides with a huge vacant interval that can't be passed.

So it's your view the "spirits in prison" have returned to God & this prison is in heaven? And that the rich man in Hades (Lk.16) was actually one of these "spirits in prison" in heaven while being in "hell" (Hades) at the same time? So you're trying to tell me that "hell" is in heaven, eh? Does that about sum up your doctrine? Hell is in heaven?

Again, easy verses to understand. Once Christ was quickened by the spirit, (something he made possible for us as well) and by that spirit preached unto the spirits in prison.

So now you're supporting an after death salvation opportunity for the unsaved and the wicked in this "hell" (Hades) which you say is in heaven?

There's nothing fanciful about that, just scripture. These aren't the fallen angels whose sin was much greater. These are people that were "sometimes" disobedient.

I don't see what it matters where Lazarus was as far as your claim is concerned. You tried to use the Luke 16 parable to support your claim that Satan was not among those in the heavens to be reconciled as per these verses:

Col.1:16 For by Him ***ALL*** was created that are in HEAVEN and that are on EARTH, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers. All was created through Him and for Him.
20 and by Him to reconcile ***ALL*** to Himself, by Him, whether on EARTH or in HEAVEN, having made peace through the blood of His cross.

You were, as far as i can tell, claiming those in the heavens who needed reconciling were human beings "in prison" in heaven. You failed to provide any scripturally cogent argument for such a position. You also ignored the passages i provided showing evil non human beings in the heavens.

There's nothing fanciful about that, just scripture. These aren't the fallen angels whose sin was much greater. These are people that were "sometimes" disobedient.

It looks more like some scripture plus some fanciful additions to it. Like assuming the rich man in torments in "hell" (Hades) was actually in heaven. And the "spirits in prison" Christ preached to were in a heavenly prison.

Yet it still ignores the fact of Satan being in the presence of God (Job 1-2) & God's intent to reconcile those in the heavens (Col.1:20), including the non human beings in heaven:

There are wicked spirits in heavenly places, but they are not humans:

Col.1:16 For by Him ***ALL*** was created that are in HEAVEN and that are on EARTH, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers. All was created through Him and for Him.
20 and by Him to reconcile ***ALL*** to Himself, by Him, whether on EARTH or in HEAVEN, having made peace through the blood of His cross.

Question: Where are the "principalities" and "powers" (v.16 above)?
Answer: They are "in heavenly places":

Eph. 3:8 To the intent that now unto the principalities and powers in heavenly places might be known by the church the manifold wisdom of God

Question: Who are the "principalities" and "powers" (v.16 above)?
Answer: They are wicked and not human:

Eph.6:12 For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this age, against spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places.

Now, with that knowledge, read Col.1:16, 20 again:

Col.1:16 For by Him ***ALL*** was created that are in HEAVEN and that are on EARTH, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers. All was created through Him and for Him.
20 and by Him to reconcile ***ALL*** to Himself, by Him, whether on EARTH or in HEAVEN, having made peace through the blood of His cross.

""I am aware of 'this pastor'. The verse which hit him like a ton of bricks as he wrestled with a congregant challenging him with Ultimate Reconciliation was the following;

COL 1:20 and through him to reconcile to himself all things, whether on earth or in heaven, making peace by the blood of his cross.

As he went through the doorway the Spirit of Truth challenged him saying; "What needs to be reconciled 'IN HEAVEN'?" After all, nothing in the heavenly realm needs reconciling but demons. :idea: Like the song says; "There is power power in the blood of Jesus." More power and a better plan, than the nominal church can even believe. To have ears to hear, one must loosen the death grip on what they believe."


If you can't see that the King of Tyre is Satan, I can't help you. He was created a cherub and in the garden of Eden.

Perhaps, then, when Jesus said to chop your offensive hands & feet off & pluck out your offensive eyes, you took that literally, too? How many body parts do you have left now?

When someone says of a human "he's an angel" do you take that literally, too.

Satan was a serpent in the garden of Eden, not a cherub. The only cherubs in the garden of Eden are referred to here & none of them is Satan:

Gen.3:24 yea, he casteth out the man, and causeth to dwell at the east of the garden of Eden the cherubs and the flame of the sword which is turning itself round to guard the way of the tree of life.

Satan was not a lowly king of a measly little place called Tyrus. He offered Jesus the kingdoms of the whole world!

And, again, Satan, a non physical spirit being cannot be turned into physical ashes (Ezek.28:19).


"Thou hast been in Eden the Garden of God; every precious stone was thy covering, the Sardis, topaz, and the diamond, the beryl, the onyx, and the jasper, the sapphire, the emerald, and the carbuncle, and gold: the workmanship of thy tabrets and thy pipes was prepared in thee in the day that thou wast created."

Again, "created", not born of woman here-a chereub.

Ezekiel 28:14 "Thou art the anointed cherub that covereth; and I have set thee so: thou wast upon the holy mountain of God; thou hast walked up and down in the midst of the stones of fire."

