The simplest answer to what you have said is that you are wrong. Quite simply incorrect. But in slightly more detail...
Perhaps it's best just to say, thank you for your contribution.
If you think you have a good argument for God, feel free to post it clearly and succinctly. I will be happy to explain to you why it is incorrect.
There is no "strong evidence for God". If there were, then apologists arguments would be impressive to people other than Christians. As it is, anyone who is not a Christian just shrugs off apologetic arguments as unimpressive.They rarely saw the best theistic arguments. Also, prior the 1950's the evidence for God was not as strong. But after the 1950's the discovery of DNA and all the confirmation for the BB theory plus the anthropic principle were strong evidence for the existence of God.
A Christian says that his holy book is the most impressive? How impressive.I am primarily referring to His existence. This was the next step after you realize He exists, then you want to find out whether He is good, and since the bible is backed up by scientific and historical evidence it is more likely to be of divine origin than any other religious book.
I'm not even sure what to say when confronted with such dizzyingly unjustified self-confidence.The Koran is not backed up by science and history like the bible is. Much of it was borrowed from the bible except for the moral teaching is vastly inferior to the bible as it allows for beating your wife and killing infidels.
Perhaps it's best just to say, thank you for your contribution.
There is no strong evidence for the Christian God, which is in contrast to evolution, which has incredibly strong evidence.I am not saying they are brainwashed, just that the educators dont present the strongest evidence for the theistic position and denigrate students that are theists. See all my previous posts for strong evidence for the christian God.
If you think you have a good argument for God, feel free to post it clearly and succinctly. I will be happy to explain to you why it is incorrect.
Upvote
0