Debunk this . . . if you can . . .

[com7fy8]

Right now, in the United States, there seems to be a fifty-fifty split between Republicans and Democrats. Since in America all voters are considered equal, I think it could be fair that voters of each party can have say about their tax money.

So, using our present example > Hillary lost, but she got about fifty-percent of the votes; and so the Democratic voters should have use of fifty percent of tax money through candidates whom they have succeeded in electing into office, while the Republicans have about fifty percent of money to control.

They would not be allowed to spend their money on just anything.

Health care spending would have a minimum percentage. So would defense and education and some other items. But each party is authorized to control a certain amount of tax money, depending on how many votes they got for their presidential candidate.

This way, for one example, Democrats can vote their money into a health care bill which does what they want. But Republicans must use their health care money. Or unused money is automatically forfeited to the other party.

 

[iluvatar5150]

What's to debunk? You didn't make any claims.

 

[Willie T]

So you have crippled the United States by effectively eliminating the availability of the necessary funds to run the country. The country cannot run on half of the taxes... no matter which party is in charge.

 

[yeshuaslavejeff]

Debunk what exactly ?

It's obvious the country has been driven bankrupt on purpose, as also most all cities and states (it seems anyway).

Setting up for the one world monetary system that much is already in place for.

 

[com7fy8]

You didn't make any claims.

Debunk that such a system could be good.

 

[com7fy8]

The country cannot run on half of the taxes... no matter which party is in charge.

I agree how it could cripple the country. But I mean that each party would have control of spending tax money in proportion to the votes that party got. This way, even if they do not agree on how to do health care, for one example, each party would invest its portion in health care, how it chose to do so.

Now, this could get interesting, especially in the case of defense spending.

 

[com7fy8]

It's obvious the country has been driven bankrupt on purpose, as also most all cities and states (it seems anyway).

Setting up for the one world monetary system that much is already in place for.

There are other Biblical issues.

For example, we are told to have the same mind and speak the same thing; so it would not be Biblical.

 

[Halbhh]

Right now, in the United States, there seems to be a fifty-fifty split between Republicans and Democrats. Since in America all voters are considered equal, I think it could be fair that voters of each party can have say about their tax money.

So, using our present example > Hillary lost, but she got about fifty-percent of the votes; and so the Democratic voters should have use of fifty percent of tax money through candidates whom they have succeeded in electing into office, while the Republicans have about fifty percent of money to control.

They would not be allowed to spend their money on just anything.

Health care spending would have a minimum percentage. So would defense and education and some other items. But each party is authorized to control a certain amount of tax money, depending on how many votes they got for their presidential candidate.

This way, for one example, Democrats can vote their money into a health care bill which does what they want. But Republicans must use their health care money. Or unused money is automatically forfeited to the other party.

A few more pieces of information: voter self identification puts independents as the largest group of the 3. Party Affiliation

Those familiar with how states typically vote will notice the preponderance of Democratic states among the states paying the most total federal tax revenue to the federal government.

State
Gross collections [1]
($ in 000)

California 456,555,954 (that's $457 billion in Federal taxes paid by California)
Texas 280,048,364
New York 281,220,376
Florida 205,694,126
Illinois 161,189,282
New Jersey 138,976,784
Ohio 140,891,209
Pennsylvania 136,268,950
Massachusetts 117,998,443
Minnesota 99,354,057
Georgia 92,804,948
Virginia 84,844,999
North Carolina 82,539,491
Michigan 83,256,186
Washington 90,404,108
Federal tax revenue by state - Wikipedia

How states votes in the presidential election in 2016:
2016 Election Results: President Live Map by State, Real-Time Voting Updates

 

[yeshuaslavejeff]

There are other Biblical issues.

For example, we are told to have the same mind and speak the same thing; so it would not be Biblical.

What ?

We are to come out of babylon, not to have the same mind nor to speak like they speak.

 

[hislegacy]

How can you debunk something that is a fantasy??

 

[NightHawkeye]

Debunk what exactly ?

It's obvious the country has been driven bankrupt on purpose, as also most all cities and states (it seems anyway).