Ezekiel 28:15 "Thou wast perfect in thy ways from the day that thou wast created, till iniquity was found in thee."

God creates all beings (Psa.89:27; 102:18; Isa.43:7), including humans. So the word "created" can apply to humans like Ezek.28 says the king of Tyre is (v.2,9).

"Moreover, it is always well to inquire what is intended by "perfect" in the Scriptures. The Greek has three words for "perfect," and the Hebrew uses it for about six. It is questionable whether it ever denotes sinlessness. Any other meaning would be of little value in this discussion. The word used in Ezekiel 28:15 is tahmeem, meaning flawless. The A. V. renders it without blemish, complete, full, perfect, sincerely, sincerity, sound, without spot, undefiled, upright, uprightly, whole. It is most often found of the animals used in sacrifice. Noah was "perfect" (Gen.6:9) in his generations. This certainly does not mean that he was sinless. David said, "I was also upright perfect before Him." Does this prove that David escaped the lot of all of Adam's descendants up to this time? It is evident that the meaning is limited to apparent flaws, not to innate tendencies. It is not a question of sinlessness."

If you can't see that the King of Tyre is Satan, I can't help you. He was created a cherub and in the garden of Eden.

Then perhaps your excessive literality should also lead you to believe Pharoah was really a literal tree in the garden of Eden & a sea monster:

"Ezekiel himself is full of graphic, poetic images and metaphors (comparisons in which one thing is simply called another without “like” or “as”), one of which is a statement that Pharaoh was a tree in Eden, God’s garden (Ezek. 31:1-18; he is also a sea monster, 29:3-5)."

"...Yet another explanation is better than either the devil-interpretation or the Adam-interpretation: Ezekiel explicitly compares the ruler of Babylon to a cherub (28:14-15). Genesis calls neither Adam nor the serpent a cherub, but does refer explicitly to cherubim in the garden: God’s angels stationed there to keep Adam and Eve out after their fall (Gen. 3:24; cf. Ezek. 28:14-15 NIV: “guardian cherub”).

"...Having this in mind, when we read verses 11-19 we must understand that this is figurative language describing the former blessing of the king of Tyre when he was being faithful to God."

"...in Eden—The king of Tyre is represented in his former high state (contrasted with his subsequent downfall), under images drawn from the primeval man in Eden, the type of humanity in its most Godlike form."

"...vs. 14 uses the word "cherub", but it is still part of the poetical hyberbole of the comparison of the kings fall into pride and sin with the fall of Adam. This chapter is not about a fallen angel from heaven."

"...Yes, it is a metaphor. Many metaphors are indicated by the words "as", or "like". But when poetry is used, metaphors are to be understood as implied."

"...Indeed the text isn't clear there (whether he was the anointed cherub or with the anointed cherub"

"...When there is an inspired narrative that contains a significant portion of symbolism (as several biblical books do) and there is no specific historical connection within the immediate context, the conscientious Bible student must seek to determine, on the basis of a broader context, what the background of the text may be."

"In other words, he is not at liberty to extract, from his own imagination, an “interpretation” that is wholly alien to the historical text or that stands in contradiction to information found elsewhere in the scriptures."

"On the other hand, when the context specifically identifies the thrust of the symbolism, the issue is settled. And it is nothing short of exegetical criminality to substitute one’s personal “expository agenda” for that which the inspired author has stated explicitly."


If you are not in the book of life, you have not come to repentance. I guess we're not even allowed common sense on this thread but ok.

Evidently missing the point of my remark. Obviously "If you are not in the book of life, you have not come to repentance" - yet - but that doesn't mean you will never be added to the "book of life". Or deny that all people will eventually do so.

I had stated: "There's no Bible verse that says "Not all will come to repentance, since not all are written in the book of life." And the above remark was your reply.

There's no Bible verse that says "Not all will come to repentance, since not all are written in the book of life."

To the contrary:

Rom 5:18 Consequently, then, as it was through one offense for ALL MANKIND for condemnation, thus also it is through one just act for ALL MANKIND for life's justifying."

Rom 5:19 For even as, through the disobedience of the one man, THE MANY were constituted sinners, thus also, through the obedience of the One, THE MANY shall be constituted just."

1 Cor.15:22 AS in Adam ALL die SO ALSO in Christ shall ALL be made alive.

1 Cor.15:28 And when ALL shall be subdued unto him, then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him that put ALL under him, that God may be all in ALL.


"through the obedience of the One" again there's the conditon.

It's a condition that has been fulfilled! You know, Christ's obedience unto death on the cross after living a perfectly obedient life.

My husband says I must pull myself from this thread lol. And he's probably right.

