the iconoclast
Atheism is weak. Yep, I said it
Thanks, but remember the Dolly Parton quote:
Stand up.....and then duck.
Haha, i like you
Upvote
0
Thanks, but remember the Dolly Parton quote:
Stand up.....and then duck.
Do you agree with Aman777's specific interpretation of the Bible?
Do you believe that Adam was created ~9 billion years ago and that the first humans came to Earth from another world and then interbred with prehistoric people that had evolved from earlier primates?
I'm trying to see if any other Christians on this site agree with him, but so far it's zip.
Hey kylie
Excellent, we both agree that you should not hold your breath until i respond and continue our fun conversation.
I like our conversations but i do like to converse with others. I think its coming on to 2 years since we first began our dialogue. Wow the time goes by.
It would be amazing if i did see you anywhere else. Im curious, besides convincing your husband to become a "critically thinking Christian" - see i remember - what else do you get up to?
While i await @sfs and @The Barbarian to reply, Is there a link between you being here and your husbands belief system?
Cheers
I don't see what my life has to do with you.
Hey hey you unique, special and incredible individual. I have some downtime while i await @sfs and @The Barbarian to reply.
Your life is your business and nobody elses - unless its unlawful, then its the govs.
Lets start small, what harmless activities- which are not intimate - do you get up to when you are not on cf?
What do you hope to acheive by being on cf and how would it benefit you outside cf?
Cheers
You missed the point (again). You claim "all animals came from water just as science discovered", but then you claim "Jesus made some animals from Earth". You can't have it both ways. If all animals came from water, then Genesis 1:25 is wrong. But if Jesus made some animals from Earth then Genesis does not agree with science.
I have not read everything that my brother in Christ has written but what i have read, im not in complete disagreement with. He may disagree with somethings i believe, what we are united in is our faith in Jesus Christ - who is salvation.
How does that make you feel?
Lets get into something or do you prefer to ridicule others to make you feel good about yourself - like when you pointed out xinghua is a laughing stock?
Why do you reject Jesus?
EVERY living creature that moves is destined for Heaven EXCEPT Humans, since they have a free choice of where to spend Eternity.
Given the thousands of belief systems that have existed throughout history, I don't believe that any individual religion is true.
Amen. Since there are more than 30k denominations and NONE of them are 100% correct, you can't believe ANY of them and that is exactly the way God wanted it to be.
Now, you know WHY I show that Scripture, science, history, genetics and math AGREE.
For me, I love the Bible and science, but this wondrous universe coming about spontaneously from singularity (the meaning of which I barely understand) in a big bang, without the mighty hand of God; a “single cell something” rising up from a mud hole (primordial soup of some kind) “on its own” in baron [sic], inhospitable conditions and becoming “the common ancestor” in a linear progression to the varieties of everything on a beautifully complex earth, including man...
well, just step back from all the jargon and defense for a moment and look at that picture.
...but how people are completely sold on biblical creation by an Almighty God for which there is no evidence and at the same time regard things they admit (or exhibit) they do not understand and dismiss as a fairy tale, really puzzles me.but how people are completely sold on that “one in a gazillion” possibility, and at the same time regard the biblical creation by an Almighty God (however and by whatever means He desired to accomplish it) to be a fairy tale, really puzzles me.
... as you said, just the clif notes premise sounds absurd but when you start digging into the complexity of even a single cell and the wondrous workings contained in it with the DNA code and the complex chemical reactions, you realize that this cannot be the simple beginning of something more complex but is in it very nature, more complex than science can explain or even fathom.
Now THAT is some funny stuff.Never mind the abundance of Creation science and evidence that agrees completely with the observable world.
No matter how many times you claim this, we all know it's not true. No need to keep pretending.
Can you refute me Scripturally, scientifically, historically, genetically or mathematically? Of course not.
First, still not how the burden of proof works. The onus is not on us to refute you. The onus is on you to support your view.
Second, you've already been refuted, but then you just shift the goal posts. Like for example your artificial distinction between "true science" (aka stuff you agree with) versus what you call "false science" (aka stuff you don't). Notice that you don't point out that distinction in the above quote, because it doesn't exactly carry the same aura of gravitas when pointed out that you reject a whole bunch of science, history, genetics, etc, in the first place.
Consequently, there is no argument to be had there, since your position is philosophically indefensible at that point. You appear to have no objective basis for anything you are claiming.
And as discussions with others have gone, you end up contradicting yourself in your own efforts to support your position. Which is the sign of a dubious position to begin with.
Can you refute me Scripturally, scientifically, historically, genetically or mathematically?
I agree totally with every True discovery of Science but changeable Theories, which cannot be repeated (like the Theory of the evolution of Human intelligence) are considered WRONG by Science itself, thus subject to change when the current Theory is refuted.
So you're admitting that, contrary to your assertion, Genesis does not agree with science?You ignored the fact that God the Trinity created "EVERY living creature that moveth" from Water on the 5th Day. EVERY living creature that moves is destined for Heaven EXCEPT Humans, since they have a free choice of where to spend Eternity. My words are in black:
Gen 1:21 And God created great whales, and every living (eternal) creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after THEIR (Trinity) kind, (Spiritual and eternal kind) and every winged fowl after HIS (Jesus temporary) kind: and God (The Trinity) saw that it was good.
God created every living creature that moveth from water after THEIR kind, Genesis 1:21 which is ALWAYS an eternal creation, thus insuring that they will be in Heaven. God the Trinity also created every winged fowl eternal after the kind Jesus made with His own Hands or HIS kind. Genesis 2:19
God the Trinity did NOT create mosquitoes or any of the creeping things Lord God/Jesus made temporarily since Heaven doesn't have pests. Amen?
You ignored the fact that God the Trinity created "EVERY living creature that moveth" from Water on the 5th Day. EVERY living creature that moves is destined for Heaven EXCEPT Humans, since they have a free choice of where to spend Eternity. My words are in black:
Gen 1:21 And God created great whales, and every living (eternal) creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after THEIR (Trinity) kind, (Spiritual and eternal kind) and every winged fowl after HIS (Jesus temporary) kind: and God (The Trinity) saw that it was good.
God created every living creature that moveth from water after THEIR kind, Genesis 1:21 which is ALWAYS an eternal creation, thus insuring that they will be in Heaven. God the Trinity also created every winged fowl eternal after the kind Jesus made with His own Hands or HIS kind. Genesis 2:19
God the Trinity did NOT create mosquitoes or any of the creeping things Lord God/Jesus made temporarily since Heaven doesn't have pests. Amen?
I understand evolution up to the point where interpretations take-on speculation & projection.I italicized some of the possible reasons that you reject evolution. You don't seem to understand it.
I thought it suitable verbiage to describe the macroevolution pitch."jargon and defense." Interesting choice of words!
You sort of twisted my use of 'fairy tale' in your statement. Perhaps you overlooked my comment "For me, I love the Bible and science." If you will read my OP again, you will see that my reference was 'how can people accept our existence as being an incredibly lucky shot,' on the one hand, and then refer to the Biblical Creation as a fairy tale, on the other. I don't regard science as a fairy tale, I just disagree with some interpretations of evidence....but how people are completely sold on biblical creation by an Almighty God for which there is no evidence and at the same time regard things they admit (or exhibit) they do not understand and dismiss as a fairy tale, really puzzles me.