Sanoy
Well-Known Member
- Apr 27, 2017
- 3,169
- 1,421
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
You don't have to reach it at all if you choose not to make claims about reality. But a premise that follows deductively will be superior than one that is inferred. But it goes beyond that, doubt here eats itself. When doubt enters this system, it casts doubt on the inference itself creating a dialectical loop of infinite self refutation. There must be a hypothesis that gives significant enough quality to our noetic faculties to rise out of the event horizon of the dialectical loop. Anything less than that will be sucked under.Why does that conclusion have to be reached by deductive logic?
Upvote
0