Bon voyage!
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old.
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
28,578
6,064
EST
✟993,185.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Listening to some more David Bentley Hart observations, he was saying that he's not an apologist for 'Christianity' as such, given that it has largely become treated as a 'system of salvation', driven by 'institutional imperatives', beginning from around the time of Constantine. The imperatives he's speaking of are the need for political and governmental (mind) control as a state religion. He describes the narrative that results in eternal punishment for the many as 'morally incoherent'.
It's saddening to find so many self-professed Christians willing to take their last stand in defence of the indefensible, to keep trying to draw water from broken cisterns, to claim the faith by their words yet deny it with their doctrine.
God will ensure that all peoples will overcome by the blood of the Lamb. That's the power of the covenant. So why not just have faith?
You quote this anonymous person as if Moses carried his writings down from the mountain on stone tablets.
Before you try to reply I do not quote commentary, opinions from anonymous people. I quote standard reference works; lexicons, grammars, historical sources e.g. ECF, Talmud etc.
 
Upvote 0

ClementofA

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 10, 2016
5,459
2,197
Vancouver
✟310,073.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
You quote this anonymous person as if Moses carried his writings down from the mountain on stone tablets.

Anonymous? In light of the following thread, and your many posts in it, you should know who this scholar is:

A new New Testament translation by EO scholar DB Hart


Before you try to reply I do not quote commentary, opinions from anonymous people. I quote standard reference works; lexicons, grammars, historical sources e.g. ECF, Talmud etc.

About as often you quote your own fanciful pet theories without any support from anyone in the past 10,000 years.
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old.
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
28,578
6,064
EST
✟993,185.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
ClementofA said:
Anonymous? In light of the following thread, and your many posts in it, you should know who this scholar is:
A new New Testament translation by EO scholar DB Hart
About as often you quote your own fanciful pet theories without any support from anyone in the past 10,000 years.
My so-called "pet theories" seem to be supported by the unbiased translations of the JPS and the EOB. See e.g.
JPS Ecc 3:14
(14) I know that, whatsoever God doeth, it shall be for ever: [ עולם] nothing can be put to it, nor any thing taken from it: and God doeth it, that men should fear before him.
In this verse "olam" is described by the words "nothing can be put to it, nor any thing taken from it."
EOB John 6:58
(58) This is the bread that came down from heaven. Your ancestors ate manna and died, but whoever feeds on this bread will live forever.[αἰώνιος/aionios]
In this verse Jesus contrasts “aionios life” with “death.” If “live aionios” is only a finite period, it is not opposite “death.” Thus “aionios” by definition here means “eternal.”



 
Upvote 0

ClementofA

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 10, 2016
5,459
2,197
Vancouver
✟310,073.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
My so-called "pet theories" seem to be supported by the unbiased translations of the JPS and the EOB. See e.g.
JPS Ecc 3:14
(14) I know that, whatsoever God doeth, it shall be for ever: [ עולם] nothing can be put to it, nor any thing taken from it: and God doeth it, that men should fear before him.
In this verse "olam" is described by the words "nothing can be put to it, nor any thing taken from it."
EOB John 6:58
(58) This is the bread that came down from heaven. Your ancestors ate manna and died, but whoever feeds on this bread will live forever.[αἰώνιος/aionios]
In this verse Jesus contrasts “aionios life” with “death.” If “live aionios” is only a finite period, it is not opposite “death.” Thus “aionios” by definition here means “eternal.”



Seem to be? Where does EOB endorse your reasoning? Please provide a quote from the EOB translators stating that they agree with your reasoning or it is the basis behind their translation of aionios there. If you contacted them & they replied, i expect you'ld be in for an unpleasant awakening.

If Jesus wished to express endless punishment, then He would have used expressions such as "endless", "no end" & "never be saved" as per:

How Scripture expresses endless duration (not aion/ios) (paradise, hell, punishment) - Christianity -  - City-Data Forum

Jesus didn't use the best words & expressions to describe endlessness in regards to punishment, because He didn't believe in endless punishment.

ENDLESSNESS not applied to eschatological PUNISHMENT in Scripture:

could an 'eternal punishment' simply mean that once instituted it will not change?

12 points re forever and ever (literally to/into "the ages of the ages") being finite:

For the Lord will NOT cast off FOR EVER:
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old.
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
28,578
6,064
EST
✟993,185.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
ClementofA said:
Seem to be? Where does EOB endorse your reasoning? Please provide a quote from the EOB translators stating that they agree with your reasoning or it is the basis behind their translation of aionios there. If you contacted them & they replied, i expect you'ld be in for an unpleasant awakening.
The fact that the JPS consistently translates "olam" as eternal, for ever etc and the EOB consistently translates "ainios" as "eternal" is evidence enough that my conclusions are correct. If my conclusions were incorrect the native Hebrew and Greek speaking scholars would not translate the words the way they did.
If Jesus wished to express endless punishment, then He would have used expressions such as "endless", "no end" & "never be saved" as per:
Jesus didn't use the best words & expressions to describe endlessness in regards to punishment, because He didn't believe in endless punishment.
ENDLESSNESS not applied to eschatological PUNISHMENT in scripture
I was not aware that anyone was endowed with infinite knowledge and can authoritatively determine which words Jesus should/should not have used in any given situation 2000 years ago.