Setting up for the one world monetary system that much is already in place for.

And I saw as it were a sea of glass mingled with fire: and them that had gotten the victory over the beast, and over his image, and over his mark, and over the number of his name, stand on the sea of glass, having the harps of God.

And they sing the song of Moses the servant of God, and the song of the Lamb, saying, Great and marvellous are thy works, Lord God Almighty; just and true are thy ways, thou King of saints.

Who shall not fear thee, O Lord, and glorify thy name? for thou only art holy: for all nations shall come and worship before thee; for thy judgments are made manifest.

And after that I looked, and, behold, the temple of the tabernacle of the testimony in heaven was opened: And the seven angels came out of the temple, having the seven plagues, clothed in pure and white linen, and having their breasts girded with golden girdles. And one of the four beasts gave unto the seven angels seven golden vials full of the wrath of God, who liveth for ever and ever. And the temple was filled with smoke from the glory of God, and from his power; and no man was able to enter into the temple, till the seven plagues of the seven angels were fulfilled.​

 

[yeshuaslavejeff]

How can you debunk something that is a fantasy??

From what other posts say, apparently it is just a sail empty of wind - just ignore.....

 

[TLK Valentine]

There are other Biblical issues.

Then those issues are irrelevant.

 

[com7fy8]

California 456,555,954 (that's $457 billion in Federal taxes paid by California)

Before I make my comment on this > there seems to be one technical detail > you say "$457 billion", but list "$456,555,954" which would round out to $457 million . . . unless you are giving an abbreviation for $457 billion.

In any case, my point is > I thought in another thread we were noting a claim that San Francisco has a rat problem and/or can't clean homeless poop off their streets. So, how does California have so much money but that is happening? . . . if that is a correct report, of course.

I do know Donald once was broadcasting that Barack had no birth certificate and it showed up, reportedly; so if Donald says someone has a rat or poop problem, I don't assume it.

 

[com7fy8]

We are to come out of babylon, not to have the same mind nor to speak like they speak.

I mean how Christians are commanded to speak the same thing with one another; I do not mean to agree with wrong people. And so, if government people are fighting with each other, this is not Biblical. Plus, of course, God's word means ones need to agree on what is right.

 

[Ophiolite]

Debunk that such a system could be good.

I think you meant discredit, or rebut. To debunk it we would have to show it was false, not what it seems, a sham. (Do you think it might be a sham? )

 

[yeshuaslavejeff]

I mean how Christians are commanded to speak the same thing with one another; I do not mean to agree with wrong people. And so, if government people are fighting with each other, this is not Biblical. Plus, of course, God's word means ones need to agree on what is right.

Yes, good, thanks for the positive and expected clarification.
God's People, born of Him , are to live as one with one another, and as one with the son and with the Father, just as the son and the Father are one.
Most people don't choose to do this, don't choose to live right, as God Says,
and God doesn't make them change their mind. They suffer in this life and later, as He says.

 

[thecolorsblend]

With as much respect as I'm capable of mustering under the circumstances, this is a really bad policy idea.

 

[iluvatar5150]

Before I make my comment on this > there seems to be one technical detail > you say "$457 billion", but list "$456,555,954" which would round out to $457 million . . . unless you are giving an abbreviation for $457 billion.

It's not uncommon to report numbers on that magnitude in thousands, and in fact, his post says as much:

State
Gross collections [1]
($ in 000)

 

[Halbhh]

Before I make my comment on this > there seems to be one technical detail > you say "$457 billion", but list "$456,555,954" which would round out to $457 million . . . unless you are giving an abbreviation for $457 billion.

In any case, my point is > I thought in another thread we were noting a claim that San Francisco has a rat problem and/or can't clean homeless poop off their streets. So, how does California have so much money but that is happening? . . . if that is a correct report, of course.

I do know Donald once was broadcasting that Barack had no birth certificate and it showed up, reportedly; so if Donald says someone has a rat or poop problem, I don't assume it.

$457 Billion, since the table is in thousands. Sorry, my fault if not clear.