Likewise, I could ask if you were able to watch the video in the OP and we could both ponder over the epistemic complications that would be obviously expressed when you answer in the negative. Then I would ask, what are the reasons you didn't see it or consider it? And I imagine you'd say that you couldn't even if you wanted to because ...
... but don't worry about answering this comment of mine, because I'm aware that there is a menagerie of perceptual and hermeneutical problems involved in how any one person who is in China and in a culturally predisposed and politically arbitrated position such as YOUR's, as it presently exists, which play into his ability to find relevance in the things I speak of. Obviously, some of this is out of your control.
But perhaps I digress too much here. I'll just ask you why you think there should be lots of overpowering evidence, everywhere? How so? Who told you or me that God would work in and through the very epistemic assumptions that we hold so dear as a central part of our Modern notions of scientific discovery or investigation? Did Carl Sagan, bless his heart, have the correct evaluative method by which we would ascertain the existence of the Biblical concept of God? Well, despite the prowess of someone like the late Sagan, I'm thinking that he did not and that his "Dragon in the Garage" analogy falls short ... if God isn't, and for the most part hasn't been, working with our current assumptions of apperception.
So, do I have "evidence" of the kind you'd like to see as so defined by today's Modern parlance? No, I don't. But that wouldn't then be to also say that WE have zero evidence of any kind whatsoever. No, we have evidence, it's just not of the type that we prefer to have today, nor is it manifested in ways that we're conditioned to look for, and if we want to 'see' or 'understand' the kind(s) of evidence that God has given indication that He would give, then it probably goes without saying that we'll have to learn and abide by those epistemic pathways by which the Lord has said that we'd have to move through in order to gain a cognitive state of understanding.