Links omitted
The unsupported opinions of anonymous people on other sites have no more validity than the scribblings on a public facility wall.
 
Upvote 0

ClementofA

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 10, 2016
5,459
2,197
Vancouver
✟310,073.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
The fact that the JPS consistently translates "olam" as eternal, for ever etc and the EOB consistently translates "ainios" as "eternal" is evidence enough that my conclusions are correct.

Irrelevant. I was referring to your "reasoning".

Also your theory that aion/ios/olam/ad are used in hyperbole wherever the words cannot possibly mean "forever" or the like. You haven't provided any support for this pet theory of yours from anyone, not a single scholar or amateur, in all of human history.

I was not aware that anyone was endowed with infinite knowledge and can authoritatively determine which words Jesus should/should not have used in any given situation 2000 years ago.

Irrelevant. Usage determines meaning. Aionios is often proven to be finite by many examples. Seldom, if ever, in Koine Greek does it indicate endlessness. Therefore it is a poor choice of a word if Jesus intended to use it to express endless punishment. He had multiple other clear & unambiguous words & expressions He could have used if it was His intention to warn about a future endless punishment.

If Jesus wished to express endless punishment, then He would have used expressions such as "endless", "no end" & "never be saved" as per:

How Scripture expresses endless duration (not aion/ios) (paradise, hell, punishment) - Christianity -  - City-Data Forum

Jesus didn't use the best words & expressions to describe endlessness in regards to punishment, because He didn't believe in endless punishment.

ENDLESSNESS not applied to eschatological PUNISHMENT in Scripture:

could an 'eternal punishment' simply mean that once instituted it will not change?

Nonsense! Unless you have a graduate degree in Greek you are not qualified to even speculate which word would or would not have been better in any situation.

No, usage determines meaning. Aionios is often proven to be finite by many examples. Seldom, if ever, in Koine Greek does it indicate endlessness. Therefore it is a poor choice of a word if Jesus intended to use it to express endless punishment. He had multiple other clear & unambiguous words & expressions He could have used if it was His intention to warn about a future endless punishment.

Furthermore, we see here how your own quotes support that:

● ④οὐ marker of reinforced negation, in combination w. μή, οὐ μή has the effect of strengthening the negation (Kühner-G. II 221–23; Schwyzer II 317; Mlt. 187–92 [a thorough treatment of NT usage]; B-D-F §365; RLudwig: D. prophet. Wort 31 ’37, 272–79; JLee, NovT 27, ’85, 18–23; B-D-F §365.—Pla., Hdt. et al. [Kühner-G. loc. cit.]; SIG 1042, 16; POxy 119, 5, 14f; 903, 16; PGM 5, 279; 13, 321; LXX; TestAbr A 8 p. 85, 11 [Stone p. 46]; JosAs 20:3; GrBar 1:7; ApcEsdr 2:7; Just., D. 141, 2). οὐ μή is the most decisive way of negativing something in the future.[1]
Arndt, W., Danker, F. W., Bauer, W., & Gingrich, F. W. (2000)A Greek-English lexicon of the New Testament and other early Christian Literature.(3rd Ed). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

If it's the "most decisive way of negating something in the future", why didn't God use it to say something like "unbelievers will never (ou me) be saved? You shot your own doctrine in the foot with that one.

● The combinations with οὐ μή also be noticed as, ουδεν οὐ μή (Lu. 10:19); οὐ μή se σε άνο ουδ ου σε εγκαταιπο (Heb. 13:5); ουκετι οὐ μή (Rev. 18:14). There is no denying the power of this accumulation of negatives. Cf. the English hymn "I'll never, no never, no never forsake."
Grammar Of The Greek New Testament In The Light Of Historical Research
By A. T. Robertson, M.A., D.D., Ll.D., Litt.D. p.1165.

Powerful negatives never used of the damnation of the lost.

I rest my case.


Savior of the World, or Eternal Failure?


The unsupported opinions of anonymous people on other sites have no more validity than the scribblings on a public facility wall.

Is that what you consider the writings of scholars, church fathers, etc? Good to know.
 
Upvote 0

JulieB67

Well-Known Member
Apr 21, 2020
1,585
731
56
Ohio US
✟150,017.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I know the universalim believers could care less about this post. It's for anyone else that might be posting or lurking or whatever that's still not sure on this subject.

Search and study the scriptures, not some man, not some video. The KJV can be translated back with the Strong's.

Psalms 118: 8 "It is better to trust in the Lord than put confidence in man"

I felt led to post a few more scriptures for anyone that might be here during my bible study today. (against my husband's wishes lol)

Luke 13:3 Christ's words- "I tell you, nay, but except that ye "repent", ye shall "all" likewise perish"

Right there, are you going to trust the Lord, or are you going to put your confidence in what some man says? One has to read the entire letter God has written to us and go from there.

If all were eventually saved, this would not be Christ's teaching. Do your own study of the word "perish". No matter what anyone says, that is the end at the second death. (Matthew 10 :28) And he's telling you that that's a chance you will perish. If that wasn't the case he would not have said it. If all were going to be saved (now I realize that these truly even believe that Satan will be saved, wow) why would Christ even preach this?

