Well, that's a nice service the church provides. After all, we wouldn't want demons to stay just demons. Let's hear it for self-improvement.In many churches today demons are taught to be fallen angels.
Upvote
0
Well, that's a nice service the church provides. After all, we wouldn't want demons to stay just demons. Let's hear it for self-improvement.In many churches today demons are taught to be fallen angels.
Well, that's a nice service the church provides. After all, we wouldn't want demons to stay just demons. Let's hear it for self-improvement.
You are probably getting a bit of selection bias. I can see three viewpoints regarding demons:One of the many things which has surprised me about Christianity, since joining CF back in 2012, is the apparently widespread Christian belief in the existence of demons. Attributing various negative events and strange experiences to demonic activity is a regular occurrence in this Forum, leaving the impression that belief in demons is broadly accepted by Christians.
In a recent example, I came across an opinion that so-called ‘aliens’ were actually (probably) demons and that alien cults were likely to be demon inspired. This is only one of many instances where I've seen demonic activity described as the cause of a negative event.
I’d be interested in hearing informed Christian opinion on the concept of demons particularly as it relates to the following questions:
What is a demon?
Is belief in the actual (as opposed to metaphorical) existence of demons and demonic activity an across-the-board Christian belief or is it confined to certain denominations or Christian sub-groups?
How do Christians differentiate between things caused by demons and naturally (including human) caused events?
Please note that I am not advancing a personal opinion for or against the existence of demons. I’m curious about how they are perceived by Christians.
OB
Demon - WikipediaThere are indications that demons in popular Hebrew mythology were believed to come from the nether world. Various diseases and ailments were ascribed to them, particularly those affecting the brain and those of internal nature. Examples include catalepsy, headache, epilepsy and nightmares. There also existed a demon of blindness, "Shabriri" (lit. "dazzling glare") who rested on uncovered water at night and blinded those who drank from it.
Demons supposedly entered the body and caused the disease while overwhelming or "seizing" the victim. To cure such diseases, it was necessary to draw out the evil demons by certain incantations and talismanic performances, at which the Essenes excelled
I finally got it. It took about 30 seconds before the penny dropped.Well, that's a nice service the church provides. After all, we wouldn't want demons to stay just demons. Let's hear it for self-improvement.
I appreciate your reply TCB but, as I mentioned in the final para, I'm not here to argue for or against the existence of demons. Obviously as an atheist I'm unlikely to believe.
My interest is in how Christians see demons as part of an ongoing attempt at understanding Christianity.
OB
Don’t knock a good fence post. A properly fixed fence post is a thing of beauty.
Thanks Chet.Hello! In many churches today demons are taught to be fallen angels. But to the Jews in the 2nd temple period and to the early church fathers they were something different: the disembodied spirits of dead men, specifically the nephilim. They were the forbidden offspring of fallen angels and human women, and when they died they were denied the grave along with other men because of their mixed parentage. They were sentenced to roam the earth without bodies, continuously hungry and thirsty, until the final judgment. Their fathers were sentenced to be chained in darkness in the underworld.
Multiple church fathers wrote of this including Justin Martyr, Athenagoras, Lactantius, and Commodianus. Given a little time I can find the references if you wish to read them yourself. And afaik it was the default Jewish belief of the time. Even Josephus, the famous Jewish historian, included it in "Antiquities of the Jews". So the belief was considered to be historical, not theological.
There is another possibility: Demons aren't conscious entities, but represent suprapersonal evil. Even if it's not conscious, I don't think there's any question that there's an evil that's bigger than any individual. Maybe it's social, maybe it's supernatural, but it's there.You are probably getting a bit of selection bias. I can see three viewpoints regarding demons:
1. Demons don't exist
2. Demons exist but do not routinely cause supernatural events on earth.
3. Demons exist and regularly impact events on earth.
The effort you put in was obvious and deserved recognition.Yes, it took a bit for me to put that together lol. Thanks for the appreciation of my reply, that’s very admirable.