Satan is not one of those that was preached the gospel to. He knows the bible. In fact, he quoted scriptures from the OT to Christ (although he twisted it, which is what he does and what he'll doing during the end times). He knows the bible probably better than most Christians. To think he would even need to be preached to is hysterical.

To go a little further into what I was posting yesterday, again,

The spirit goes back to God. Christ can't make it any easier to understand with his teachings in Luke teachings. The rich man wanted Abraham to send Lazarus over but Abraham went on to tell him, there is a gulf, a vacant intervall that can not be passed. One side is where the overcomers are at this point, and the other side are those that have died and passed on that didn't overcome. It does matter where Lazarus is, he is in Abraham's bosom. Don't let anyone tell you differently. Just because this is considered hell at this point does not take away from Christ's teachings that this place is in the same realm as God. There is just a gulf. Again, are we going to believe the Lord or man?

Christ went to the the spirts that had passed on,

Here's a few more scriptures to nail down just who Christ went to,

I Peter 4:5 "Who shall give account to Him That is ready to judge the quick and the dead."

I Peter 4:6 "For this cause was the gospel preached also to them that are dead, that they might be judged according to men in the flesh, but live according to God in the spirit."

The living and the dead. He's giving the ones that had died before him a chance to hear the gospel that were sometimes disobedient. (1st Peter 3:20) (It was alot harder for them back in those days, we have Christ today) But they deserve to hear just like we do in the flesh (the quick -alive)

For the record, Satan and the fallen angels know the gospel lol. (they're constantly trying to do away with it for us in the flesh) And for the record, Satan and the fallen angels have not died yet.

This is Christ going to those that passed on before his work on the cross.

And let these words sink in - "was the gospel preached". Take those back to the Greek -it means to "announce good news". They haven't had a chance to receive it yet.

And let also these words sink in, -are dead, that they might be judged according to men in the flesh, but live according to God in the spirit."

They are dead, but the spirits are still alive. That's because no one has died the second death yet. So we see that these are the spirits that Christ taught to.


A do we honestly think that the gospel needs to be preached to Satan? The thought is so laughable. He's trying to destroy the gospel. He even tried to do so by tempting Christ himself. And again, he will deceive most of the world during the tribulation playing fake savior.

And Christ is just going "announce the good news to Satan and the fallen angel" about himself??? He's announcing the good news to the spirits (again, all souls/spirits are alive at this point) that are dead in the "flesh" Again, common sense needs to be applied.

And if the gospel was taught to Satan (which he knows very well lol) why is he coming back 2 more times to try and destroy it? Again, ridiculous. No one has an answer for that.

As Christians we are to have enmity between Satan and what he stands for. God put it there himself.

Gen 3:15 "I will put enmity between thee and thy woman, and between thy seed and her seed, it shall bruise they head, and thou shall bruise his heel." Enmity is hostility and hatred.

And for those that might be confused with who the serpent is in the garden of eden,

"Revelation 20:2 "And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years,"

Verses that prove Satan (with great wrath) is trying to destroy the gospel.

Revelation 12:12 "Therefore rejoice, ye heavens, and ye that dwell in them. Woe to the inhabiters of the earth and of the sea! for the devil is come down unto you, having great wrath, because he knoweth that he hath but a short time."

Revelation 12:13 "And when the dragon saw that he was cast unto the earth, he persecuted the woman which brought forth the man child."

Please don't let anyone lead you away from the fact that Satan wants to destroy the gospel.

We need to have the full armour to do battle against Satan in the end times if we are here at that time.

And yes, I definitely believe in wickedness in high places and that they are still in Heaven, Michael is holding them at this point (Rev12), and they will be back. I have never stated anything different.

But Christ taught the the gospel to the dead (but quickened alive, not one spirit has perished) The demons knew who Christ was and that he was the son of God before he even died. Satan has always known Christ is the savior of the world. They do not need the good news announced to them.










 
Last edited:
  • Friendly
Reactions: Saint Steven
Upvote 0

FineLinen

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Jan 15, 2003
12,119
6,396
81
The Kingdom of His dear Son
✟528,512.00
Faith
Non-Denom
But Christ taught the the gospel to the dead (but quickened alive, not one spirit has perished) The demons knew who Christ was and that he was the son of God before he even died. Satan has always known Christ is the savior of the world. They do not need the good news announced to them.

“We all must die and are like water spilled on the ground that cannot be gathered up again, but the Lord does not take away life, instead He devises ways for the banished to be restored.”

The risen Christ preaches to the dead

“Christ also has once suffered for sins, the just for the unjust, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh, but quickened by the Spirit: by which also he went and preached to the spirits in prison; which once were disobedient, when once the long suffering of God waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was in preparation, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water… for this cause was the gospel preached also to them that are dead, that they might be judged according to men in the flesh, but live according to God in the spirit.”

"Who shall render an account unto him who is holding in readiness to judge living and dead; for, unto this end, even unto the dead, was the glad-message delivered,—in order that they might be judged, indeed, according to men in flesh, but might live according to God in spirit." -Rotherham Emphasized-

Dead=

nekros= a corpse (from nekus)=

Breathed his last/ lifeless.

Deceased/ departed.

Destitute of life/ without life.

Inanimate.

Disobedient= apeitheo=

Not to allow one’s self to be persuaded.

To refuse or withhold belief & obedience.

To refuse belief and obedience.

Not to comply with.

Live= zao=

To be alive with resurrection life.

.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Saint Steven
Upvote 0

ClementofA

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 10, 2016
5,459
2,197
Vancouver
✟310,073.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
I know the universalim believers could care less about this post.

Really? How do you know that?

Search and study the scriptures, not some man, not some video.

Don't forget to listen to men also, since Love Omnipotent put teachers in the church. I wonder what men you listen to Julie. Evidently Strong, for one:

The KJV can be translated back with the Strong's.

So you have your own translation of KJV, "translated back with the Strong's"? How do you do this translation work? Is the translation called the JulieKJV? I'm looking forward to seeing it in print. Hopefully your qualifications in Greek & Hebrew are better than Strong, since he had hardly any.

Luke 13:3 Christ's words- "I tell you, nay, but except that ye "repent", ye shall "all" likewise perish"

Right there, are you going to trust the Lord, or are you going to put your confidence in what some man says? One has to read the entire letter God has written to us and go from there.

If all were eventually saved, this would not be Christ's teaching. Do your own study of the word "perish".

Presemably you think that out of context quote of Luke 13:3 is a "proof text" against universalism.

XYZ said:
There were present at that season some who told Him about the Galileans whose blood Pilate had mingled with their sacrifices.And Jesus answered and said to them, “Do you suppose that these Galileans were worse sinners than all other Galileans, because they suffered such things?I tell you, no; but unless you repent you will all likewise perish.Or those eighteen on whom the tower in Siloam fell and killed them, do you think that they were worse sinners than all other men who dwelt in Jerusalem?I tell you, no; but unless you repent you will all likewise perish.” - Luke 13:1-5 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/...5&version=NKJV

If a man doesn't repent, then he will perish. It's as simple as that. Don't humble yourself before God in this life, then you will be humbled by Him in the next, and then because your name isn't in the Lamb's Book of Life, you will be cast into the Lake of Fire, along with Satan and the Antichrist, and those who took the mark of the beast, and with death and all of hell.


Nothing in Luke 13:1-5 contradicts universalism, or even makes reference to hell or the afterlife - AT ALL:

Luke 13:1 There were present at that season some who told Him about the Galileans whose blood Pilate had [a]mingled with their sacrifices. 2 And Jesus answered and said to them, “Do you suppose that these Galileans were worse sinners than all other Galileans, because they suffered such things? 3 I tell you, no; but unless you repent you will all likewise perish. 4 Or those eighteen on whom the tower in Siloam fell and killed them, do you think that they were worse sinners than all other men who dwelt in Jerusalem? 5 I tell you, no; but unless you repent you will all likewise perish.”

Speaking of the consequences of not repenting as merely perishing by having a tower fall on you is - so lame - if Jesus were a believer in endless punishment. Ooops!

? said:
Do you agree with Vincent that aidios means everlasting?

I think it was a superior word to use relative to the ambiguous aion & aionios, if God was a believer in endless punishment. Moreover, as opposed to aion and aionios (which are often used of finite duration), God had a number of other words & expressions available that would also have better served to express endless punishment, if Love Omnipotent were a believer of such. But He never uses such of eschatological punishment. So the reasonable conclusion is that Love Omnipotent rejected using such words and expressions of a final destiny of endless punishment because He knew better & He rejected the notion that anyone will endure endless punishment. Those words & expresssions are:

1. no end (Lk.1:33)...this expression is used of God's kingdom having "no end". It is never used of anyone's torments or punishment. We never read of anyone receiving torments that will have "no end". This unambiguous phrase, "no end", would have been a superior choice to the ambiguous words aion & aionion, if Love Omnipotent had a belief in endless torments or annihilation. But He rejected its use in expressing such a fate.

2. endless (1 Tim.1:4)...Again if Love Omnipotent believed in endless torments, why didn't He use this word to express it, instead of the ambiguous aion & aionion, which often refer to finite durations in ancient Greek usage?