Atheists are basically no different to Christians apart from a belief in God. Overall we probably tend to be a little more analytical.Forgive me, I’m not the greatest when it comes to explanations, but I am glad I answered at least something you asked. It’s difficult for me to place perspective when taking to a non-Christian.
Please allow me to address the issue of discernment. As a Christian, discernment comes from God and a certain level of it each to their own level of faith.
Can a person on their own accord use wrong judgement? Absolutely. But relying on God and His strength over our own, discernment from Him will never fail.
As Christians we heavily rely on our God as He knows and sees all things where we do not. I really hope you can understand how I’m trying to convey the two differences
An interesting viewpoint but I must admit the idea of an evil bigger than any individual is not something I would subscribe to. Where possible I avoid using the word since it carries considerable Christian baggage including the concept of evil as some sort of abstract entity.There is another possibility: Demons aren't conscious entities, but represent suprapersonal evil. Even if it's not conscious, I don't think there's any question that there's an evil that's bigger than any individual. Maybe it's social, maybe it's supernatural, but it's there.
I would say that belief in demons is something of a majority view--the liberal churches that are more skeptical are the exception rather than the rule, and even there it's not that uncommon to find people who still take it literally. The difference would probably be whether demonic activity is discussed from the pulpit: I've heard sermons on quite literal spiritual warfare at the Eastern Orthodox church I visit, but never at an Episcopal or liberal Lutheran church.
The level of matter-of-fact acceptance of demons in this thread has surprised me although looking at the number of demon related CF posts I shouldn't be surprised. I think 2 posters may have leaned towards seeing demons as metaphorical.
One of the problems in trying to gauge overall Christian beliefs is that CF members are not a typical cross section. While we have no available data on our CF population it appears to be weighted towards the conservative end of the spectrum. Factor in an overwhelming American majority and the population may be a long way from being a representative sample of Christians generally.
As I've said in another post I suspect the more liberal churches may be too embarrassed to openly admit to demon belief even though it does appear to be deeply buried in the Christian psyche.
OB
You seem to be saying that it isn't really possible to differentiate between natural events and those caused by demonic interference.Opinions vary. In my opinion the root of these differences lies in uncertainty about the nature of angels and demons. It's difficult since we are talking about beings that are magnitudes of order more powerful than human beings, so the idea that we can circumscribe their nature, powers, or behavior is ruled out from the get-go.
I think that's the starkest point that materialists miss: studying a spiritual being is not like studying a material being such as a platypus. Perhaps an ant could study (or control) a grain of sand, but in no way could it study or control an orangutan. We are the ant, and we oughtn't approach a grain of sand in the same way we approach an orangutan.
The effort you put in was obvious and deserved recognition.
Atheists are basically no different to Christians apart from a belief in God. Overall we probably tend to be a little more analytical.
Can I give you an example of what I mean? On a number of occasions I've read CF posts which have asked about seeing demons. The typical situation is someone seeing or hearing a presence, at night, either on going to sleep or on waking up. The reaction from other Christians has often been to confirm the demon and suggest prayer etc. as a means eradicating its presence.
The problem is that these types of hallucination are a well know sleep disorder known as hypnogogic (waking up) and hypnopompic (going to sleep) hallucinations. Without knowing this it's easy to discern the problem as demons. Sometimes a little investigation can turn up a more simple answer. I think true discernment means making the effort to investigate the possibility of natural causes.
OB
This suggests that there is a certain amount of skepticism: Most American Christians Do Not Believe that Satan or the Holy Spirit Exist - Barna Group. Here's a survey of the American public as a whole: Belief in demons | QuickStats | The Association of Religion Data Archives.One of the problems in trying to gauge overall Christian beliefs is that CF members are not a typical cross section. While we have no available data on our CF population it appears to be weighted towards the conservative end of the spectrum. Factor in an overwhelming American majority and the population may be a long way from being a representative sample of Christians generally.
I think the best way to explain what I believe about how the demonic works is to give a real world example. This is a real story that I have direct knowledge of, only the names have been changed to protect the innocent:If you look at my last post you'll see I've added a PS wherein I attempt to explain that my interest is in what people actually believe