3. never (Mt.7:23, etc)...this word appears to occur 16 times in the NT & it seems that it never means anything except "never". It is used of "love never fails" (1 Cor.13:8). It also occurs in Mt.7:23 where Jesus says "I never knew you; depart you from Me, those working lawlessness." Which is such an incredibly lame remark, if Love Omnipotent believed in endless torments. If He believed that such an unspeakably horrific final destiny awaits the wicked, including those He was referring to in Mt.7:23, why didn't He make it clear by telling them that they would "never" be saved and/or He would "never" know them? Would that not have been clear & unambiguous, unlike the words He spoke, & unlike the ambiguous aion & aionios, which often refer to finite duration in ancient Koine Greek? OTOH consider re the use of the word "never":

"Philo saith, “The punishment of the wicked person is, ζην αποθανοντα αει, to live for ever dying, and to be for ever in pains, and griefs, and calamities that never cease..." Mark 9 Benson Commentary

Yet Scripture - never - uses such language. Moreover, it speaks of death being abolished, not being "for ever".

4. eternal (Rom.1:16; Jude 1:6)...this word, AIDIOS, is used of God's "eternal" power & "eternal" chains that bind until the day of judgement. It is never used of anyone's final destiny. We never read of anyone being tormented for eternal ages. We never read of anyone suffering eternal (AIDIOS) punishment. If Jude believed in endless punishment, he had the perfect opportunity at Jude 1:6 by simply adding that the angels would suffer the judgement of eternal (AIDIOS) punishment or torments. Instead of warning his readers of such a horrificly monstrous fate, as he should have been morally obligated to do if it were a real possibility, instead he conveys the relatively utterly lame & insignificant info that these angelic beings will be kept in chains until judgement day. OTOH, consider:

"Instead of saying with Philo and Josephus, thanaton athanaton, deathless or immortal death; eirgmon aidion, eternal imprisonment; aidion timorion, eternal torment; and thanaton ateleuteton, interminable death, he [Jesus] used aionion kolasin..." Chapter 3 - Origin of Endless Punishment

"Nyssa defined the vision of God promised there as "life without end, eternal incorruption, undying beatitude [ten ateleuteton zoen, ten aidion aphtharsian , ten athanaton makarioteta]." ("Christianity and Classical Culture: The Metamorphosis of Natural Theology in ..." By Jaroslav Pelikan, p.165 @): Christianity and Classical Culture

5. unfading (1 Pet.1:4; 5:4)...Peter uses this word of an endless inheritance reserved in heaven & a crown of glory. It is never used of the endless pain, punishment or torments that anyone will receive. Can it be denied that this would have been a superior word (over aion & aionios) to use to express such a horrific destiny if Love Omnipotent actually had such in store for anyone? Wouldn't He want to express warnings about it in the clearest ways possible?

6. found no place for repentance (Heb.12:17)...is used in Heb.12:17 of the loss of a finite earthly blessing..."he found no place of repentance, although having earnestly sought it with tears". Never is it used regarding those in Gehenna, Hades, the lake of fire, or eschatological punishment. Never do we read of those cast into any "hell" that they will not (or never) find a place of repentance, even though they earnestly seek it with tears. God was quite capable of expressing such in His Holy Scriptures. But rather than give such a warning, as Love Omnipotent should have if such an unbelievably horrific future awaited anyone, instead we are told of the relatively lame loss of a finite earthly blessing. Such a waste of words if endless punishment were really true.

7. In Mt.18:6 is the lame warning of a punishment which is compared to mere drowning, which is nothing compared to being kept alive for the sole purpose of being tortured for all the "endless" ages of eternity that have "no end" & "never" cease. Jesus says it is "better for them to have a large millstone hung around their neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea". OTOH, if He had been a believer in endless punishment, He could have expressed that by saying it is better for them to have never lived, never been conceived, or that their parents had never known (had sex with) one another. Compare this anti-biblical Jewish view that the Lord Jesus Christ, Love Omnipotent, rejected:

"To every individual is apportioned two shares, one in hell and one in paradise. At death, however, the righteous man's portion in hell is exchanged, so that he has two in heaven, while the reverse is true in the case of sinners (Ḥag. 15a). Hence it would have been better for the latter not to have lived at all (Yeb. 63b)." GEHENNA - JewishEncyclopedia.com
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old.
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
28,578
6,064
EST
✟993,185.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
FineLinen said:
“Christ also has once suffered for sins, the just for the unjust, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh, but quickened by the Spirit: by which also he went and preached to the spirits in prison; which once were disobedient, when once the long suffering of God waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was in preparation, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water… for this cause was the gospel preached also to them that are dead, that they might be judged according to men in the flesh, but live according to God in the spirit.”...
Hell/the grave is never called prison and prison is never called hell/the grave in the Bible.
If as some folks claim Jesus preached to dead spirits in hell/the grave then His mission was a failure. There were only eight people saved, Noah and his family, and they were alive, not dead.
Preaching to dead spirits in the the grave/hell was not part of Jesus' ministry.

Luke 4:18-19
18 The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he hath anointed me to preach the gospel to the poor; he hath sent me to heal the brokenhearted, to preach deliverance to the captives, and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty them that are bruised,
19 To preach the acceptable year of the Lord.
The word translated "captives" literally "prisoner(s) of war." There are no poor, brokenhearted, captives, blind or bruised in the grave,
 
Upvote 0

WebersHome

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
May 7, 2017
2,140
460
Oregon
✟368,343.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
.
2Ths 2:11-12 . . God will send them strong delusion, that they should believe the lie, that they all may be condemned who did not believe the truth but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

In other words; there's coming a time when God's patience will reach its reasonable limits, and He will purposely, willfully, and deliberately make sure that a certain category of people have no chance whatsoever to be spared the wrath of God.

» Back when Noah was preparing the ark, no doubt his neighbors all mocked and poked fun at him like one of those deranged souls that go around with a sandwich board that reads: Repent; The End Is Near! But when the rain started, I bet those very same neighbors panicked and tried to get Noah to open up and let them in. But even had Noah wanted to; he couldn't. The hatch of the ark was sealed from the outside: and God was the only one on earth who could open it-- He chose not to.
_
 
Upvote 0

FineLinen

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Jan 15, 2003
12,119
6,396
81
The Kingdom of His dear Son
✟528,512.00
Faith
Non-Denom
.

In other words; there's coming a time when God's patience will reach its reasonable limits, and He will purposely, willfully, and deliberately make sure that a certain category of people have no chance whatsoever to be spared the wrath of God.

Good grief Webers !

You evidently do not behold that the steadfast love of the Lord NEVER ceases, it is new EVERY morning, great is Your faithfulness.
 
Upvote 0

FineLinen

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Jan 15, 2003
12,119
6,396
81
The Kingdom of His dear Son
✟528,512.00
Faith
Non-Denom
.
Back when Noah was preparing the ark, no doubt his neighbors all mocked and poked fun at him like one of those deranged souls that go around with a sandwich board that reads: Repent; The End Is Near! But when the rain started, I bet those very same neighbors panicked and tried to get Noah to open up and let them in. But even had Noah wanted to; he couldn't. The hatch of the ark was sealed from the outside: and God was the only one on earth who could open it-- He chose not to.

The Saviour of all mankind must have said, good riddance to the rascals as He lost sight of them?

“We all must die and are like water spilled on the ground that cannot be gathered up again, but the Lord does not take away life, instead He devises ways for the banished to be restored.”

The risen Christ preaches to the dead

“Christ also has once suffered for sins, the just for the unjust, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh, but quickened by the Spirit: by which also he went and preached to the spirits in prison; which once were disobedient, when once the long suffering of God waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was in preparation, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water… for this cause was the gospel preached also to them that are dead, that they might be judged according to men in the flesh, but live according to God in the spirit.”

"Who shall render an account unto him who is holding in readiness to judge living and dead; for, unto this end, even unto the dead, was the glad-message delivered,—in order that they might be judged, indeed, according to men in flesh, but might live according to God in spirit."

-Rotherham Emphasized-

Dead=

nekros= a corpse (from nekus)=

Breathed his last/ lifeless.

Deceased/ departed.

Destitute of life/ without life.

Inanimate.

Disobedient= apeitheo=

Not to allow one’s self to be persuaded.

To refuse or withhold belief & obedience.

To refuse belief and obedience.

Not to comply with.

Live= zao=

To be alive with resurrection life.

.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Saint Steven
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old.
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
28,578
6,064
EST
✟993,185.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
FineLinen said:
Good grief Webers !
You evidently do not behold that the steadfast love of the Lord NEVER ceases, it is new EVERY morning, great is Your faithfulness.
Lamentations 3:22-27
22 It is of the LORD'S mercies that we are not consumed, because his compassions fail not.
23 They are new every morning: great is thy faithfulness.
24 The LORD is my portion, saith my soul; therefore will I hope in him.
25 The LORD is good unto them that wait for him, to the soul that seeketh him.
26 It is good that a man should both hope and quietly wait for the salvation of the LORD.
27 It is good for a man that he bear the yoke in his youth.
This proof text only applies to the living.
There is no hope in the grave/hell.
Nobody in the grave/hell are waiting or seeking for anything.
Nobody in the grave/hell is waiting for salvation.
Nobody is bearing any yokes in the grave/hell.

Ecclesiastes 9:5 For the living know that they shall die: but the dead know not any thing, neither have they any more a reward; for the memory of them is forgotten.
Isaiah 26:14
They are dead, they shall not live; they are deceased, they shall not rise: therefore hast thou visited and destroyed them, and made all their memory to perish.
Psalms 6:5 For in death there is no remembrance of thee: in the grave who shall give thee thanks?
Psalms 88:10 Wilt thou shew wonders to the dead? shall the dead arise and praise thee? Selah.
Psalms 88:11 Shall thy lovingkindness be declared in the grave? or thy faithfulness in destruction?
Ecclesiastes 9:10 Whatsoever thy hand findeth to do, do it with thy might; for there is no work, nor device, nor knowledge, nor wisdom, in the grave, whither thou goest.
Isaiah 38:18 For the grave cannot praise thee, death can not celebrate thee: they that go down into the pit cannot hope for thy truth.
John 9:4 I must work the works of him that sent me, while it is day: the night cometh, when no man can work.
 
Upvote 0